nothing wrong. just different. it may have side effects, which needs
some thinking.
sai
On 7/7/08, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:47 AM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tested this and it looks like this is a side effect of the new shaper.
> >
>
>
> What'
Are you just trying to change the look of pfsense?
If so you can do this in the current build with themes.
Youll want to SFTP over to the server and browse to
/usr/local/www/themes
(your SFTP login is "root" - your password is the password you set in the
GUI )
Just download one of the existing
Ok guys, thanks so much for your help so far. And I'm doing that for the
company I work in now, but anyway, Why don't you guys start talking about
having "authorized partners and resellers" if so, I guess my company can be
your first "reseller" :)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Chris Buechler <[E
I have 1 VPN client configured and working right.
But when I want to setup other VPN Cliente to run at the same time, I
get the following error and doesn't work:
TCP/UDP: Socket bind failed on local address [undef]:1194: Address
already in use
Exiting
Somebody can help me?
Thanks!
--
Diego.-
Hi Jose,
As what I understand, 1% is the minimum allocated bandwidth. If the
remaining 99% is not used by other queues, this queue may still use up
all 100% of the bandwidth.
In the implementation, if no queues are defined with upper limit, all
100% bandwidth may still be used up. On the oth
Hi there,
I have just ran the Traffic shaper wizard and I have a doubt about the
queues generated and the bandwidth assigned to the different queues.
Considering the wan queues and the bandwidth assigned to them, qwandef(1%),
qwanacks(25%), qPenaltyUp(1%), qOthersUpH(25%) and qOthersUpL(1%), I
I would be extremely surprised if you had access to git.
Yeah, unless you're an existing committer, you have no access to git
just yet. It's firewalled off from the world until it's less of a test
case and more production ready.
Not so shockingly, there also won't be many too keen on provid
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Ahmed Abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to
> PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not
> contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start.
We killed HEAD,
You realize that HEAD is the most distant and non-functional of the
branches and is probably the worst possible candidate for re-branding
and release, right?
Ahmed Abdallah wrote:
I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to
PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked bu
I'm trying to get the HEAD version of pfSense, so I added the HEAD to
PFSENSETAG in pfsense_local.sh. It worked but the resulting iso did not
contain php and the initialization scripts failed to start.
So, I tried to get from git "after restoring PFSENSETAG to RELENG_1_2" by
uncommenting the USE_GI
10 matches
Mail list logo
