al Message -
From: "Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
Nope.
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doh!
No better
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
> less than 100k
>
>
> If you are on a embedded image you need to reflash. The mini update
> does not contain freebsd ch
ver does not support altq
>
> and you see what I am getting.
>
> So...
>
> What now?
>
> Todd
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense
whew!!! i was starting to feel like i needed a good stiff drink! :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
belongs.
> >
> > After doing so, I ran:
> >
> > # pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
> > pfctl: ng0: driver does not support altq
> >
> > and you see what I am getting.
> >
> > So...
> >
> > What now?
> >
> > Todd
> > ---
dnesday, October 26, 2005 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
altq on sis1 hfsc queue { qWANRoot }
altq on sis0 hfsc queue { qLANRoot }
Ahahhaha, oops. Looks like
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> altq on sis1 hfsc queue { qWANRoot }
> altq on sis0 hfsc queue { qLANRoot }
Ahahhaha, oops. Looks like I need to put a better check in the wizard
:) I forgot that ng0 isn't what shows up in the XML config, doh. At
this time ALTQ isn't supp
quot;Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed
to less than 100k
Grab the latest version which does support ALTQ on NG0.
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/
Repeat tes
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
Grab the latest version which does support ALTQ on NG0.
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/
Repeat tests and report back what Da
At 05:07 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Hmmm...
Since I turned shaper back off.. I had to turn it back on, I noticed
that my changes to /tmp/rules.debug had gone away so I put the ng0
back on the line where it belongs.
After doing so, I ran:
# pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
pfctl: ng0: driver does no
at now?
>
> Todd
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
> less than 100k
>
>
> >
am getting.
So...
What now?
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 04:51 PM 10/26/2005, y
At 04:51 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
OK, I did it and my link is still hosed.
Do you want me to run any of those commands again or anything else
now that I have reloaded the rules?
yes, please send 'pfctl -sq' now that you reloaded 'em.
---
8 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 04:36 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Reloaded?
How?
after editing /tmp/rules.debug, you need to do 'pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug'
or y
At 04:36 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Reloaded?
How?
after editing /tmp/rules.debug, you need to do 'pfctl -f
/tmp/rules.debug' or your changes have no effect.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reloaded?
>
> How?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re:
Reloaded?
How?
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 04:12 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
At 04:12 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
queue root_sis1 bandwidth 10Mb priority 0 {qWANRoot}
are you sure you reloaded the rules after changing sis1 to ng0?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
thx, i'm looking at it now.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed qLANacks
anchor "qWANacks" all tagged qWANacks
anchor "qVOIPUp" all tagged qVOIPUp
anchor "qVOIPDown" all tagged qVOIPDown
pass in quick on sis0 inet from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state label
"USER_RULE: Default LAN -> any" queue(qLANdef, qLANacks)
At 04:07 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Looks like this now:
scrub on ng0 all max-mss 1452
#altq on sis1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on ng0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on sis0 hfsc bandwidth 100Mb queue { qLANRoot }
--
Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 04:01 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
hmmm, this should have read:
altq on ng
I ran:
'pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug'
with the shaper back on and got no errors at all.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, ki
At 04:01 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
hmmm, this should have read:
altq on ng0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
Should I change it and give it a whirl?
yes, please.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
hmmm, this should have read:
altq on ng0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
Should I change it and give it a whirl?
Todd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kb 1 256Kb) )
#
---
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
also
At 03:56 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
After turning the shaper back on, I do have this already in the file:
altq on sis1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on sis0 hfsc bandwidth 100Mb queue { qLANRoot }
Do you want me to still replace this with yours? Seems to be the
same basically..
At 03:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Here is the file after turning shaping back on and before making the
changes you requested.
Working on the changes now.
Todd
-
# System Aliases
lan = "{ sis0 }"
wan = "{ ng0 }"
pptp = "{ ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5 ng6 ng7 ng8 ng9 ng10 ng11 ng12 ng
-
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
did you turn shaper back off? please turn it on and add the following two
lines
ched by queues
anchor qWANRoot tagged qWANRoot
anchor qWANdef tagged qWANdef
anchor qLANRoot tagged qLANRoot
anchor qLANdef tagged qLANdef
anchor qLANacks tagged qLANacks
anchor qWANacks tagged qWANacks
anchor qVOIPUp tagged qVOIPUp
anchor qVOIPDown tagged qVOIPDown
pass in quick on $lan from 192.168
At 03:50 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Yes I turned it back off, I have to leave it off or my speed is miserable :)
i understand your pain, but no test results with shaping off will be
meaningful.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
6 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
did you turn shaper back off? please turn it on and add the following two
lines before the queue directives (by editing /tmp/rules.debug)
altq on fxp1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
al
also post results of 'pfctl -sq'
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did you turn shaper back off? please turn it on and add the
following two lines before the queue directives (by editing /tmp/rules.debug)
altq on fxp1 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qWANRoot }
altq on vlan0 hfsc bandwidth 10Mb queue { qLANRoot }
NOTE: change fxp1 to your wan interface and cha
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 03:29 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandwidth for WAN and LAN in the gui and see if that
helps.
You mean under "Interfaces>WAN"
om to any port 22 label "sshlockout"
# User-defined rules follow
pass in quick on $lan from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep state label
"USER_RULE: Default LAN -> any"
# VPN Rules
#---------------------------
# default rules
At 03:37 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandwidth for WAN and LAN in the gui and see if
that helps.
You mean under "Interfaces>WAN" and "Interfaces>LAN"?
yes.
OK, I set my WAN to 10mb and my LAN to 100mb. I then turned traffic
shaper back on and did a speed test and no joy, s
ng, can't get past 100k or
so.
I will run the commands you suggested and reply soon.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DS
At 03:34 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
After setting the LAN interface to 100 mb, the screen came back OK
except I saw this at the very bottom of the screen:
ifconfig: not found Warning: unlink(/var/run/lan.conf.dirty): No
such file or directory in /usr/local/www/interfaces_lan.php on line 283
A
?
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 03:29 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandw
At 03:29 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
try putting manual bandwidth for WAN and LAN in the gui and see if that helps.
You mean under "Interfaces>WAN" and "Interfaces>LAN"?
yes.
Are you sure you get no errors when loading this?
Sorry, when loading what?
what happens if you manually type:
pf
uot;Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 03:15 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happ
IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
>
> this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if
you &g
At 03:15 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you
manually type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
Try this:
###
# System Aliases
lan = "{ sis0 }"
wan = "{ ng0 }"
pptp = "{ ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5 ng6 ng7 ng8 ng9 ng10 ng11 n
tized or I
can't us it.
Thanks for the info.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
ng0 <-
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you manually
type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
Try this:
###
# System Aliases
lan = "{ sis0 }"
wan = "{ ng0 }"
pptp = "{ ng1 ng2 ng3 ng4 ng5 ng6 ng7 ng8 ng9 ng10 ng11 ng12 ng13 ng14 }"
pppoe = "{ ng1 ng
At 03:12 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Sorry...
I have it turned off at the moment because it kills my connection speed :)
I guess I have to turn it back on so the info will show up in this file?
yes :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
> less than 100k
>
>
> >
> > this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what
2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you manually
type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
this is really odd. no queue stuff at all? what happens if you manually type:
pfctl -f /tmp/rules.debug
any errors?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------
# default rules (just to be sure)
#---
block in log quick all label "Default block all just to be sure."
block out log quick all label "Def
At 03:00 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
I think this is what you want:
-
hfsc
-
ewww, no thanks. reading raw xml is not fun. as scott said, go to
/tmp and post rules.debug (removing IP addresses etc if you're
worried about security.,,)
--
At 03:00 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Sending /tmp/rules.debug may help show the problem. Sanitize any
personal data before sending (if you don't want your ips shown,etc)
yeah, that's better...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 02:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Also, I tried lower the guaran
At 02:58 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Sure, what would be the easiest way to do this?
Get a shell on your box and do:
pfctl -sq
pftcl -sr
I have nothing more than I mentioned before.. Plain vanilla setup
with just the shaper stuff I mentioned. I don't even have any
firewall rules or anything e
Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
> less than 100k
>
>
> > At 02:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
> >>Also, I tried lower the guarantee to 256k just in case this part of the
> >>proble
tzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, killing my DSL link speed to
less than 100k
At 02:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Also, I tried lower the guarantee to 256k just in case this part of the
problem.
At 02:54 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Also, I tried lower the guarantee to 256k just in case this part of
the problem.
No joy, same issue..
now *that* is really weird. can you post your rules and queues?
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Also, I tried lower the guarantee to 256k just in case this part of the
problem.
No joy, same issue..
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaping, kil
At 02:48 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I probably don't but I do testing sometimes with multiple lines back to my
> SoftSwitch at the office and don't want to yank it down to 100k or so and
> have problems.
>
> Either way the bandwidth here is only
On 10/26/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I probably don't but I do testing sometimes with multiple lines back to my
> SoftSwitch at the office and don't want to yank it down to 100k or so and
> have problems.
>
> Either way the bandwidth here is only suppose to be reserved for the VOIP i
It guarantees that his entire line could be used for VOIP if needed.
>From my understanding of the shaper (until it was recently changed)
was that you can dedicate all the bandwidth you want and if it's not
using it other queues would borrow from it. It appears that this
behavior has changed.
O
x27;s not being used then it's allocated
back to data etc. At least this is the way I understand it..
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic S
At 02:31 PM 10/26/2005, you wrote:
Here is my setup:
WRAP
128 mb CF Card
First install 0.864 then upgraded via the web GUI to 0.892 WRAP.
Currently using WAN/LAN only, OPT1 is not doing anything.
This is a home setup using a DSL connection with PPPOE.
All is well until I turn on traffic shap
Here is my setup:
WRAP
128 mb CF Card
First install 0.864 then upgraded via the web GUI to 0.892 WRAP.
Currently using WAN/LAN only, OPT1 is not doing anything.
This is a home setup using a DSL connection with PPPOE.
All is well until I turn on traffic shaping and run the wizard, then my data
65 matches
Mail list logo
