Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5
Tim Dickson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
I've searched around and read about others with this issue. Basically
I have 5
Having a problem with vpn setup wondering if anyone else is also??
The VPN software is Cisco.
This is the setup
VPN Client - Ethernet Switch - pfsense - Internet - VPN Concentrator
A client behind a pfsense can use internet, email, everything else just
fine, expect VPN. When i run a packet
-Original Message-
From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
Buechler
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Anything like fail2ban for PFSense?
Mark Crane added a DenyHosts package recently that
iggd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Curtis LaMasters
curtislamast...@gmail.com mailto:curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
Gotta tell you guys...this is out right frustrating. Is it the fact
that I'm using Gmail or that by definition, threading in email is
Can't do layer 4 yet, but i read somewhere some work is being done on
it, maybe in pfsense 2.0.
A sorta work around could be forcing all the clients to use pfSense as
their DNS. Then use opendns.org as your dns resolver. This should
prevent a lot of the torrent and other bad sites from
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product that
works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then a
product that works 50% of the time, with all the features I want.
Adam
Tim A. wrote:
I
Tim A. wrote:
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product
that works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then
a product that works 50% of the time
Curtis Maurand wrote:
[snip]
you need only 2 tunnels for passing 2 subnets from one side to the other
I'm only passing one. and this dinky little config shouldn't need paid
support to happen.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database
...@midatlanticbb.com
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
I guess my real goal is that anywhere a IP address can be used in pfSense, a
MAC address could be used also, but the MAC address would simply be replaced
with whatever it's IP is in the arp table. Of course some things like the
LAN IP, ect
Are there any plans on adding this feature, or MAC to IP Address
tracking. I would be willing to submit an bounty if it's technically
possible.
This is very useful for hotels, airports, wifi hot spots. Where you
want to block an PC that is using DHCP.
I've actually never seen this feature
tracking is handled by the ARP package. :-)
All joking aside, maybe you want to look at static DHCP assignments denying
unknown clients or the captive portal?
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
Are there any plans
address tracking is handled by the ARP package. :-)
All joking aside, maybe you want to look at static DHCP assignments
denying unknown clients or the captive portal?
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
Are there any
icmp
192.168.10.255:54864 - 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:54864 - 192.168.10.255
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.255:60489 - 192.168.10.11
0:0
icmp
192.168.10.11:60489
We had this requirement without using vlans. pfSense is somewhat feature
limited when using vlans.
Cisco can support it without vlans, you'll want to look into the
following commands..
Cisco Switches - switchport protected
Cisco Access Points - Public Secure Packet Forwarding
Adam
Chris
I thought captive portal was limited to one interface, and every vlan
being a interface.
I need captive portal to run on every vlan, if i used it.
Adam
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 9:55 AM, apiase...@midatlanticbb.com
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
We had
I am pretty sure there is not limit on the maximum number of users that
can login into the captive portal. The only thing i can find that this
might be referring to is the Maximum Concurrent connections. I don't
have this set, so i believe it's at it's default of 4, and that's fine
with me,
Is there any reason why dnsmasq 2.46 wasn't added to 1.2.2 releases? We
tried upgrading our 1.2.2 box but were getting some errors for missing
library's.
Thanks,
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
Ntop is pretty cool, i just can't seem to keep it running. It crashes
anywhere from a couple of hours to a day. Any tips?
Running 1.2.1 RELASE, with 512mb memory, 30gb Hard drive, 2.4ghz P4
Processor.
Adam
Jan 3 22:53:58
kernel: fxp0: promiscuous mode disabled
Can't help with your pfsense problem, but it might help to configure
this on your switch.
spanning-tree portfast Configured on your cisco switch will change the
port to a forwarding state immediately.
Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Hello,
I am deploying a new set of firewall boxes using
I had this exact same problem on a Sokrsis 5501 box. I could not find
the files that were taking the space. I actually had RRD graphs
disabled, and it was still full. A reboot would fix the problem
temporally, but after about 30-60mins it would fill up again giving me
all sorts of errors. I
21 matches
Mail list logo
