Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-19 Thread David Graham
elopers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:59:00 -0800 (PST) On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Thank you for reconsidering Martin :-). What about the situation wh

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-19 Thread Martin Cooper
'htmlComment' attribute should be ignored, and script blocks never > >wrapped in HTML comments. > > > >With the above change, I will remove my -1 on the original changes. > > > >-- > >Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > >

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-19 Thread David Graham
r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods > >Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:51:27 -0800 (PST) > > > >

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-18 Thread Martin Cooper
th the above change, I will remove my -1 on the original changes. -- Martin Cooper > > David > > > > > > > >From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread David Graham
s Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:44:28 -0800 (PST) On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:35:48 -0700 > From: David Graham

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:35:48 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods > > My mail do

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread David Graham
section. David From: "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:39:14 -06

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread David Graham
AIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:51:27 -0800 (PST) On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Ok, what do you think

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread Matt Raible
> I object to generating *incorrect* XHTML -- or XHTML that doesn't follow > the recommendations of the standard -- simply to deal with stupid > browsers. It's basically the same reason I do not want to see us add > non-standard HTML attributes to what we generate either. I agree, just trying to

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matt Raible wrote: > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:17:21 -0700 > From: Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: xhtml jav

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread Martin Cooper
D]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods > >Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:04:45 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > > &

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-17 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > I would tend to agree with Craig in that if we can't do it correctly, > then let's not do it. +1 -- Martin Cooper > > Using the Struts taglibs provided with the core distribution is not a > technical requirement. Other taglibs and technologies are jus

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-16 Thread David Graham
ports it. Dave From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:04:45 -0800 (PST

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-16 Thread Matt Raible
through an XSL stylesheet, and have a whole new website. Sounds good to me! Matt > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:05 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: xhtml javascript hiding method

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-16 Thread Ted Husted
I would tend to agree with Craig in that if we can't do it correctly, then let's not do it. Using the Struts taglibs provided with the core distribution is not a technical requirement. Other taglibs and technologies are just as easy to use with Struts as those we bundle in the distribution. If

RE: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew Hill
javascript hiding methods On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:35:27 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: xhtml javascript hiding methods > &

Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

2003-01-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:35:27 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: xhtml javascript hiding methods > > Well, here are the choices as I understand them: