Is that a +1 for the vote?

James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:19 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with 
> FileUpload Beta 2
> 
> 
> I have enough karma to make the release, if Martin is busy, 
> and that's 
> what everyone wants to do. I've put the pieces in place to remove the 
> DBCP dependency, but need to actually release that as well.
> 
> Hopefully, there will be a final release of FileUpload early 
> in June, so 
> we can pop that in and go to final.
> 
> The underlying problem has nothing to do with the Apache process. We 
> simply tried to release too many things at once. If we had done 
> step-wise releases (tag improvements/ nested/ modules/ 
> validator/ tiles/ 
> jstl/ etc), we wouldn't be in this jam. By rights, we should be at 
> something like Struts 1.8 by now.
> 
> As soon as Struts 1.1 is out the door, I'd like to remove the 
> deprecations and release Struts 1.2. It's gotten so that it's hard to 
> see the forest for the trees anymore.
> 
> We should then try to relase whenever a useful feature is 
> added, so as 
> to put it in the hands of people as soon as possible.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> 
> 
> James Turner wrote:
> >>From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > First off, big thanks to Martin for adopting FileUpload and getting 
> > this puppy back in shape.
> > 
> > 
> >>Now, about the Struts 1.1 RC2 release. The problem is the
> >>staging needed to get FileUpload out the door. It's currently 
> >>at Beta 1, and the code base in CVS has some methods that 
> >>have been deprecated since Beta 1. The deprecated methods 
> >>need to be removed before 1.0 Final, which means that we need 
> >>a Beta 2 to publicise the deprecations. Then they can be 
> >>removed in an RC1, shortly to be followed (hopefully) by 1.0 Final.
> >>
> >>Much as I would like to see Struts 1.1 RC2 happen before
> >>JavaOne, I just don't see how that can happen, given the 
> >>steps that FileUpload has to go through before a final release.
> > 
> > 
> > Does this strike anyone but me as an example of the victory 
> of process 
> > over sanity?
> > 
> > Why does a deprecation/removal of some methods require a 
> new beta?  If 
> > your code depends on the deprecated methods, you can stick with 
> > whatever you're using now until you can fix your code, and then use 
> > the release. If you don't, you can evaluate the RC, and an 
> entire step 
> > can be saved.
> > 
> > The entire Struts 1.1 release has been a Kafka-esq 
> adventure in strict 
> > adherence to a set of rules that, IMHO, has done nothing but add 
> > months of delay to an already terminally late release.  
> It's hard to 
> > believe there's something that makes the JCP look speedy, 
> but consider 
> > that in the time we've been struggling to get 1.1 out the door, JSF 
> > has gone almost completely from proposal to EA.
> > 
> > Open source is supposed to be speedy and responsive, instead we're 
> > starting to make Microsoft look like a speed demon.  The 
> Apache rules 
> > serve a good purpose, to prevent shoddy releases.  But at 
> this point, 
> > we've got a major release hanging fire on (frankly) some relatively 
> > obscure supporting packages which aren't even used by the 
> majority of 
> > the user community.
> > 
> > If I were benevolent dictator for a day, I'd do a 1.1 RC2 
> now with the 
> > FileUpload Beta 2.  But, since we live in an enlightened 
> society, I'm 
> > putting it up for a vote.
> > 
> > As we've been reminded recently, this type of voice is 
> non-veto-able, 
> > lazy majority
> > 
> > SO:
> > 
> > +1 - Yes, release Struts RC2 with FileUpload 1.1 Beta 2 once Martin
> > releases it.
> > 
> > 0 - Eh
> > 
> > -1 - I prefer to delay Struts RC2 until FileUpload is in final 
> > release.
> > 
> > The 72 hour voting cutoff is 3AM Eastern June 1
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ted Husted,
> Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to