Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move over to Maven or forrest. I have been working on Mavenizing items as I can. Instead of doing the stylesheets maybe your efforts could be directed towards integrating those xml docs into maven ?
Do we want to hold a formal vote/lazy consensus on what doc system we are moving to ?
I would go with Maven only because it provides a number of usefull reports.
I don't care for the standard Maven look, but believe it's better than what we have.
My main concern is to make sure whatever we pick Maven/Forrest that it's around and thriving a year from now. maven is very active but they also seem to be going through a large refactoring to reduce the memory footprint. Forrest is supposed to be slower and a bigger memory foot print, but I could care unless about that if it doesn't crash my JVM.
The struts site now builds with a basic maven look, maven beta 10.
We just need to hook in the doc xml which shoudln't be too bad, since there is a stylesheet directory
under xdocs. If you take a look at those wild and crazy Tapestry guys
it looks like you can really hack the look and feel to anything you want.
-Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
