DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21949] New: - Multiple Modules : Action Chaining with ForwardAction gives 404 error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21813] - Wildcard-matched actions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21896] - DefinitionDispatcherAction does not recegnize anchor correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

FW: Memory consumption 1.1 b3 vs. 1.1 final

Dear Developers, I've been lurking on the developers list for a while and submitted the questions/problems below to the struts-user list. Unfortunately I haven't gotten a reply, and I was recommended to try the developers list. I hope, that posting this list to the developer list, is not to big a

Re: New TagUtils class

I think TagUtils is fine. As you pointed out, David, it emphasizes that these utilities are meant to be called from taglibs, rather than the JavaServer Page itself. As for other view technologies, I'd say that the utilities are provided to help view technologies create dynamic * HTML * tags by

RE: [validator - ValidWhen ] Bug or unneeded variable.

I'm not sure it's a real bug. I think it's just the kind of code quirks you get when you use a tool like ANTLR or YACC. James > -Original Message- > From: Rob Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: [validator -

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java

rleland 2003/07/28 07:38:16 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java Log: remove @since tags on private members Revision ChangesPath 1.37 +4 -6 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/Ja

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlJavascriptValidatorTag.java

David Graham wrote: I think we should only place @since tags on methods in the public API (public and protected). agreed, 1+ -- Rob Leland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [validator - ValidWhen ] Bug or unneeded variable.

James Turner wrote: It's auto-generated code, so you can talk to the ANTLR folks if you want :-) I was hoping for you would volunteer to take a look at the generated code when you have the chance. :-D This would be helpful since I haven't used validwhen, and am less motovated than someone who

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java

I think we should only place @since tags on methods in the public API (public and protected). Placing them on private members will be confusing if we make those methods accessible in a future release. David --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rleland 2003/07/27 22:54:33 > > Modified:src/sh