I’m trying to establish a pptp connection from
my PC (Windows XP) in my office to another remote office.
After a while I get a Windows error message 619.
I am behind a pfSense firewall (BETA3) with NAT and
the remote office is using a m0n0wall v1.22 which terminates the VPN
connection. Is
Unfortunately yes: http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=812,6
This is a very strange bug that is pretty hard to diagnose. Disabling PPTP at
the pfSense you are natting through should temporarily fix the issue.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Ledermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Hi.
I can find the pfSense-1.0-BETA3-LiveCD-Installer.iso.gz file but if I
gunzip it I will end with distribution files. Not the ISO ...
Is everything right ?
[]'s
On 4/18/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> we just got some reports that Beta3 was spotted at the mirr
Hi,
I downloaded the same file and unzipped it on Win XP using WinRAR, it
extracts to a folder then the PFSense.ISO is in the folder. Use that to
create your bootable Disc.
Installed Beta3 this afternoon and using it now.
Kindest Regards,
Craig Roy
Horizon IT Consultants
-Original Message
My fault.
I used winrar and it decompress everything.
I done that with freebsd and i had already burned the iso.
Thanks.
On 4/18/06, Craig Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded the same file and unzipped it on Win XP using WinRAR, it
> extracts to a folder then the PFSense.ISO is
I reflashed a 64MB cf card with the new image. It's O.K. until I've
changed the LAN ip address. After it is done it didn't accepted any
keyboard input from serial console. It is strange. Any other experience
with it? Now I have returned to the latest snapshot, but will try again
in the evening.
Re
I am trying to make an L2TP connection to a remote Sonicwall from behind
pfSense. Yesterday from a dial up connection I was able to establish
the L2TP connection without any issues. Today I am behind the pfSense @
my office and I am not able to make the connection. I am guessing I am
missing
I just noticed my pfSense (now upgraded to Beta3, thanks guys!) machine
multicasting pfsync traffic of biblical proportions. This was a
surprise to me because I don't have CARP enabled on this box. In poking
around in my machine's config file I see the following entry:
- <#>
- <#>
Is this an imported config? CARP config options are located at
Interfaces>Virtual IPs, CARP settings tab. Disable all options there, save and
apply. Does this fix it? Btw, I haven't noticed that behavior with my embedded
beta3 build. Maybe you are running into some kind of upgrade bug. If nothin
Holger,
The WebGUI shows CARP completely turned off, as it should be. The
config file has been with me, more or less, since 0.95 but always on
that machine. CARP had been turned on at one time on that machine,
however it was completely disabled. I suspect that I simply need to
remove the l
Just hit save at the CARP-Settings with all options turned off. It should save
all necessary settings and apply the changes.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:37 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfS
Holger,
Actually, that doesn't work. Hitting save on its own doesn't turn off
the synchronization. Enabling, then saving, then disabling and saving
again, also doesn't turn it off. If I leave it disabled in the WebGUI
and then change the sync interface to WAN, all the sync traffic moves to
There has been a lot of movement between your initial installed version and
beta3. The cleanest thing really would be a reinstall from scratch :-/ but you
might want to wait for scott's or bill's thoughts on this behavior first.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailt
If you are not using CARP/pfSync then it should be bound to the
loopback adapter broadcasting nothing.
On 4/18/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has been a lot of movement between your initial installed version and
> beta3. The cleanest thing really would be a reinstall from scr
Scott,
I agree that that's how it *should* be working, but that's not what's
currently happening on this box. I'd like, very much to stop the
madness without requiring a complete re-install. Am I safe simply
removing the pfsyncenabled tag from my config file or is there more
involved?
-Ga
Should be safe. But then again turning off pfSync should remove the
tag as well.
On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I agree that that's how it *should* be working, but that's not what's
> currently happening on this box. I'd like, very much to stop the
> madness
Yeah and I tried that, it had no effect. And as I said earlier in my
post, I turned it on and saved, turned it off and saved and no effect.
Changing the sync interface, even with synchronization turned off does
have an effect (which it shouldn't IMHO but that's another story).
-Gary
Scott
It appears that upgrading to beta3 has killed my load balancing. I originally had the monitor IPs the same for both gateways but have since corrected that. I am using the gateway on both interfaces as the monitor IP. With the failed load balancing I have also started to notice a failed message appe
It most likely will not "change" the pfsync association until the next reboot.
On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah and I tried that, it had no effect. And as I said earlier in my
> post, I turned it on and saved, turned it off and saved and no effect.
> Changing the sync
So after saving the page with pfsync disabled, I need to reboot the
firewall to completely turn it off?
Scott Ullrich wrote:
It most likely will not "change" the pfsync association until the next reboot.
On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah and I tried that, it had n
We tested this until the cows come home. My suggestion for you is to start over on the load balancing configuration. There must be something in the config that is not liking how LB works now.
On 4/18/06, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It appears that upgrading to beta3 has killed my load balanci
Yep. Why was it on to begin with?
On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So after saving the page with pfsync disabled, I need to reboot the
> firewall to completely turn it off?
>
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > It most likely will not "change" the pfsync association until the next
The slbd errors can be safely ignored for WAN load balancing - I've
replied that elsewhere (forum I believe) and will be cleaning up those
info messages for RC1. I'll need a copy of your /tmp/rules.debug,
/var/etc/slbd.conf, and /conf/config.xml and a netstat -rn output
would be useful to determin
Actually I may have found a bug with this. Are you using virtual ips?
On 4/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. Why was it on to begin with?
>
>
> On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So after saving the page with pfsync disabled, I need to reboot the
> >
You fixed the bug on the pools, works great. The second issue on the
Virtual Servers still exists.
If you have more than 1 pool defined. You will not see both of them in
the drop-down to choose from on the virtual server detail page (both
editing and adding a new virtual server).
Roy
-Orig
Please create a ticket and include as munch info as possible in
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew
Thanks
On 4/18/06, Roy Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You fixed the bug on the pools, works great. The second issue on the
> Virtual Servers still exists.
>
> If you have more than 1 pool defin
This is now fixed.
On 4/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually I may have found a bug with this. Are you using virtual ips?
>
> On 4/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep. Why was it on to begin with?
> >
> >
> > On 4/18/06, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Be careful with CRAP browsers like IE that automatically extract the
file contents on download. The .gz files are considerbly smaller and
we plan to use them goinng forward.
On 4/18/06, Guilherme Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fault.
>
> I used winrar and it decompress everything.
> I
This happens during interface reload operations and shoudl return to
normal after a few seconds. Perhaps you where too impatient during
the load. I should add that this is really apparent when using slow
devices such as Soekris/Wrap's.
On 4/18/06, Ispánovits Imre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
As we do not have NAT-Passthrough for these types of items, I don't
see it working, if at all.
On 4/18/06, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to make an L2TP connection to a remote Sonicwall from behind
> pfSense. Yesterday from a dial up connection I was able to establish
> the L2TP
Sure enough, I synched up with CVS and now everything works properly.
Thanks again for your help!
Scott Ullrich wrote:
This is now fixed.
On 4/18/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I may have found a bug with this. Are you using virtual ips?
On 4/18/06, Scott Ullrich
Ok thanks to Bill's suggestions I have everything fixed and working ok. It seems that Beta3 decided to lookup rules that should have been disabled that I had on my PPtP interface which was and had been for sometime completly disabled. I temp enabled the PPtP interface again and deleted all the rule
This commit addressed that:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=11412
Very strange. If this is a issue still, please reopen the ticket and
include as much information as possible.
Thanks!
On 4/18/06, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok thanks to Bill's suggestions I have everything fixed a
On 4/18/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> we just got some reports that Beta3 was spotted at the mirrors! Get it while
> it's hot and check http://pfsense.blogspot.com/2006/04/beta-3-is-here.html
> for releaseinfo.
Two large bugs were quickly uncovered after beta 3
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the info on the update, but the error msg is back on boot up
stating the Monitor IP is Bad IP address. But no record of it is mentioned
in the System Log and No errors displayed so far.
Time will tell I suppose.
Kindest Regards,
Craig Roy
Horizon IT Consultants
-Origin
Can you clarify the "Monitor IP is Bad IP address" error? I don't
know where you're seeing that (other than during boot).
--Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bill,
Yes it is during boot, Network for WAN and OPT are up then they are pulled
down during Hardware load, then after that Bad Monitor IP Error MSG, then
loads the LAN, WAN, OPT and firewall rules etc.
There is no record of it in the System Log, and it does not seem to be a
problem. Don’t min
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 16:16:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After bootup I would not like to show the pfsense menu. This is a security
risk for me as pressing 8 will give a root shell. I would instead like to
just show a login prompt as with any normal Fr
On 4/18/06, Nate Steffan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> >On 17 Apr 2006 16:16:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>After bootup I would not like to show the pfsense menu. This is a security
> >>risk for me as pressing 8 will give a root shell. I
Craig, based on your screenshots in the forum, you weren't running
Beta3 when you took them. I suspect your issue is related to bugs
pre-beta3 in the load balance code. Can you delete your pools and
recreate them? Thanks
--Bill
On 4/18/06, Craig Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Ye
Sorry Bill, but they are of Beta 3 as I took them this morning when Scott
asked for them.
Kindest Regards,
Craig Roy
Horizon IT Consultants
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AUSTRALIAN RESELLER
FOR
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 4/18/06, Nate Steffan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 16:16:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After bootup I would not like to show the pfsense menu. This is a security
risk for me as pressing 8 wil
42 matches
Mail list logo
