Great! Im running 100mbit from a carrier, I have a email into them to see if
they can deliever the subnets via two seperate VLAN's. Im guessing I can
proxy ARP both subnets and should be fine. Ill know more when I hear back
from my carrier.
Thanks for the help everyone, I would of just tried al
Bill Marquette wrote:
Personally, I'd have them drop both subnets down your pipe and just
deal with them on your end.
Yeah, and if that's what they do, you actually won't have to worry about
the gateway address for the other subnet. You can actually use two IP
subnets on the WAN side witho
Hi.
Scott, I remember that the error that it gave was exactly the one that has
commented Bill Marquette, thus seems that rootfs is a problem when
recognizing. I am going to prove with an old image of the Link that has
given Bill and soon I comment to you.
Thanks.
--
"Linux is for people who ha
On 2/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, exactly! Another twist to is acutally then have CARP on top of the whole
> thing for failover firewalls :) I knew I would have to use Virtual IPs, but
> im still confused on how I would define the new default gateway for the
> second subnet,
My systems are similar to Lex. I have run pfSense on them.
To make pfSense working on these, which basically are PC, except
that CF on the secondary IDE, you will need to make two changes:
1. I found that grub is easier to be made pfSense bootable.
FreeBSD bootloader is hit-and-miss for me.
2. M
Thanks... Very simple
Stephane
-Message d'origine-
De : jonathan gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 31 janvier 2006 19:43
À : support@pfsense.com
Objet : Re: [pfSense Support] HTTPS Captive Portal
hi Stéphane,
what you have to do is simply copy the certificates fr
Yeah, exactly! Another twist to is acutally then have CARP on top of the whole
thing for failover firewalls :) I knew I would have to use Virtual IPs, but
im still confused on how I would define the new default gateway for the
second subnet, and also I might have to setup a second LAN subnet so
Not supported at this time:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pfsense-support&m=113276803329883&w=2
--Bill
On 2/6/06, David Barbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have several Lex-System machines which come prepared to work with a CF
> card in them. I have proven to put an image of pfse
On 2/6/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Woops, try this link:
> http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/policybased_multiwan/policybased_multiwan.pdf
>
> On 2/6/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ive been
Yes, please report the exact problem. The embedded image uses a
serial cable so make sure that you have that all taken care of.
On 2/6/06, David Barbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The iso image of pfsense work fine in HD, but in the CF card don't boot...
>
> This night i probe to insta
Hi.
The iso image of pfsense work fine in HD, but in the CF card don't boot...
This night i probe to install a new image in a cf and report the exact
problem.
The Lex-System is a via C3 processor and 3 lan interfaces (rl).
The exact model is cv860A ( http://www.lex.com.tw:8080/product/CV860A.ht
Woops, try this link:
http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/policybased_multiwan/policybased_multiwan.pdf
On 2/6/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ive been running pfSense for about 4 months with a single WAN subnet. I
On 2/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive been running pfSense for about 4 months with a single WAN subnet. I want
> to bring in another subnet from my ISP over the same physical connection. Can
> PfSense support this at all? This new subnet might either be a different
> class then my
Hello,
Ive been running pfSense for about 4 months with a single WAN subnet. I want
to bring in another subnet from my ISP over the same physical connection. Can
PfSense support this at all? This new subnet might either be a different
class then my current (current is /28, might bring in a /24)
What happens when you put a pfSense image in it? Connect a serial
cable up to see the output.
On 2/6/06, David Barbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have several Lex-System machines which come prepared to work with a CF
> card in them. I have proven to put an image of pfsense in the
Hi all.
I have several Lex-System machines which come prepared to work with a CF
card in them. I have proven to put an image of pfsense in them and they do
not have support, but the images of monowall they work perfectly.
¿There is some plan to generate official images for these systems?
If ther
I have 2 interfaces:
1 - WAN - 200.200.200.2/26 - GW:
200.200.200.1
2 - LAN - 192.168.1.1/24
I need on clients on LAN to authenticate via PPPoE server.
I've enabled PPPoE server on VPN menu, choose interface LAN, now is the problem:
- what I need to specify:
subnet netmask?
server address? -
...I was finishing to test it out, but another cvsup_current solved the problem!
Scott, thank you again for your quick response!
Tom
On 2/6/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remove the object directy from /usr/obj* and try over. This is
> related to the make.conf changes that have b
Remove the object directy from /usr/obj* and try over. This is
related to the make.conf changes that have been talked about in the
last couple of days here.
On 2/6/06, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm trying to build a new custom ISO using pfsense developer ed.; this
> is
Hi!
I'm trying to build a new custom ISO using pfsense developer ed.; this
is not the first time I do this, but few days ago I did a
cd /home/pfsense/tools/builder_scripts && ./cvsup_current
and after that, I cannot make an iso anymore.. This is the error:
Building world for i386 architecture
It's IE 6.0 decompressing that if I use Firefox it does download correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:38 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: *SPAM*[pfSense Support] HTTPS Captive
Portal
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
