Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-21 Thread Tunge2
but how can we select the tunX interface to add a Static Route to the openvpn interface? Or do we have to add it to the lan interface static routing table?? the problem is that we have a subnet behind the openvpn client that we want to reach?   www.openvpn.net# EXAMPLE: Suppose the client# having

Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-21 Thread Scott Ullrich
You don't. You need to nail up a connection for each subnet. Scott On 6/21/06, Tunge2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: but how can we select the tunX interface to add a Static Route to the openvpn interface? Or do we have to add it to the lan interface static routing table?? the problem is that w

Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-21 Thread Tunge2
just like ipsec?? but with openvpn you have a real interface(tun0) so you can route with it?? 2006/6/21, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: You don't.   You need to nail up a connection for each subnet.ScottOn 6/21/06, Tunge2 < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> but how can we select the tunX interface to

Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-21 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/21/06, Tunge2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: just like ipsec?? but with openvpn you have a real interface(tun0) so you can route with it?? Sure there is but the webConfigurator doesn't support it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: [pfSense Support] ADD more routes to IPsec Tunnel

2006-06-21 Thread Tunge2
:( snif   thank for the answer   2006/6/21, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 6/21/06, Tunge2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> just like ipsec?? but with openvpn you have a real interface(tun0) so you > can route with it??Sure there is but the webConfigurator doesn't support it.

[pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Steve Harman
Hi!   I’m spec’ing up a couple of machines to buy for running pfSense in a CARP-cluster model.  From reading the tutorial, am I right in thinking that this would require a NIC dedicated to the CARP functionality?   We need to provide a number of subnets so combined with the CARP NIC I’m

AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Fuchs, Martin
Well, have a look at multiport NIC's. I've set up my system with 2-port Intel NICs and tried out 4-port NICs too...   They work well and pfSense supports up to 32 NICs...   so there should be no problem for you to get it up and running ! :-)   Martin Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Steve Harman
Superb, thanks Martin I hadn’t considered that.   Regards,   Steve     From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:57 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?   Well, have a look at multiport NIC's.

RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Steve Harman
Sorry to bother the list again – Martin; are you able to post the model number of the Intel multiport NICs you’re using please?  Just to improve my chances of success.   Thanks again,   Steve       From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 20

AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Fuchs, Martin
no problem !   I have in use Intel 2-port NICs, namely those: http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm   but it also should work with "more-port" NICs based on Intel Chipsets (FXP-driver) Adapters supported by the fxp(4) driver include: * Intel EtherExpr

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Brad Bendy
Multiport Intel Pro Gig-e cards work great with the "em" driver, I have only used dual port so far, and on FBSD 5.4, and a pfsense .84 (have no tried on 1.0 Beta4, but I dont see why it would not work) Brad On Wednesday 21 June 2006 10:47, Fuchs, Martin wrote: > no problem ! > > I have in use

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Steve Harman
Thanks for that Martin. As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit NICs (Intel or otherwise). Regards, Steve Cambridge, UK. On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200 "Fuchs, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: no problem ! I have i

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 6/21/06, Steve Harman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for that Martin. As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit NICs (Intel or otherwise). Regards, Steve Cambridge, UK. On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200 "Fuchs, Martin"

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Chris Buechler
Steve Harman wrote: As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit NICs (Intel or otherwise). Look at: Intel PWLA8492MT (dual port) Intel PWLA8494MT (quad port) those should be very common and easy to come by, and will work. I

Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Brad Bendy
Ill also add this: http://inteleval.ententeweb.com/store.asp Thats direct from Intel under the "eval" program, they have added several new adapters since last time I bought from them. When I purchased my last set they were the cheapest I could find! Quad Port Gig-E card is $287damn cheap On

Re: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Vivek Khera
On Jun 21, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Steve Harman wrote:Sorry to bother the list again – Martin; are you able to post the model number of the Intel multiport NICs you’re using please?  Just to improve my chances of success.get the Intel *server* NICs.  These are awesome.  I've had dual-port ones (no idea