Thank you Scott, it solves my problem with routing.
Thanks again for your time
-Jose
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:22 AM, jose thomastk.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
In our data center, we have two pfsense 1.2.2
Interesting. I had wished I could make that scenario work w/ipsec.
Alas, no joy. I had to set up a vyatta to do it and it worked
flawlessly out of the box. I didn't need a third NIC port to do it,
either. My thinking is that BSD doesn't handle virtual interfaces very
well. *sigh* I
2009/6/30 Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com:
Interesting. I had wished I could make that scenario work w/ipsec. Alas, no
joy. I had to set up a vyatta to do it and it worked flawlessly out of the
box. I didn't need a third NIC port to do it, either. My thinking is that
BSD doesn't handle
I have configured 2 IPSEC-VPN-Tunnels between 2 Boxes for such a scenario.
Works like a charm.
michael
I had two subnets. I had machines on both subnets. The opt1 interface
could not be pinged and was generally dropping packets. If I can't
communicate locally with some sort of
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
[snip]
Unless I can get good communication going today, vyatta gets the nod at 5:00
pm.
If you are under those types of time constraints then you really
should consider our commercial support offering.
Scott
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
Interesting. I had wished I could make that scenario work w/ipsec. Alas, no
joy. I had to set up a vyatta to do it and it worked flawlessly out of the
box. I didn't need a third NIC port to do
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
It works OK in 1.2.X. It works even better in 2.0.
It really does work in 1.2.X using parallel tunnels.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
2009/6/30 Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
It works OK in 1.2.X. It works even better in 2.0.
It really does work in 1.2.X using parallel tunnels.
Scott
2009/6/30 Michael Schuh michael.sc...@gmail.com:
2009/6/30 Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
It works OK in 1.2.X. It works even better in 2.0.
It really does work in 1.2.X using parallel tunnels.
Scott
Scott Ullrich wrote:
[snip]
If you are under those types of time constraints then you really
should consider our commercial support offering.
This shouldn't be that difficult. I've been doing this configuration on
an OpenRoute GT900 for over a year. I set it up in a couple of hours.
I
[snip]
yes, exactly this way,
2 identical tunnels with different local/remote subnets...
Other settings are identical
a really impotant thing is, that the remote nets are different from
the liocal nets.
otherwise it get routing problems
Why do I need parallel tunnels when all I
2009/6/30 Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com:
[snip]
yes, exactly this way,
2 identical tunnels with different local/remote subnets...
Other settings are identical
a really impotant thing is, that the remote nets are different from
the liocal nets.
otherwise it get routing problems
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm pretty frustrated.
Even more of a reason to consider our offering. The offering is
there to help eliminate frustration and to offer the best support
possible.
Scott
[snip]
Even more of a reason to consider our offering. The offering is
there to help eliminate frustration and to offer the best support
possible.
Scott
I'm not sure $600.00 for a one time thing is worth it.
-
To
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Curtis Maurandcmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
I'm not sure $600.00 for a one time thing is worth it.
The time leftover can be used for other situations. But it appears
your mind is already made up.
Scott
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:17:39PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
[snip]
you need only 2 tunnels for passing 2 subnets from one side to the other
I'm only passing one. and this dinky little config shouldn't need paid
support to happen.
Folks, please try to quote
Curtis Maurand wrote:
[snip]
you need only 2 tunnels for passing 2 subnets from one side to the other
I'm only passing one. and this dinky little config shouldn't need paid
support to happen.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database
Hi there,
In our data center, we have two pfsense 1.2.2 boxes with two subnets behind
the NAT.
The OPT1 interfaces are been using for the inter communication between the
two lan
subnets owned by the two pfsense boxes. We have a configured openVPN for the
two
WAN interfaces.
The problem is that
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:22 AM, jose thomastk.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
In our data center, we have two pfsense 1.2.2 boxes with two subnets behind
the NAT.
The OPT1 interfaces are been using for the inter communication between the
two lan
subnets owned by the two pfsense boxes. We
19 matches
Mail list logo
