Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's wh
Toad writes:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
With the the latest stable builds, my "java hanging" problems have gone
away (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage collect
due to the leaks; it's a bug in the jvm, certainly, but it seems it's been
Toad schrieb:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have been really good already ..
They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run
unstable, because it's
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which
> still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much
> faster).
Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;)
mihi
__
Michael Schierl schrieb:
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which
still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much
faster).
Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;)
I get many of these
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get many of these (using FIW 0.08):
>
> #11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42]
>
> they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max
> connections number of 100.
Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's
Michael Schierl schrieb:
Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's guide to
the galaxy"?) is just a code for "bad things happend" as any other
combination of at least twice 42.
In that case it means that an insert returned a DNF message which is
invalid according to the spec and
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I also get quite some of these:
>> >
>> > java.io.IOException: Premature end of stream
>> >at fiw.fcp.FCPMessage.readMessage(FCPMessage.java:34)
>> >at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream(FCPConn.java:263)
>>
>> Hmm. Why does fred close his connections prema
Michael Schierl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, after a few tests (replaced Fred by a simple prog that says
> nothing but disconnects on a keypress) i can see that I get an
> IOException like the one above when the connection is closed from the
> peer, but a ConnectException when I run into
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, this bug is really somewhere inside freenet. Either the accept()
>> call was not handled quick enough (dunno how accept is called in nio)
>> or Fred really closes open sockets without having sent any data.
>
> Consistently? Can you write me a test case?
Si
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> Toad writes:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> >>My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
> >>stable builds have been really good already ..
> >
> >They have? In what
You don't get lots of RNFs?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> Toad writes:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> >>My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
> >>stable builds have been really good already
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:31:37AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> Toad writes:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> >>With the the latest stable builds, my "java hanging" problems have gone
> >>away (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage
> >>collect
-Original Message-
From: Joe Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 6:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
Toad writes:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2
nd growing. Cheers to Toad, Ian and
> the rest of the team. Hope I could get broadband and contribute one day :)
> Aryan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 6:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
D]
> Cc:
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
>
>
>
> Toad writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> >> My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess
ay :)
> > Aryan
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 6:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc:
> > Subject: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
>
> With the the latest stable builds, my "java hanging" problems have gone away
> (I figure that they were in an infinite loop trying to garbage collect due
> to the leaks; it's a bug in the jvm, certainly, but it seems it's been
> worked around) and I'm able to fetch information fairly easily. Sure
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:28:10PM +, Toad wrote:
> > Is your dialup connection unmetered? If so, you may be able to run a
> > permanent node. Even if you can't, I suggest you run Frost (with a
> > smallish number of threads perhaps), it is good at generating traffic,
> > to help the node lea
y with some new seed nodes. The obvious thing to do is get a more
modern machine and broadband.
- Original Message -
From: "Aman Pervaiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in f
14MB...sorry about he typo :)
-Original Message-
From: Toad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:50:08PM +0500, Aman Pervaiz wrote:
>
ssage -
> From: "Aman Pervaiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:50 AM
> Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
>
>
> > Yup you are right. Freenet is working better than ever right no
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:16:17AM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote:
> Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I get many of these (using FIW 0.08):
> >
> > #11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42]
> >
> > they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max
> > connecti
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:33:31PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote:
> Michael Schierl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > However, after a few tests (replaced Fred by a simple prog that says
> > nothing but disconnects on a keypress) i can see that I get an
> > IOException like the one above when the c
24 matches
Mail list logo
