On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:48:39PM -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
Hello everybody,
This afternoon, I had an interesting conversation with a Montessori teacher,
about Speak. She asked me why Speak says a when a is pressed and not the
*sound* of the letter a. Montessori teachers teach the shape
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 03:47:23PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:42, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
At the end Journal Plugins mutated to Frame Panles feature.
All UI visible changes I wanted to implement in plugins could be done
via Frame
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:34:38PM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
At the end Journal Plugins mutated to Frame Panles feature.
All UI visible changes I wanted to implement in plugins could be done
via Frame
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:19:51PM -0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:25, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, I have
strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
which develops sucrose - glucose(core
purposes
so, users on any distro can install last development release of sugar
by trivial gestures - copy past 0install url and click OK
Icarito
2009/12/14 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:01, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009
, Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, I have
strong intension to switching development focus from core team,
which develops sucrose - glucose(core) and fructose(some core
activities) to wide range of developers/doers thus some kind
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
I've coded[1] initial implementation[2] for standalone 0install mode,
w/o any support from shell. So, activity could bundle saccharin module
to .xo
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:48:19PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
I've coded[1] initial implementation[2] for standalone 0install mode,
w/o any support from shell. So, activity could bundle saccharin module
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 06:28:40PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Justin,
On 12 Dec 2009, at 16:17, Justin Lewis wrote:
I am not the author of Bundle. If people would like to test it, fine by
me. This was written mainly to get some sort of file transfer system on
the olpc. Another
..and making my thoughts more clear :)
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 06:28:40PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
2). As a separate activity it can be developed out side of the Sucrose
development/release cycle and team.
that was another reason for Plugins proposal(now Shell Integration API)
3) As a
Wade, could you prepare shell agnostic code,
it could be utilized in saccharin to report problems while
downloading/compiling, so having the same UI would be useful.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
Hi all,
Here is my feature proposal for Sugar Problem Reports.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:43:57AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Wade, could you prepare shell agnostic code,
it could be utilized in saccharin to report problems while
downloading/compiling, so having the same UI would be useful.
btw that could be another point for Shell UI Integration proposal
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:31:53AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
It is time for me to create a mailing list for the Karma SIG. I would prefer
to use a google group over using the mailman lists because is it easier to
search the google group. What are the pros of using mailman (
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:52:05AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:31:53AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
It is time for me to create a mailing list for the Karma SIG. I would prefer
to use a google group over using the mailman lists because is it easier to
search the google
Hi all,
At the end Journal Plugins mutated to Frame Panles feature.
All UI visible changes I wanted to implement in plugins could be done
via Frame Panle components(the rest of code are shell agnostic).
Frame Panles feature has the same major idea, social context - giving
non core developers
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:02:45PM -0200, Javier Valenzani wrote:
I'm trying to install an instance of ASLO following this guide at the
Wiki
(http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Devel/Installing#Install_server).
I've installed all packages, configured Apache, MySql, clone the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:43:56PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
Summary: It would facilitate the packaging of Sugar activities into
RPMs and DEBs if there were additional information available in the
activity.info file.
Details: In walking the process of creating an RPM of one of my
mentioned CartoonBuilder's code, affects only to current process
(FWIW, I'm really surprised that gtk.Scrollbar doesn't allow for varying
scrollbar width.)
Art Hunkins
- Original Message -
From: Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
To: Art Hunkins abhun...@uncg.edu
Cc: sugar
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 12/07/2009 01:09 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 12/07/2009 05:58 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
The core idea of plugins is exactly to avoid situation when we have
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Sean DALY wrote:
Activities for Sugar
Customize Firefox, Thunderbird, and other Mozilla products with
thousands of free extensions and themes.
activities.sugarlabs.org/ -
the
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 12/07/2009 05:58 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:56:09PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
2009/11/27 Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:01:16PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:09:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Sorry I didn't enter into the other discussions about your features yet;
I'm having quite a hard time understanding most of what you write. Would
be nice if you
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:24:14PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:01:16PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:09:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Sorry I didn't enter into the other discussions about your features yet;
I'm having quite a hard
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:37:07PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/28/2009 05:00 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Aleksey,
thanks for proposing this feature!
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/TableView_Widget
GTK widget to replace gtk.TreeView in Journal.
Benefit
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:56:09PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 6 Dec 2009, at 21:19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
2009/11/27 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature
Hi all,
I've created a stub feature page[1] for actions metaphor.
Could someone, who are original initiators(or have ideas) of this
feature, tweak wiki page to cover all workflows that they have
in mind for Actions in Journal.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Actions
--
Aleksey
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. Some of them
could be implemented in 0.88 partially, some are invasive, some not.
We lost possibility to push several such features in 0.86 and we have
a chance to do it once
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. Some of them
could be implemented in 0.88 partially, some are invasive, some not.
We lost possibility to push several such features in 0.86 and we have
..to continue summarising..
In fact, all proposed features are not about increasing complexity
but about decreasing for floor level - user all time works with sugar
objects(activities, activity objects, foreign object etc) but from
different views. And let developers/deployments/teachers
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 21:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 20:02, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
When deleting an object from the Journal that is an activity bundle,
we
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.87.1.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Make reading version file more robust (sayamindu) #1562
* Use gobject_timeout_add_seconds to make power usage more efficient
(sayamindu) #1567
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:08:10PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 21:05, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:54:26PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 01.12.2009, at 20:42, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:34:35PM -0600, dfarn...@sugarlabs.org
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:35:42AM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
I have a new activity
(http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4246) to which I am
about to add sharing. It will hat be pretty straight forward in terms
of simply exchanging game state and mouse clicks, but I want to be
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:34:45PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular objects
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:54:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:34:45PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 22:16 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
include build tools (autocrap
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:10:29PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:50:59PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/30/2009 10:00 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 29.11.2009, at 20:50, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Well, if an activity will work for an older release is not only
determined by the activity version number. For example,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:17:20PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += sugar-de...@]
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:44 -0600, dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Many people have access to the upload directory.
We could mitigate this by using separate groups. We already use a soas
group for soas.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:58:57PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/11/30 Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com:
I disagree that showing activities in the Journal, in addition to
activity instances and MIME objects, will cause confusion. Many
activities are more like content. Activities can be
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:18:47PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/11/30 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com:
This isn't quite accurate. We've been adding some pre-loaded content
to the Journal for quite some time now,
Hi all,
AFAIK OLPC will use 0.84 release and will lack of native sugar updater
but it could be useful idea to keep activities repository in one place.
So, the question is will html page which lists all ASLO activities in
microformat enough for OLPC updater.
--
Aleksey
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:02:15PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Once 0install support gets merged, Sugar Platform should be enhanced to
include build tools (autocrap, c(++) compiler, ...); in that case,
activity authors can also
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 17:15, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 07:13, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:16:30PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 17:15, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 07:13, Aleksey Lim wrote
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 06:59:51PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 28.11.2009, at 17:16, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 17:15, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 06:08:53PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 06:59:51PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 28.11.2009, at 17:16, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:24:30PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 17:15, Aleksey Lim wrote
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:57:01PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
From: Sugar Labs Bugs bugtracker-nore...@sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: #1585 UNSP: need some way to present examples to other
activities
Cc: b...@lists.sugarlabs.org
Reply-To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:13:55AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Plugins#
[2] http
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 02:57:57PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
IMO examples belong into the Journal as much (or as few, depending
on your
POV) as activity bundles belong there.
Maybe we should hide them in the default
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 27.11.2009, at 07:13, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1] http
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Zero_Install_integration
The reason for this feature is to cover situations
* an activity has dependencies that weren't included to the Sugar
* Platform
* install/build activity specific binaries
* run non-sugar applications that are not well
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Sugar_Bundles
One file format to transfer various types of content in/out to/from
sugar environment with keeping metadata.
In fact, this feature is an end users oriented(technically we not invent
super format for various types of content, just
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
It seems time to think about the next _big_ technical issue for
growing Sugar Labs. Clearly articulating the Sugar Stack. For the
last year or so, we have been circling the issue with talk of stable
APIs, Glucose, Fructose, and
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:56:42PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:55:20AM -0600, David Farning wrote:
Many of the discussion about this have stalled because of confusion
over what aspect the stack we are trying to define.
As a starting point, I would suggest:
1
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:30:52PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:40:00PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Out of sugar environment, users know that there is only one type of
sugar objects and only thing they should do to activate them is
uploading .xo file to Journal
Hi all,
While preparing new 0.88 features, I encountered some in consistence in
activities vs. activity bundles case, so I'm going to reveal
Activity as regular objects(see [1] ml thread) feature but make it
less invasive in case existed user experience.
Hi all,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/TableView_Widget
GTK widget to replace gtk.TreeView in Journal.
Benefit to Sugar
Standard gtk components are not designed to be lazy. Third party
widgets, I managed to find, uses scheme with renders(like gtk
components), introduced component uses
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:25:12AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:51:55PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:37:31AM +, Carlo Falciola wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:48, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:27, Bastien bastienguerry at googlemail.com
wrote:
Dear all,
I just uploaded Ooo4Kids 0.5.1 on
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 02:49:31PM -0800, Peter Robinson wrote:
On 11/26/09, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:25:12AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:51:55PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian
Hi all,
Want to know what people think about Journal Plugins feature[1]
and particularly that design team think about UI changes[2] involved
in this feature.
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Plugins#
[2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Plugins#UI_changes
--
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:27:57AM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
2009/11/24 Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org:
[...]
I've just tried simple example[1] with simple feed[2] in system w/o
any 0install remains and it fails for the first time[3] but runs ok for 2nd.
I missed something
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
as a follow up on an older thread:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-October/019939.html
- we want to get the versioning sorted in 0.88 for real. So far we came
up with these three options:
a) The
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:21:09PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 11/24/2009 01:42 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:20, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
as a follow up on an older thread:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-October/019939.html
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:57:16PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
this came up several times now. People where wondering what Fructose is.
From the definition it is:
The Sugar developers will need some example set of activities with which
to demonstrate Sugar. This set is Fructose.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:20:27PM +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
2009/11/24 Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org:
Aleksey wrote:
To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
in sugar[1]. To check existed
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:51:55PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:01:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
Aleksey wrote:
To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
Hi all,
Non sugar activities we (could)have on ASLO:
++ programs with high sugar integration(journal etc.)
+ programs that start smooth in sugar environment(sugarised screen mode etc.)
- programs that are just absent in GNU/Linux distributions
-- programs that present in GNU/Linux
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:23:22PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Non sugar activities we (could)have on ASLO:
++ programs with high sugar integration(journal etc.)
+ programs that start smooth in sugar environment(sugarised screen mode
etc.)
btw sugarizing programs only by fixing
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 05:59:44PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 17:30, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:23:22PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Non sugar activities we (could)have on ASLO:
++ programs with high sugar
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:03:24PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 17:30, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:23:22PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
Non
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:51:27AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
repos[2
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...
- Why
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
Hi Aleksey,
On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
wrote:
I've changed
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
- Why is the depcheck happening at first start time? Install time
seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
software, needed
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry or
town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new
activities
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry
or town with internet access
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:46:52PM -0600, Jim Simmons wrote:
Aleksey,
It would be helpful to have a way to distribute things like the
gstreamer espeak plugin you wrote. Fedora doesn't currently include
it. It would be even better if you could distribute versions that
work on the XO
Hi all,
sugar-datastore was branced for 0.86 bug fixes,
master branch is open for 0.88 commits.
--
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:06:05AM -0500, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4090
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.86
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26359/gcompriscontent-12.xo
Release notes:
* GCompris 8.4.13
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
By comparison, Debian have little technical protection against
uploading evil code, but have a social mechanism of only allowing
official members to upload (combined with requiring a large effort
to become official member). I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:33:10PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
Hi all,
To ease Activity Library editors coordination, ASLO will send all kinds
of review requests to new mailing list a...@lists.sugarlabs.org. So,
any editor(and not only editrs) can subsribe to this list and be
informed of all
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
in sugar[1
Hi all,
To ease Activity Library editors coordination, ASLO will send all kinds
of review requests to new mailing list a...@lists.sugarlabs.org. So,
any editor(and not only editrs) can subsribe to this list and be
informed of all reviews threads.
Broadcast editor notifications were removed since
Hi all,
To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
repos[2] and follow simple test case[3].
[1]
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:18:21PM -0500, Art Hunkins wrote:
All is good now.
Prior to this evening, Our Music MC was not showing up as an
activity for me. (I appreciate David having uploaded both
activities, and am sorry the MC version was late appearing.) Now
it is here, and I have
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:35:12AM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Platform_Components doesn't make it
clear. Is csound-python part of the Sugar platform?
In my mind its wasn't part of SP-0.84, we didn't have activities
(at least on ASLO) that use python
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:31:45AM -0500, Art Hunkins wrote:
Attached are the two .xo bundles.
BTW, I created them manually - not with the help of setup.py.
Yeah, that was the problem, valid .xo bundles should contain directory
w/ activity name on top of files hierarchy, anyway the best
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:36:51PM -0500, Art Hunkins wrote:
Aleksey,
I made the change you suggested, as in the attached .xo.
I still was unable to upload, receiving the same message error on
page. The error log is not at all helpful; I uploaded in Win XP,
and the message you indicated
== News ==
* rebase to last AMO code base
* new sugar theme
== News for users ==
* revert fast link to global statistics
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/statistics
(click on activities downloaded at the right top corner on main page)
* bar with links to common sugar resources at the
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:42:50PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote:
If you have a minute please test:
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/
Bugs fixed since last round of testing:
1. # of Activities downloaded number added
2. Fixed pagination for long search results
3.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:42:50PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote:
If you have a minute please test:
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/
Bugs fixed since last round of testing:
1. # of Activities downloaded number added
2. Fixed pagination for long search results
3.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:30:08PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote:
Updates have been made to ASLO, I'm sure there are display bugs floating
around because a lot of the code was changed. Please take a few minutes
to test it out:
http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/
If you're
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:12:24AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38:03PM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote:
I doubt this is a SoaS only problem but I haven't tested it on an XO
Tickets - 1055
I'm going to test Memorize in last soas2(12-Oct-2009)
#1055 is about
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.86.3.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Sporadic freezes while scrolling journal #1506
* Suppress race condition with Journal appearing on sugar startup #1373
* Alt+Space not working to show/hide the tray #1476
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.86.2.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Do not stop processing motion-notify-event #1507
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:38:03PM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote:
I doubt this is a SoaS only problem but I haven't tested it on an XO
Tickets - 1055
I'm going to test Memorize in last soas2(12-Oct-2009)
#1055 is about pulseaudio issue, maybe in last soas it will be better
, 1503
1503 is a
701 - 800 of 1056 matches
Mail list logo
