this setup just came to mind and would be a GREAT addition to an already GREAT product !!!--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: [pfSense Support] default gateway on LAN ???From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: support@pfsense.comDate: 01-23-2006 4:21 pm
I have
David Strout wrote:
I have a ? / feature request. If pfS IS NOT the default GW on the LAN
then I suppose that the only way to direct all traffic out the
REAL/PRIMARY GW is to enter a static route for the LAN subnet to an
alternate IP address (that of the default GW for the LAN).
I believe
I have a ? / feature request. If pfS IS NOT the default GW on the LAN then I suppose that the only way to direct all traffic out the REAL/PRIMARY GW is to enter a static route for the LAN subnet to an alternate IP address (that of the default GW for the LAN). I believe you can enter a
Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] default gateway on LAN ???
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-23-2006 4:36 pm
David Strout wrote:
I have a ? / feature request. If pfS IS NOT the default GW on the LAN
then I suppose
problematic.
--Bill
On 1/23/06, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a quick visual of what I have in a coulpe of locations ...
Let me know if it comes through.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] default gateway
On 1/23/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ideally, I'd do what Bill described, since the routing is much nicer,
and the filtering capabilities are much better.
One note on that. Since we currently can't filter traffic coming in
off the IPSec tunnel, this setup would actually increase
