On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Chris Buechler wrote:
>
> > Andy Dills wrote:
> > > Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in
> > > the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears
> t
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Andy Dills wrote:
> > Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in
> > the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears that a
> > patch to the driver has been created:
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/RELENG
Andy Dills wrote:
Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in
the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears
that a patch to the driver has been created:
http://www.nabble.com/RELENG_7-panic-td16285669.html
that is good news. Do you know
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Chris Buechler wrote:
> There are a lot of crappy Realtek NICs out there, but I'm surprised you're
> seeing this on a HeroLogic board. I use a number of different embedded
> hardware platforms with Realtek NICs, including a HeroLogic HL-462 they
> contributed to the project, a
Andy Dills wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Nope, that's what has me confused. This
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
>
> That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Nope, that's what has me confused. This is all 100mbit, all standard MTUs
On 3/23/08, Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 > max 1514)
That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> > Anybody else experience this or have any theories?
>
> I wonder if this is it?
>
> http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=20798
>
> I went ahead and patched my filter.inc to see if that corrects the issue.
N
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Andy Dills wrote:
> Anybody else experience this or have any theories?
I wonder if this is it?
http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=20798
I went ahead and patched my filter.inc to see if that corrects the issue.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-997
Hi there,
I've got a couple of HL-463 boxes that I've been trying out. They both
came with pfsense 1.2-RC4 installed. They work well for the most part,
however, I have found a reproducable flaw that makes them very crippled.
Hopefully it's resolvable, and I doubt it was fixed in between RC4 an
10 matches
Mail list logo