Not really. It almost sounds like RELENG_6 is not in sync with
RELENG_6_0 but my understanding is that RELENG_6_0 is the FreeBSD 6
release tree so thats what we really need to track.
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ya that install sees the hdd.. before I proceed though
Ya that install sees the hdd.. before I proceed though I'd like to track
down whats the issue, any suggestions?
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 18:42 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Only thing I can think of is install from the old media. We started
> tracking RELENG_6_0 but I would have thought that it sho
Only thing I can think of is install from the old media. We started
tracking RELENG_6_0 but I would have thought that it should have been
pretty much in sync with RELENG_6
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BIOS sees the drive properly and the system can boot enough t
The BIOS sees the drive properly and the system can boot enough to start
decompressing the kernel; the system that works sees this:
acd0: CDROM at ata0-master UDMA33
ad4: 238418MB at ata2-master SATA150
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a
The current OS on the wo
Am 05.04.2006 um 22:51 schrieb Vivek Khera:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Randy B wrote:
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's size and
simplicity; I'm not an NTP hero either, but in my short experiments
today, I find it only "good enough" as far as time quality. You
can't
BTW: that should have been "rndtest" instead of "rdntest". That'll
teach me to commit stuff without testing ;)
Scott
On 4/5/06, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> > Sam suggestede adding kern.rdntest.verbose=0 to /etc/sysctl.conf.
>
On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Sam suggestede adding kern.rdntest.verbose=0 to /etc/sysctl.conf.
I've added it to our file so it should show up on the next snapshot.
It just seems curious to me that the FreeBSD driver for hifn would be
testing randomness of the chip's so
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Randy B wrote:
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's size and
simplicity; I'm not an NTP hero either, but in my short experiments
today, I find it only "good enough" as far as time quality. You can't
One of the most important things in forensic anal
> Joshua, privately I've had interest on this from one other person,
> hopefully they'll contact you to coordinate efforts
That would be me - I'm no BSD developer, but am certainly willing to
muck about with setting up configs for it and such.
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's
*RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-26-2006*
built on Mon Mar 27 00:54:44 UTC 2006
Bug or feature, I do not know.
However, I hooked up the wrong cable to the WAN interface and got an IP
10.0.4.121 from the router itself (LAN) through DHCP and the
gatewayaddress 10.0.4.1 .
I disconnected the LAN wire and hook
Nothing has changed.
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I downloaded the latest version, boot the CD, and when I go to
> install to the hdd, it doesn't see it. Nothings changed on the system in
> regards to hardware, the BIOS sees the drive (SATA), so I'm wondering
> wha
So I downloaded the latest version, boot the CD, and when I go to
install to the hdd, it doesn't see it. Nothings changed on the system in
regards to hardware, the BIOS sees the drive (SATA), so I'm wondering
what might have changed on the OS side to cause this?
-
Ditto. I would like to remain focused on day to day bugs and such
but will be happy to answer any q's.
Scott
On 4/5/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we're somewhat open to this. I personally am partial to
> openntp due to it's small size (can't speak much for the FreeBS
I think we're somewhat open to this. I personally am partial to
openntp due to it's small size (can't speak much for the FreeBSD port
of it) - with that said, as long as I'm not doing the work, carry on.
We'll import whatever good working solution is decided on.
Joshua, privately I've had intere
Yep, already commited. Thanks Angelo!
On 4/5/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> patch to our altq-vlan.diff :) If you replaced altq-vlan.diff with
> Angelo's that's all that was needed.
>
> --Bill
>
> On 4/5/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have updated the altq-vl
patch to our altq-vlan.diff :) If you replaced altq-vlan.diff with
Angelo's that's all that was needed.
--Bill
On 4/5/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have updated the altq-vlan.diff patch, but what is the 2nd patch for?
>
> On 4/5/06, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 4/5/06, Joshua Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD 6.0
> > ls -al ntpd
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 498934 Mar 17 14:47 ntpd
>
> That's ISC ntpd, no refclocks. Given a choice between msntp, openntp,
> and isc, I vote ISC. Open has been known to be abusive to servers in
> the past.
>
>
"Bill Marquette"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msntp and openntp size comparison
pfsense
# ls -la `which msntp`
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 455176 Nov 28 16:29 /usr/local/bin/msntp
openbsd
$ ls -la `which ntpd`
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 38784 Feb 14 23:40 /usr/sb
I have updated the altq-vlan.diff patch, but what is the 2nd patch for?
On 4/5/06, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was having issues build embedded image and narrowed down issue to
> > freesbie
> > part of build preocess.
>
> I think there was some activity on if_vlan.c, and pfSens
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Bill Marquette wrote:
>
> > On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
> >> with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
> >>
> >> -
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL:
ya I've got the CD in the machine and was about to, then I thought maybe
I'd try to figure out whats wrong. Now that are file server has just
taken a partition offline, I'll just reinstall...
thanks Scott.
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 12:28 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Reinstall.
>
> On 4/5/06, Derrick
Reinstall.
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> System stops at
> Trying to mount root from UFS:/dev/ad4s1a
>
> Any recommended recovery methods for this?
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
System stops at
Trying to mount root from UFS:/dev/ad4s1a
Any recommended recovery methods for this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I was having issues build embedded image and narrowed down issue to
> freesbie
> part of build preocess.
I think there was some activity on if_vlan.c, and pfSense's patches are
now removing the last usage of a variable. If you don't remove the
variable declaration too, you get a compiler warning
On 4/5/06, Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just upgrade successfully.
>
> remove and re run the traffic wizard.
> choose the lan and wan interface.
> after wizard finish and done reloading,
> i goto traffic shaper menu and it say rule changes and need to reload.
> so i click the apply changes bu
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
> with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
>
>
> The requested URL could not be retrieved
>
> While trying to retrieve the URL: http://patimg1.uspto.gov/.piw?
>
And remember: Nothing says thank you quite as well as a nice big
donation!
-Original Message-
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2006 10:33 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] kudos to Mr. Ullrich and the rest of the
pfsense contributor
28 matches
Mail list logo
