Freenet stable build 5060 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Hi:
Using build 6440, just downloaded n' fred said:
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in queue, 4401 millis since enqueued last
item, 2057 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please
report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel.
java version "1.4.2"
Java(TM) 2
Someone schrieb:
Oh well switching log level from error to normal floods the log with:
(freenet.MuxTrailerReadManager, read interface thread, NORMAL): Unrecognized
trailer ID: 14000 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(*removed*),tcp/*removed*,
sessions=1, presentations=3,1, ID=DSA(*removed*)): outbound
Toad schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:34AM +0100, Someone wrote:
How to get one on Win2k? Would it help if I send you the log file?
Definitely.
Ok, the log is on it's way via private eMail. I also found some of them:
(freenet.support.FileBucket, Finalizer, ERROR): Delete failed on bucket
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:34AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Toad schrieb:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> >
> >>I am getting some of these:
> >>
> >>Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >Does it provide a stack tr
Toad schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
I am getting some of these:
Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it provide a stack trace?
How to get one on Win2k? Would it help if I send you the log file?
Handling
[EMAIL PR
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> I am getting some of these:
>
> Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it provide a stack trace?
>
> Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 6880, stream
> currently at 0 from
I am getting some of these:
Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 6880, stream currently at
0 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=37068, keyOffset=6880,
length=860, cb=null on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: curPos=0, 0 chu
Freenet stable build 5058 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
This looks like one that belong nowhere.
<>___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
>> when the node starts up, the rt gets cleaned, so no bad refs are left.
>> then, while the node is running only good refs are added to the rt.
>>=20
>> then why are connections from incompatible (e.g. stable/unstable) nodes i=
>n the OCM?
>> because they contacted us?
>> then why aren't they reje
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
> >as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable->stable or the ot=
> >her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
> >>
>> then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
>as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable->stable or the ot=
>her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
>> seednodes which contain these bad refs.
>>=20
>> would it be useful if the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:31:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node =
> >refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r=
> >un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20
>> why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node =
>refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r=
>un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20
>
>We do.
oh, good :)
then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt wh
FYI, just in case it's important.
Saw this in my log just now:
14-Jan-2004 22:14:11 (freenet.HighLevelMessageFactory, read interface
thread, NORMAL): Could not parse high level message (132 bytes):
QueryRejected
Attenuation=1
RequestInterval=2.147483647E9
Hops?bve ê8«ïd}SÜå/Doverloaded
Uni
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes
> with connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable
> references, seednodes for unstable nodes with
> stable references,.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes
> with connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable
> references, seednodes for unstable nodes with
> stable references,.
i have seen some stable nodes with connections to unstable nodes, unstable nodes with
connections to stable nodes, seednodes for stable nodes with unstable references,
seednodes for unstable nodes with
stable references, you get the idea. why are stable nodes connecting AT ALL to
unstable n
I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not
at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts).
> [Original Message]
> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 1/14/2004 3:16:32 PM
> Subject: [fr
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:32:38PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> I see on the web interface page:
>
> Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060)
>
> freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp
> as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20)
>
> I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM
I see on the web interface page:
Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060)
freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp
as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20)
I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM or node status pages.
What can cause this?
Kevin.
_
ZoneAlarm will show which Java ZoneAlarm is monitoring. Any of those shown
should be accessible to freenet. Generally do allow Freenet to access the
web. ZoneAlarm has given be no hassles. Since you
are running XP the install for Windows version should behave properly.
> [Original Message]
>
It appears several nodes in the unstable list are running stable, and
several nodes in the stable list are running unstable. Would ALL persons
whose nodes are currently used as seednode sources please contact me and
tell me the URL and which branch it is currently running please.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2
We need more sources of seednodes for the new stable branch. Please mail
me with the URL to fetch seednodes from. It must be accessible from
dodo.freenetproject.org (by IP), but it need not be visible to the rest
of the internet. You can do this by setting:
mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,212.13.
Just download the one with the JVM...
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:42:27AM -0800, Bill Haley wrote:
> Hello, I would like to download and run freenet
> software but I'm given the option of dl'ing the
> software with or without Java 1.4.1.
>
> How can I determine what version of Java I am
> currentl
Hello, I would like to download and run freenet
software but I'm given the option of dl'ing the
software with or without Java 1.4.1.
How can I determine what version of Java I am
currently running so I can choose which download is
correct for me?
I am running Windows XP professional with the free
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:27:01AM -0600, S wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:24:17 +
> Kevin Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
> > think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
>
> I concur. As far as I'
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:24:17AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
> think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
>
> Everyone involved should give themselves a pat on the back and take a
> moment to celebrate - the
Toad wrote:
I don't know. I don't personally vouch for every last bit of code...
Many others contribute to the code.. We cannot establish very much trust
in it anyhow, something might have gone into CVS without a CVS mail
being generated, the CVS-mail generated might not have been noticed yet,
or t
I don't know. I don't personally vouch for every last bit of code...
Many others contribute to the code.. We cannot establish very much trust
in it anyhow, something might have gone into CVS without a CVS mail
being generated, the CVS-mail generated might not have been noticed yet,
or the change ma
Title: Message
No problem reaching www.freenetproject.org from U.S. (earthlink, via Cleveland, etc.)
- Original Message -
From: Niklas Bergh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/14/2004 10:15:52 AM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] simple question
Works fine here
/N
-Original Mess
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:14 -0500
"news.gmane.org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm, well, I can't even seem to resolve the name, now that I have tried to
> do a trace to it... It also seems that one of the other ISPs that I tried
> that didn't work is now working again, to that site... Time to g
Hrm, well, I can't even seem to resolve the name, now that I have tried to
do a trace to it... It also seems that one of the other ISPs that I tried
that didn't work is now working again, to that site... Time to go have a
whack at my DNS admin upstairs =)
-Matt
"S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in me
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:45:37 -0500
"Matt Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot reach www.freenetproject.org to download all the new goodness that I have
> read about on the various mailing lists... Is the site down for some reason, or
> should I look harder on my end? I am having no othe
Brandon Low wrote:
I have e-mailed a thread dump to 2 good devs,
Awww, why not let the evil devs have a go at it too?
;-)
Ian.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Title: Message
Works fine
here
/N
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matt WeaverSent: den 14 januari 2004
13:46To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[freenet-support] simple question
I cannot reach www.freenetproject.org to dow
On my node, 5058 is _grand_ for a few hours, but then it dies a horrible
and painful lock contention death. I have e-mailed a thread dump to 2
good devs, and hopefully they will be able to reduce the lock contention
and then I will join the celebration.
--Brandon
On Wed, 01/14/04 at 11:24:17 +00
I cannot reach www.freenetproject.org to download all
the new goodness that I have read about on the various mailing lists... Is the
site down for some reason, or should I look harder on my end? I am having no
other connectivity issues with my old freenet node, or any other internet
related
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:24:17 +
Kevin Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
> think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
I concur. As far as I'm concerned 5058 is, without a doubt, the best
stable build in mo
After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
Everyone involved should give themselves a pat on the back and take a
moment to celebrate - the war may not be over, but each little victory
is important!
Well done
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:17:04 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged
after
>weeks of development and testing. The network has been reset, so you
>will need to reseed from
>http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref (save t
Yup. This means that the newest item in your datastore has a timestamp
that is larger than what your current system clock says the time is.
Have you modified the clock on the machine or similar recently?
I recommend that you locate those files in your ds that is timestamped
in the future and rese
*sigh*
I got the message about the new build and the reports that it's faster
than the older builds. Yippie!
So, I run update.sh, delete the old freenet.log, touch it, and start the
following command as nobody:
sh start-freenet.sh ; tail -f ./freenet.log
And here is what I find in my log:
Jan
44 matches
Mail list logo
