dmkarr 2003/09/06 20:19:46
jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/tiles - New
directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dmkarr 2003/09/06 20:22:45
Added: contrib/struts-el/doc/userGuide struts-tiles-el.xml
contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/tiles
ELAddTag.java ELAddTagBeanInfo.java
ELDefinitionTag.java ELDefinitionTagBea
dmkarr 2003/09/06 20:18:45
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/tiles
UseAttributeTag.java ImportAttributeTag.java
Log:
Removing "final" from class declaration, to allow class to be extended in "tiles-el"
(or other classes).
Revision Changes
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 14:53 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
Thanks, I was hoping you would chime in ! It looks like you used
maven for your site,
and I prefer your color scheme over the standard...
You can set a lot of stuff in project.properties -- it should be in a
source distribution f
David M. Karr wrote:
Is there a good reason for the tiles classes "ImportAttributeTag" and
"UseAttributeTag" to be final classes? I can't implement "tiles-el" if those
are final classes.
+1, for removing final. Since struts is a framework there is no good
reason for
marking a class as final.
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> Or, to put it another way, using Maven as a
build system will give us a website/docs publishing system for free.
Well, last I knew, TANSTAAFL. =:)
It's nice that Maven has a build system, so long as it's a build system
that fits our needs. Likewise, it's nice that Mav
At 14:53 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
Thanks, I was hoping you would chime in ! It looks like you used
maven for your site,
and I prefer your color scheme over the standard...
You can set a lot of stuff in project.properties -- it should be in
a source distribution for jgs-struts, or I'll
Is there a good reason for the tiles classes "ImportAttributeTag" and
"UseAttributeTag" to be final classes? I can't implement "tiles-el" if those
are final classes.
--
===
David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
[EMAIL PROT
+1 for only having to use one tool
+1 for being able to customize L&F
I guess that makes me +1 for Maven, but that's qualified by the fact that I
haven't used either so I don't know what bumps we'll hit down the road.
As long as we can produce valid XHTML and customize the L&F I'll be happy.
Ste
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 14:23 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
We can always start a struts-2 web site and tweak it until we like
what we have,
or until it works, which ever comes first ! I also wouldn't want to
maintain a seperate
look and feel except to move the blasted [powered by Maven
At 14:23 -0400 9/6/03, Robert Leland wrote:
We can always start a struts-2 web site and tweak it until we like
what we have,
or until it works, which ever comes first ! I also wouldn't want to
maintain a seperate
look and feel except to move the blasted [powered by Maven] icon
to the bottom
I've used both on a couple of small (personal) projects.
I used Forrest for my kids soccer team's web site. I mean, come on, how
can you make things any simpler than executing "forrest seed"?
And I used Maven for a recent client.
I don't really care which one we use, but I think getting build
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, David Graham wrote:
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Struts we
Robert Leland wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site
documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest.
I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can.
Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe yo
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Struts web site [was: Re: C
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Leland wrote:
> > Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> > system we are moving to ?
>
> Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Forrest, so I would lean
> in that direction.
Does Forrest require that look and fe
Robert Leland wrote:
> Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc
> system we are moving to ?
Don already put the Struts SourceForge site on Forrest, so I would lean
in that direction.
http://struts.sourceforge.net/
http://xml.apache.org/forrest/
-Ted.
--
Yes, I'd like to get involved in that but I haven't used Maven before so I
need to find time to get to grips with it. I'm aware that this is only an
interim measure but figured it was worth getting done now.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
18 matches
Mail list logo
