On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote:
>
>> > So... if a priorice a host over alll, why if I do a
>> > ping from the priorized hots I have 27 millisenconds,
>> > but when from othre host in the LAN I upload a file,
>> > th
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Jose Hernandez wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Yesterday we had a service launch, and pfSense inbound load balancer let me
> down big time… We have been using pfSense 1.2-release version installed on
> Dell PowerEdge R200 and CARP for redundancy for around a year now, it probe
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Paul
Mansfield wrote:
> suppose we have two WAN ports and have turned on the automatic RFC1918
> and bogon blocking; you can see the grey-ed out rules on WAN1 interface.
>
> what's the best way to also do this on WAN2? in particular, how to put
> the list of RFC1918
Hello,
I need to transparent proxy for my pppoe users.
In squid's config tab, I the pppoe interfaces do not show as options to
the "proxy interfcae".
Is there a way to manually create the proxying rule?
Thank you,
--
Felipe Ceglia - PY1NB
--
Hello,
I need to transparent proxy for my pppoe users.
In squid's config tab, I the pppoe interfaces do not show as options to
the "proxy interfcae".
Is there a way to manually create the proxying rule?
Thank you,
--
Felipe Ceglia - PY1NB
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Jose Hernandez wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ermal Luçi [mailto:ermal.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 12 June 2009 12:48
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy
> load.
>
> Can you please try
-Original Message-
From: Ermal Luçi [mailto:ermal.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 June 2009 12:48
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy
load.
Can you please try a later snapshot after 11062009 it seems you had
problems with sticky-
___
From: Jose Hernandez [mailto:j...@vidzone.tv]
Sent: June 12, 2009 5:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy
load.
Hi,
Yesterday we had a service launch, and pfSense inbound load balancer let me
Hello list,
I was editing config.xml by hand to add system/shellcmd and
system/earlyshellcmd until I noticed the Shellcmd package. When I
started using that on pfSense 1.2.3-rc1 all shellcmds stopped working,
because the Shellcmd package wraps the commands in an additional
-tag, which is not inter
Hello list,
I was editing config.xml by hand to add system/shellcmd and
system/earlyshellcmd until I noticed the Shellcmd package. When I
started using that on pfSense 1.2.3-rc1 all shellcmds stopped working,
because the Shellcmd package wraps the commands in an additional
-tag, which is not inter
From: Tebano epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: June 12, 2009 9:18 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:45 -0400
> From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subj
From: Jose Hernandez [mailto:j...@vidzone.tv]
Sent: June 12, 2009 5:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy load.
Hi,
Yesterday we had a service launch, and pfSense inbound load balancer let m
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:45 -0400
> From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
>
> From: Tebano epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: June 12, 2009 4:11 AM
> To: support@pfsense.co
Hello,
the upstream router had problems accepting the
second IP-Address for whatever reasons. After
resetting that everythings working.
regards, Rolf
On 09/06/09 18:35 +0200, Rolf Kutz wrote:
Hello,
I have a /29 subnet at my WAN. I would like to NAT
two IPs to different hosts with private IP
suppose we have two WAN ports and have turned on the automatic RFC1918
and bogon blocking; you can see the grey-ed out rules on WAN1 interface.
what's the best way to also do this on WAN2? in particular, how to put
the list of RFC1918 and bogons into the rule so that their values are
updated autom
From: Tebano epaminonda [mailto:l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com]
Sent: June 12, 2009 4:11 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:43:31 -0400
> From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject
From: j...@vidzone.tv
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:52:13 +0100
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy
load.
It is fine Tebano,
I appreciate your answer and as you said there are not other
limitations documented no
Can you please try a later snapshot after 11062009 it seems you had
problems with sticky-connections!
Though without analysis i might be compeletly WRONG.
Ermal
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jose Hernandez wrote:
> It is fine Tebano,
>
>
>
> I appreciate your answer and as you said there are
It is fine Tebano,
I appreciate your answer and as you said there are not other limitations
documented nor any other issues I could find anywhere, and I did spend some
time researching
Regards,
Jose Hernandez
Software and Systems Senior Engineer
VIDZONE DIGITAL MEDIA
From: Tebano e
From: j...@vidzone.tv
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:33:54 +0100
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Inbound load balancer performance under heavy
load.
Thank for your response, however the limitations on the featured
list are not the cause of the problem… I am
Thank for your response, however the limitations on the featured list are
not the cause of the problem. I am happy with the load balancer to equally
distribute the load, also happy with the firewall not checking for a valid
response. but there seems to be any other limitation not listed.
Regard
2009/6/11 Webmaster Megastar :
> Can you give us an idea of when it will be available in snapshots released
> to public ?
>
Anything from 20090612 and newer should work (there aren't any yet,
they'll be there eventually). Please t
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:43:31 -0400
> From: evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Multiwan suggestions before v. 2.0 ...
>
> From: Webmaster Megastar [mailto:webmas...@megastar.fr]
> Sent: June 11, 2009 2:35 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
