Im running pfsense version FreeBSD pfSense.local 6.1-RELEASE-p10 being used as
a business firewall / VPN machine. Users need to be able to VPN in from thier
windows laptops internet and reach a windows machine on the internal network.
Which VPN product on the pfsense platform do you recommend ? IP
Hello,
I have 10 sites with pfsense and openvpn and works very well.
On 7/11/07, Brent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im running pfsense version FreeBSD pfSense.local 6.1-RELEASE-p10 being
used as
a business firewall / VPN machine. Users need to be able to VPN in from
thier
windows laptops inter
OpenVPN works fine
- Original Message -
From: "Brent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 1:25 PM
Subject: [pfSense Support] which VPN do you recommended
Im running pfsense version FreeBSD pfSense.local 6.1-RELEASE-p10 being
used as
a business firewall / VPN
I have seen some discussion on this topic in the past and according to what
I have read, it is supposed to be resolved. However I cannot get it to
work. I know the ftp server is set up just fine because it is fully
accessible from within my LAN (using its LAN address). However, no matter
how I t
Please note that this may not just be a matter of preference to have the second
pfsense box designated as secondary dhcp server. I am also hoping it will
resolve the issue I reported earlier of running out of free IPs from the
dynamic range even before the stash is exhausted. I have completely
Hi,
We are comparing the use of PfSense and Cisco pix to do IPSec tunnels,
firewalling, and QOS.
How does PfSense compares to PIX, on the topic of known vulnerabilities
and corrections?
Regards,
Ugo
-
To unsubscribe, e
This is probably not the recommended method, but I have FTP setup using NAT
port forwards from our public address to the private one with the FTP helper
disabled. I had to setup the FTP server to use a specific range of ports for
the dynamic ports and them forwarded that range to the FTP server
Please clarify. If you are referring to IPS, you get what you pay for
(and in the case of PIX, I'm not convinced you actually do get what
you paid for).
--Bill
On 7/11/07, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We are comparing the use of PfSense and Cisco pix to do IPSec tunne
Bill Marquette wrote:
Please clarify. If you are referring to IPS, you get what you pay for
(and in the case of PIX, I'm not convinced you actually do get what
you paid for).
Is there an history of security holes in these components of PfSense
(PF, IPSec-Tools, QOS)?
Ugo
-
I know of no official audit of our code. Nor have I ever seen a post
to bugtraq, full-disclosure, or anything on secunia. But take that
for what it's worth...nothing.
--Bill
On 7/11/07, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
> Please clarify. If you are referring to
Hello! As the title states, I have a WRAP board with two Atheros cards
running 1.2-BETA-2. Unfortunately, pfSense is only detecting one of the
cards. Monowall is able to detect and use both. Is this a limitation of
pfSense or a bug in this version? Here is the bootup log:
Dec 31 00:00:52
they openly list what versions of what components they use. you would have to
reference the individual authors of said components to find their history of
vulnerabilities.
as for the pfSense people, they have a habit of working and fixing issues with
the core of pfSense pretty soon after you n
Nevermind... please ignore my idiocy... one of my cards is bad... :-(
Tim Nelson
Technical Consultant
Rockbochs Inc.
Tim Nelson wrote:
Hello! As the title states, I have a WRAP board with two Atheros cards
running 1.2-BETA-2. Unfortunately, pfSense is only detecting one of
the cards. Monowal
Am 11.07.2007 um 20:53 schrieb Bill Marquette:
I know of no official audit of our code. Nor have I ever seen a post
to bugtraq, full-disclosure, or anything on secunia. But take that
for what it's worth...nothing.
A code audit of the GUI/back-end would be pretty nice.
But even if the cod
Also, with all of the money that you can save on technician costs and
hardware by implementing something like pfsense, you might be able to
afford an additional layer of transparent firewalling or some other
security hardware/software or redundancy that you might otherwise be
unable to afford.
Oops!!! I didn't realize I had jumped topics. :(
Vaughn Reid III
Vaughn L. Reid III wrote:
Also, with all of the money that you can save on technician costs and
hardware by implementing something like pfsense, you might be able to
afford an additional layer of transparent firewalling or some
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:38 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 11.07.2007 um 20:53 schrieb Bill Marquette:
>
> > I know of no official audit of our code. Nor have I ever seen a post
> > to bugtraq, full-disclosure, or anything on secunia. But take that
> > for what it's worth...nothing.
> >
>
>
if i am site A, and i have an ipsec vpn to site B and site C. right now, i
can ping from A-B, and from A-C (and vice versa). is there anyway to set up
to allow site B to ping site C, without setting up a tunnel between them (ie,
to pass thru site A?
just curious,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfw
I don't think this i possibleit's well posible with
openvpn..
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jonathan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 12 juli 2007 4:30
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: [pfSense Support] spoke and hub ipsec vpn?
if i am site A, and
Dear All,
I am trying to build a commercial Wi-Fi network using pfsense where I
need to have a customized login page and I would appreciate your efforts to
help me.
Please let your answers be after each and every question
1- Can I replace the user login page (the pfsense portal p
On 7/12/07, Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
.
as for the pfSense people, they have a habit of working and fixing issues
with the core of pfSense pretty soon after you notify them of the issue. its
not uncommon for the FIRST response to a problem report to be "try the
snapshot in 2 ho
21 matches
Mail list logo