Re: [sumo-user] modelling pedestrians correctly

2019-08-28 Thread Menno van der Woude
Hey Jakob, maybe it would be possible (and maybe relatively easy?) to implement a dedicated pedestrian detector that reports true if any pedestrians are inside its area that have not moved the timestep before (or the number of those pedestrians). That would be much like an E2 detector. Similar

Re: [sumo-user] modelling pedestrians correctly

2019-08-27 Thread Jakob Erdmann
There is no strong technical reason that prevents E2-detectors from handling pedestrians. It might also be useful to configure it for detecting pedestrians either in forward, backward or both directions. However, that still would not solve the use case of a pedestrian push-button. This is because p

Re: [sumo-user] modelling pedestrians correctly

2019-08-27 Thread Menno van der Woude
Hello Jakob, thanks for your reply. Is detection of pedestrians by E2 detectors a planned feature? Or is it just not meant to function that way. Anyway I noticed that if I use --persontrips true with od2trips, SUMO does not find connections for pedestrians the way I modeled my network now (wi

Re: [sumo-user] modelling pedestrians correctly

2019-08-26 Thread Jakob Erdmann
Hello, E2-detectors currently cannot detect pedestrians. and the only way to implement a pedestrian-pushbutton is by checking the walking direction of the pedestrians explicitly. This is demonstrated in https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Tutorials/TraCIPedCrossing Sidewalks should be modelled with a single

[sumo-user] modelling pedestrians correctly

2019-08-26 Thread Menno van der Woude
Dear all, currently, when modelling pedestrians, I always use 'regular' edges and connections. This results in warnings (such as "Warning: Vehicle type '7' with vClass=pedestrian should only be used for persons and not for vehicle 'ped26'."), and sometimes pedestrians accidentally end up on th