- Original Message -
From: "Dave Warren"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 5:58 PM
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: multi-wan, multi-lan security
In message Tortise
was claimed to have
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Warren"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 201
In message Tortise
was claimed to have
wrote:
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dave Warren"
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 4:51 PM
>Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: multi-wan, multi-lan security
>
>
>> In message <24b7224eff7c4e19b1a43fd4df416...@dp2000xp> Tortise
>> was claimed
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:51:35PM -0700, Dave Warren wrote:
> In message <24b7224eff7c4e19b1a43fd4df416...@dp2000xp> Tortise
> was claimed to have wrote:
>
> >My ISP advised us not use common private LAN addresses for this
> >(common problem) reason. (I now use randomly generated addresses)
>
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Warren"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 4:51 PM
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: multi-wan, multi-lan security
In message <24b7224eff7c4e19b1a43fd4df416...@dp2000xp> Tortise
was claimed to have
wrote:
My ISP advised us not use common private LA
In message <8c8f0f7add704cf491998cbe298fb...@dp2000xp> Tortise
was claimed to have
wrote:
>Yes I was referring to ARP poisoning and my cable connection experience
>which is the reason for the random (obscure) LAN subnet
>range selection...
It's worth noting that even if you use an uncomm
In message <24b7224eff7c4e19b1a43fd4df416...@dp2000xp> Tortise
was claimed to have
wrote:
>My ISP advised us not use common private LAN addresses for this
>(common problem) reason. (I now use randomly generated addresses)
I do hope you never need to contact the legitimate owner of whatever IP
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buechler"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] multi-wan, multi-lan security
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tortise wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Nathan Eisenberg"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 0
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Tortise wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Nathan Eisenberg"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] multi-wan, multi-lan security
>
>
>>> Say I'm not being routed a /24. Say I'm on Comcast and I have a
>>>
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Eisenberg"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] multi-wan, multi-lan security
Say I'm not being routed a /24. Say I'm on Comcast and I have a 192.168.0.0/24 LAN. The problem is now even bigger: your
carrier
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
>> You're missing the entire point. If you have one switch, VLAN 2 is
>> your LAN, and VLAN 3 is your unfiltered Internet, and you put both 2
>> and 3 untagged on the same port... there ya go. From there the amount
>> of damage possible and e
> You're missing the entire point. If you have one switch, VLAN 2 is
> your LAN, and VLAN 3 is your unfiltered Internet, and you put both 2
> and 3 untagged on the same port... there ya go. From there the amount
> of damage possible and ease of it happening depends on what kind of
> Internet connec
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
>>That's poetry.
>
> It might be, if it were true. I'm not sure that it is, though.
>
> From a distribution layer (/30 for routing to a firewall from a router), I
> can't think of what you'd need to intentionally do to allow bypass of the
>That's poetry.
It might be, if it were true. I'm not sure that it is, though.
From a distribution layer (/30 for routing to a firewall from a router), I
can't think of what you'd need to intentionally do to allow bypass of the
firewall that has anything to do with VLANs. If I somehow moved t
The "stable" one would not let me add a backend, it kept telling me that
"weight" was mandatory even tho I was entering a number for it. The
other one seems fine.
Thanks,
Josh.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 August 2010 06:42
> To: su
Hi
I tried to do it but didn't work
I solved this using the blacklist on the proxy server adding the word
iloveim.com
Kind regards
Tiago Picon
DESENVOLVIMENTO
Scenario - Automação Residencial
(16) 3368-3399 - São Carlos
tpi...@scenario.ind.br
www.scenario.ind.br
-Mensagem original-
Hi,
We have setup the squid proxy package for LAN over a pfsense 1.2.3.-RELEASE*
* where NO direct Internet access is allowed for users
It works fine for the LAN users to access Internet / FTP through IE /
Firefox with proxy enabled.
The problem is that the LAN user cannot access any FTP server
16 matches
Mail list logo
