The other issue here, and one I'm sure that a lot of other folks on the
list who interact with the public a lot can sympathize with, is that
there are a LOT of commercial entities still using 1.0 because they have
a policy of not using beta software. I cringe when I think of all the
people sufferi
> Struts is a product of the Apache Software Foundation...
>
> [cut]
>
> ...we can learn from our mistakes and cut a release
> whenever we add a feature that people can put to good use (instead of
> after we have added a large set of new features).
>
> -Ted.
Couldn't agree more (hence my +1),
+1
This puppy's more than stable enough to cut another RC.
I understand why Martin wants the FileUpload to go through the wringer, and it
should, but it's already the most spiffy-est upload component there is. Beta2
of FileUpload has my vote for RC2.
Somehow in all this I get the nagging feeling
Is that a +1 for the vote?
James
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:19 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with
> FileUpload Beta 2
>
>
>
RE: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with
> FileUpload Beta 2
>
>
> >I'd be happy to, if A) someone will grant me karma on the
> Jakarta web
> >site and B) someone can walk me through the basic steps involved, as
> >I've deferred to Martin "
I'd be happy to, if A) someone will grant me karma on the Jakarta web
site and B) someone can walk me through the basic steps involved, as
I've deferred to Martin "Release Addict" Cooper on these matters in
previous releases I've managed.
I believe all Jakarta committers have karma on the website.
+1. Let's do it!
-James
- Original Message -
From: "James Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with Fi
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> +1
> I agree that deprecating methods does not require a new beta.
> We don't
> guarantee backwards compatibility between betas. James, can
> you act as
> release manager for RC2? Sounds like Martin won't have time to do it.
>
> David
I'
+1
--
James Mitchell
Software Developer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Stru
+1
I agree that deprecating methods does not require a new beta. We don't
guarantee backwards compatibility between betas. James, can you act as
release manager for RC2? Sounds like Martin won't have time to do it.
David
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First off, big thanks
List'
Subject: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with
FileUpload Beta
2
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First off, big thanks to Martin for adopting FileUpload and
getting this
puppy back in shape.
> Now, about the Struts 1.1 RC2 release. The problem is the
>
1.15
US
cents) its:
+1
Do it! Do it now!
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 15:06
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload
Beta
2
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[
I aint no committer/contributor but if I get 2 cents worth (about 1.15 US
cents) its:
+1
Do it! Do it now!
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2003 15:06
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: VOTE (enough already!): Release
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First off, big thanks to Martin for adopting FileUpload and getting this
puppy back in shape.
> Now, about the Struts 1.1 RC2 release. The problem is the
> staging needed to get FileUpload out the door. It's currently
> at Beta 1, and the code ba
14 matches
Mail list logo
