[freenet-support] Countdown to 0.7.0

I think the lack of a reliable messaging system is really going to impact interest in Freenet. Unfortunately, FMS is not easily usable by ordinary end users, and it is not packaged with the core software. I don't know what to do about this problem, other than figure out some way to get Frost wor

[freenet-support] Countdown to 0.7.0

.8.0. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/7d530b63/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] update and more questions

At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a Win BAT > > file

Re: [freenet-support] Countdown to 0.7.0

I think the lack of a reliable messaging system is really going to impact interest in Freenet. Unfortunately, FMS is not easily usable by ordinary end users, and it is not packaged with the core software. I don't know what to do about this problem, other than figure out some way to get Frost wor

[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

gt; stop it, my account had been silent for almost a minute until I stop the > node... Hmmm, one minute is over the top, I accept that ... long lived spikes can be caused by resending a lot of data to a peer (usually opennet) which has serious MTU problems... I dunno what else... -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/895cabd6/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/f5e6348b/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a Win BAT > > file

[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

ubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/0106bf0b/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Countdown to 0.7.0

It is our intention to release 0.7.0-final late next week. We (myself and ian) would really appreciate any testing you can do. Please test, test, test, let us know of any serious issues, ideally report them in the bug tracker (https://bugs.freenetproject.org), or via FMS if you must remain anon

[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/8039b03f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] update and more questions

U, memory, storage and > bandwidth settings. The server has two 3.6 GHz Xeons and 4 Gb RAM, > and I could spare 100 Gb RAID 10 storage and maybe 50 KiB/sec output bandwidth. Sounds nice. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/d2539f36/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

On Tuesday 29 April 2008 16:36, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Matthew Toseland a écrit : > > On Tuesday 29 April 2008 11:56, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s > >> upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated co

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

Matthew Toseland a écrit : > On Tuesday 29 April 2008 11:56, Julien Cornuwel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s >> upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer >> so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal oper

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

On Tuesday 29 April 2008 11:56, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s > upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer > so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal operations, I've > got no problems. B

[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

Hi, I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal operations, I've got no problems. But when it comes to online gaming, weird things happen : Other pla

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a Win BAT > file that > facilitates running multiple instances with