[Sugar-devel] aslo caching

2009-03-04 Thread David Farning
Are there any php experts around? I changed some .po files in activites.sl.o and then rebuilt the .mo files. After flushing memcache the changes were visible. Now for some reason, the changes seem to have reverted. Is it possible that the old information is being cached somehow? david

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, wrote: > for known hw, but _remembering_ a fast path for _any_ hardware. > i.e., if you've booted 10 times and never found ipv6, and always > found the same 3 filesystems in the same partitions, maybe it's > time to stop expecting anything else.  does udev remember

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers needed: grab keys and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
wade wrote: > Cool! I'm looking forward to trying this when I get back to my XO > I wonder though, is there a reason this has to be a separate daemon, and > can't just being part of the HPGK driver with a /sys/... interface for > control? it's a daemon very largely because much of the cod

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
martin wrote: > In fact, this might be something that upstream wants to think about in > a generic sense. All the boot-in-5s focus lately is a lot of fun (and > great for end-users, I surely want _my_ boxes to boot in 5s), but > depends in part on skipping a lot of poking and waiting for hardwa

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM, wrote: > now that it's been pointed out that most of the cat processes > were from bootchart itself, i highly doubt there will be Heisenbug :-) even then, it does give you fairly good idea of what's up during boot. SoaS is meant to run on any hw out there, and a

Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Caroline Meeks
Boots for me! The first two activities I tried worked. Can't connect to the wireless network but I think that might be a problem wiht my wireless. Not ready to call it a Sugar bug yet. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi folks, > > a new soas-2 snapshot is ready for yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
bobby wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, wrote: > > the shell is really pretty fast, if you can keep the number for > > spawned processes to a minimum. > > this sounds like a super headache to get upstream, but with a possibly > significant payoff. are the scripts you're talking ab

Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Ton van Overbeek
Generated the usb stick on Windows using liveusb-creator 3.2 with the '-x' option to get the boot/olpc.fth file. Edited the olpc.fth file to get rid of the extraneous backslashes (Luke already fixed this in git, but no updated windows version of liveusb-creator has been created yet). First tried t

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, wrote: > wade wrote: >  > These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!).  The whole thing >  > probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though.  I wonder >  > what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart.  I also wonder if it > > i

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers needed: grab keys and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Cool! I'm looking forward to trying this when I get back to my XO I wonder though, is there a reason this has to be a separate daemon, and can't just being part of the HPGK driver with a /sys/... interface for control? Best, Wade On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:45 PM, wrote: > sorry about that.

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 23:49, p...@laptop.org wrote: > bert wrote: >> >> Just tried it on my XO at build 800 - works like a charm, both the >> scrolling and rotation. Yay! > > great! > >> >> The only nit I have to pick is the inverted direction of scrolling. >> With both a scroll-wheel and my MacBook's

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
bert wrote: > > Just tried it on my XO at build 800 - works like a charm, both the > scrolling and rotation. Yay! great! > > The only nit I have to pick is the inverted direction of scrolling. > With both a scroll-wheel and my MacBook's "two-finger" scroll, moving > down does scrol

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 23:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 04.03.2009, at 22:25, Paul Fox wrote: > >> last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys >> on the XO keyboard. >> >> a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice >> if the action of the touchpad rotate

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 22:25, Paul Fox wrote: > last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys > on the XO keyboard. > > a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice > if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the > same way that the dpad keys

[Sugar-devel] OT: GSoC from Peru :$

2009-03-04 Thread Carlos mauro
I am planning a small talking at my university about GSoC. It is in Lima Perú. I'll take some data on the web GSoC and the most interesting projects i saw like zikula, olpc, opencv, gnome, python, and others. I explain about my experience, though i did not finished my project last year. I hope my p

Re: [Sugar-devel] (no subject)

2009-03-04 Thread Brian Jordan
Paul, On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:29 PM, wrote: > [resend from subscribed address] > > last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys > on the XO keyboard. > > a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice > if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen

[Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Paul Fox
last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the same way that the dpad keys do). since my daemon was already looking at every in

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers needed: grab keys and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
sorry about that. replying to add a subject... i wrote: > > last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys > on the XO keyboard. > > a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice > if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the > s

[Sugar-devel] (no subject)

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
[resend from subscribed address] last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the same way that the dpad keys do). since my daem

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs BugSquad meeting REMINDER (04 March, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-03-04 Thread Frederick Grose
Meeting: Bug Triage, 04 March 2009, 09:00-11:00 EST (14:00-16:00 UTC), at irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting Meeting: Sugar Developers, 04 March 2009, 11:00-13:00 EST (16:00-18:00 UTC), at irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting (for Gmail users add to Calendar Smart links) Note: Beware of time zones, Goog

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:17:19PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers wrote: > >> I think there are configuration options somewhere, as I seem to >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:17:19PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers wrote: >> I think there are configuration options somewhere, as I seem to >> remember that Chrome on Andriod (based on webkit) can be configured

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:06:26PM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> [1] Pages like http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx >> demonstrate how WebKit-based browsers in the past have stru

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: >>>On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On W

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: >

[Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Hi folks, a new soas-2 snapshot is ready for you! Go and grab it NOW from here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas-200903041854.iso It's important for us to get as much feedback as possible now, since with the recent release of Sugar 0.84, we're also approaching a release of S

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread ,Josh williams
Eben Eliason wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Hi Josh, >> >> I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: >> >> - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups >> and reach an agreement with them after a number if

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt wrote: > Hi Eben, these look great--very promising, and a nice way to envision > extending the visual language of the static web site to other Sugar > Labs microsites. I'll take a closer look at the layout and typographic > treatments tonight,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:01 PM, ,Josh williams wrote: > Eben Eliason wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Josh, >>> >>> I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: >>> >>> - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Christian Marc Schmidt
Hi Eben, these look great--very promising, and a nice way to envision extending the visual language of the static web site to other Sugar Labs microsites. I'll take a closer look at the layout and typographic treatments tonight, more soon... Christian On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Eben Eliaso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Looks nice and clean! My only comment is that Download does not look enough like a button. It looks more like a continuation of the header. The position and size of the button in addition to the lack of additional styling both contribute. Best, -Wade On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Eben Eliaso

Re: [Sugar-devel] Quick question - gtk focusing

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hey Emiliano, It depends on what value you return from your key_press_event handler. If you return False (the default), the event is passed on to other event handlers including the keyboard navigation one. If you return True, no other event handlers will be processed so keyboard navigation will be

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Martin Dengler wrote: > > Does anyone know if SoaS uses JFFS2 compression? > > For the XO nand images, it does. Last time I heard SoaS images were down to ~400MB. Perhaps we should consider disabling JFFS2 compression for performance? 600MB should be plenty to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread ,Josh williams
Hey Tomeu, Nice work on a.sl.o, its looking very functional. Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi Josh, > > I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: > > - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups > and reach an agreement with them after a number if ite

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: >>>An informal test showed that Browse in sugar-emulator used 100MB

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Brian Jordan
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:34, Brian Jordan wrote: >> Tomeu, >> >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > It'

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:04, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > I just tried adding ViewSlides-4.xo to ViewSlides and it reports a > successful add but when you look at the actual entry for View Slides there > are no files to download.  This is what happened to me before.  Read Etexts > does have

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:34, Brian Jordan wrote: > Tomeu, > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: It's working now, right? >>> >>> Still not working for me --

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:34, Brian Jordan wrote: > Tomeu, > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: It's working now, right? >>> >>> Still not working for me --

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Brian Jordan
Tomeu, On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> It's working now, right? >>> >> >> Still not working for me -- has anyone been able to upload a .xo >> bundle in the past th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread James Simmons
Tomeu, I just tried adding ViewSlides-4.xo to ViewSlides and it reports a successful add but when you look at the actual entry for View Slides there are no files to download. This is what happened to me before. Read Etexts does have a file to download, so whatever happened was after that was

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (04 March, 2009 - 16.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hey! let's meet tomorrow for another developers meeting. AGENDA: a) 0.84.1 - We want to do a 0.84 coordinated bugfix release. Let's find a date for that (we welcome packagers input here to sync as most as possible with the distributions shipping dates). And any other item we need to discuss a

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs BugSquad meeting REMINDER (04 March, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hey, let's meet for another round of Bug triaging. 0.84 was just released - a great moment to clear the bug database a bit. It would be good to have the latest Soas (I will announce a new one today) prepared to verify bugs. Regards, Simon PS: Watch out the new time. First we triage bugs a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: >>I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106.  Surf is >>basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped ou

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:04, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > I just tried adding ViewSlides-4.xo to ViewSlides and it reports a > successful add but when you look at the actual entry for View Slides there > are no files to download.  This is what happened to me before.  Read Etexts > does have

[Sugar-devel] Quick question - gtk focusing

2009-03-04 Thread Emiliano Pastorino
Hi everyone! I'm writing an activity that uses left, right, up and down keys and four buttons which I want to associate to a key_press_event. My problem is that when you press the up arrow a few times, you get focus on the activity toolbar, and then if you press left or right, you get focus throug

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> It's working now, right? >> > > Still not working for me -- has anyone been able to upload a .xo > bundle in the past three days?  If so, a temporary workaround could be > having someone els

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Martin Dengler
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:19:08AM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing > probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder > what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I think the first two charts

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
wade wrote: > These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing > probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder > what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it i did some looking, and while i don't think i've found

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Brian Jordan
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > It's working now, right? > Still not working for me -- has anyone been able to upload a .xo bundle in the past three days? If so, a temporary workaround could be having someone else upload the bundle to kickstart the process. > Regards, > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it would be possible to defer network initialization until after the GUI comes u

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:03, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi Josh, >> >> I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: >> >> - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups >> and reach an agreement wi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mozilla Add-ons: FlipSticks Nomination

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Oh, nice - I would rather use RSS feeds than get email. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 01:09, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > I actually like the idea that the community gets some notice when > something > > new is posted to a.sl.o. > > Remora has RSS feed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi Josh, > > I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: > > - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups > and reach an agreement with them after a number if iterations. Christian and I both

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose-0.84 Branching

2009-03-04 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Morgan Collett wrote: > sugar-presence-service, Chat and Read have been branched for sucrose-0.84. TurtleArt and InfoSlicer have been branched for sucrose-0.84 as well. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bobby Powers wrote: > I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106. Surf is > basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped out, and > replaced with the WebKit renderer. > > Obligitory screenshot: > http://dev.laptop.org/~bobbyp/surf/surf_1.png > > Feeling adventurous? well yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: >I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106. Surf is >basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped out, and >replaced with the WebKit renderer. > >Obligitory screensho

[Sugar-devel] Easier X app sugarization (was Fwd: Making activities close from the sugar frame)

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
I should have changed the subject earlier - my comment was not about the window closing, but about a generalization of Bibek's patch to simplify sugarization of regular X apps. - Bert - On 04.03.2009, at 11:41, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Btw, at least in Sugar 0.84, this is already fixed. I can s

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose-0.84 Branching

2009-03-04 Thread Morgan Collett
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 19:02, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Dear Sucrose Maintainers, > > after the final release of a module, a branch should be created to host > further stable development. To keep live as simple as possible (yeah it > is more work to maintain multiple branches) it is up to the main

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
It's working now, right? Regards, Tomeu On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:07, David Farning wrote: > Brian, > James Simmons had a similar problem with one of his activities last > week.  Will look into it as soon as I can. > > david > > 2009/3/1 Brian Jordan : >> I was able to upload Pippy to aslo succ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Making activities close from the sugar frame

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Btw, at least in Sugar 0.84, this is already fixed. I can start from terminal a normal X app and clicking on the Close option in the palette will close it properly (should be the equivalent to clicking the X button in most window decorations). HTH, Tomeu On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:45, Bert Freud

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Josh, I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups and reach an agreement with them after a number if iterations. - implement your design in activities-devel.sugarlabs.org and ask the community for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mozilla Add-ons: FlipSticks Nomination

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 01:09, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I actually like the idea that the community gets some notice when something > new is posted to a.sl.o. Remora has RSS feeds, btw. Regards, Tomeu > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:56:50AM +

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar Community, this is the Final Release in our 0.84 development cycle [1]! Thanks to our testers the developers were able to bring in bug fixes to stabilize the platform. And the translators were busy to get all the strings translated. All the details what have changed from a user point

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106. Surf is basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped out, and replaced with the WebKit renderer. Obligitory screenshot: http://dev.laptop.org/~bobbyp/surf/surf_1.png Feeling adventurous? well you can test it out yourself on a Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose-0.84 Branching

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Wade Brainerd wrote: > To save effort for smaller modules, would it make sense to create the branch > the first time a 0.84 patch is made? > > Best, > Wade 1. This call only applies to Sucrose modules. Regarding activities those are the Fructose ones and I would say the Honey ones as well. Of co

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.84.0

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bobby Powers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> == Source == >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.84.0.tar.bz2 >> >> == News == >> >> Catch all exceptions while saving #224 >> Listen for map in Window instead of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-100 (8.2.1 only)

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> this is Browse for Sucrose 0.82 or OLPC 8.2.1. >>> >>> XO-bundle: http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~erikos/bundles/Browse-100.xo > > Fantastic - I had missed the announcement last week. Does this get > published anywh