Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Robert Leland wrote: Try to remain civil if not professional. "If you can't be good, be careful." I said Morning after the night over tequila sunrise IV. Now where is that AlkaSeltzer? -- Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: > You must have some big balls, then? Try to remain civil if not professional. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Chris Trawick wrote: Hello World What? Actually not. Perhaps your experience with job placement services is different from mine, but even in the best of times they're brutal. Downright brutal. I hate them. They did good for me but they've screwed over several friends of You must have some

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

> Ehh... Externalizable extends Serializable, so it still holds that only > objects of class that - directly or indirectly - implement Serializable can > be serialized. Darn. And here I thought I had a good excuse to waste an afternoon. > As for placing an otherwise non-serializable object into a

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

- Original Message - From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > You can also use the Externalizable interf

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

members). Good rule of thumb: don't serialize anything that's isn't a Serializable object. BAL From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'&qu

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

You can also use the Externalizable interface as well as place any object in an array and serialize the array. Mark -Original Message- From: Brian Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- Only

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

It may be difficult and unpredictable, but you can do it. -Original Message- From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:38 PM - Original Message - From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

h" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:30:30 -0500 He was probably confusing serializable w

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

- Original Message - From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:30 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > He was probably confusing serializable wit

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

He was probably confusing serializable with default synchronization. Any Java object can be serialized. -Original Message- From: Attila Szegedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:49 PM Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine. Attila. - Original Mess

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Whoa! Grab a beer and www.oddtodd.com, dude. You are way too serious! -Original Message- From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:49 AM > So...what IS the difference? Well, for one thing, trying to do "vectorInstance.put(key, value);" won't comp

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

"Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > I think "NoSect" may have meant "synchronized". > Unlike the new collection implementations, Vector is *synchronized*. > &

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

chronized*. - Original Message - From: "Attila Szegedi" To: "Struts Users Mailing List" ; Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine. > > Attila. > > - Original Mes

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Mark, HashTables should never be worn after Labor day. - Original Message - From: "NoSect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:30 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > Vectors are also serializedhasht

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine. > > Attila. > > - Original Message - > From: "NoSect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Wrong. Hashtables are serializable just fine. Attila. - Original Message - From: "NoSect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > Vectors are also serializedhasht

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Vectors are also serializedhashtables not. > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > > > So...what IS the difference? We

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

James I think he was being sarcastic (for a change!) Oops, more sarcasm. >-Original Message- >From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:49 AM >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' >Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- &g

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:29 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear-- > > > So...what IS the difference? Well, for one thing, trying to do "vectorInst

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

So...what IS the difference? -Original Message- From: Peter A. Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 8:47 PM spontaneous recruitment, and that was back in the dotcom bubbling days. Naivety and stupidity is even more prevalent now. People with write 4 1/2 years

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

> It just appears to me that althought they were pulling the apex > recruiter's leg, it could be interpreted that they are unsympathetic > to people who are staring depressing hard at the their very last > month of money left before the house gets repossessed by the > mortgage company and law cou

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

Joe Barefoot wrote: Hello World As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a different cal

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

> > Hello World > > As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am > wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little > foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag > the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a > different call sign

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

> Hello World > > As some one who spent a several months out of work last year I am > wondering just what this guy did wrong? Perhaps he was a little > foolish and his prose was a tad bit contrite, but he did flag > the subject as out-of-topic [OT]. Maybe he should used a > different call sign [JOB

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

James Mitchell wrote: I had six of them suckers going one time.had to stop when I started yanking out furthey're not as cute with missing patches of hair. -- James Mitchell P.S. I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING - Original Message - From: "Chappell, Simon P" <[EM

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

H...that's about 3 cases of good beer per referral. Okay, count me in! For every candidate you glean from http://www.lincolntech.com/locations/columbia.html I expect 3 cases of respectable English ale or Irish stout. I had another URL, but I can't find the matchbook. Mark -Original Mess

RE: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

You're having baby goats??? The imagination explodes -Original Message- From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:17 PM P.S. I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additi

Re: [OT] Not spam...I swear--

I had six of them suckers going one time.had to stop when I started yanking out furthey're not as cute with missing patches of hair. -- James Mitchell P.S. I case anyone is wonder..I AM KIDDING - Original Message - From: "Chappell, Simon P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "St