Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
Client from somewhere wants to connect to the ftp servers (more than
1) behind the pfsense..
Cihan SAĞLAMÖZ
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
mailto:evg.yu...@rogers.com>> wrote:
Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way for al
Client from somewhere wants to connect to the ftp servers (more than 1)
behind the pfsense.
Cihan
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a way for allowing passive ftp on pfsense?
>>
>>
>> I don't want to give permit all ports b
Client from somewhere wants to connect to the ftp servers (more than 1)
behind the pfsense..
Cihan SAĞLAMÖZ
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a way for allowing passive ftp on pfsense?
>>
>>
>> I don't want to give permi
Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way for allowing passive ftp on pfsense?
I don't want to give permit all ports between 1024 - 65535
Cihan
Your client behind pfSense wants to connect to public FTP-server
somewhere outside?
Or client from somewhere outside want to connect to FTP-server w
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48:43PM +0300, Cihan Saglamoz wrote:
> I used it. But problem still goes on.
>
>
> on ftp helper I checked "*Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application"
>
> is that true?
>
>
> I'm not using nat. I have public ip's on LAN interface. I have routing on
> isp's router.
I used it. But problem still goes on.
on ftp helper I checked "*Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application"
is that true?
I'm not using nat. I have public ip's on LAN interface. I have routing on
isp's router. They routed my public ip blocks to my firewalls wan interface.
Do you have any opi
I used it. But problem still goes on.
on ftp helper I checked "*Disable the userland FTP-Proxy application"
is that true?
I'm not using nat. I have public ip's on LAN interface. I have routing on
isp's router. They routed my public ip blocks to my firewalls wan interface.
Do you have any opi
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Cihan Saglamoz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way for allowing passive ftp on pfsense?
>
Use the FTP helper.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail
Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey, i have a problem with ftp.
In my work i have a two network:
1) users -> router1 -> router2 -> internet
2) users -> router2 -> internet
First:
If i try to connect in a ftp server in a internet in the setup 1 the
users can
each with employee-only FTP on virtual IP.
--Bennett
-Original Message-
From: Peter Allgeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 3:58 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Passive FTP and Virtual IPs
Am Donnerstag, den 20.07.2006, 11:10 -0500 schri
Am Donnerstag, den 20.07.2006, 11:10 -0500 schrieb Bennett:
> It's my understanding that FTP-proxy works only on the interface IP,
> not on virtual IPs. Is that correct? If so, that's horribly
> limiting, especially on the WAN. Is there no way to configure it for
> virtual IPs via a shell comman
I will do this tonight, im not rebooting my primary FW during the day, but I
guess if I had CARP setup I could :) Thats next weeks project.
Will get you a full report tonight!
Thanks again for all the help
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:16, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 6/7/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROT
On 6/7/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well your 100% right, if the IP is set to PARP it will not work, I do have two
instances of pftpx though, one with just the private IP, and then one with
private and public, and all works well now, did have to reboot after setting
the VIP's to CARP
Well your 100% right, if the IP is set to PARP it will not work, I do have two
instances of pftpx though, one with just the private IP, and then one with
private and public, and all works well now, did have to reboot after setting
the VIP's to CARP and re-adding the firewall rule, but all works
On 6/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it wont let me setup the WAN address becuase that address is being
used by choparp, I have to set my WAN IP's to use proxy ARP because of a
strange reason with my carrier. Could that be causing this entire fiasco?
Not sure but the easy wa
I think it wont let me setup the WAN address becuase that address is being
used by choparp, I have to set my WAN IP's to use proxy ARP because of a
strange reason with my carrier. Could that be causing this entire fiasco?
On Monday 05 June 2006 22:00, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Brad Bend
On 6/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ive removed and re-added the FTP NAT entry. It did say it added a entry for
FTP helper, but all I see is a firewall rule that adds all port 21 for LAN
and WAN, and I dont see any deny's in the firewall log. Any reason I cant run
this command manual
Ive removed and re-added the FTP NAT entry. It did say it added a entry for
FTP helper, but all I see is a firewall rule that adds all port 21 for LAN
and WAN, and I dont see any deny's in the firewall log. Any reason I cant run
this command manually that you would be aware of?
Thanks again for
53 PM
> > To: support@pfsense.com
> > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive FTP
> >
> >
> > I have a similar situation and have not been able to make
> > this work. I have a
> > dual wan policy based setup. Wan interface is DHCP cable
> > modem.
On 6/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now FTP helper is on WAN and LAN, and the output of ps awux | grep pftpx
shows:
/usr/local/sbin/pftpx -c 8021 -g 8021 192.168.xxx.xxx
Not even 2 IP's at all.
Also, the IP above is LAN IP of the firewall not the server that FTP is
running on
Right now FTP helper is on WAN and LAN, and the output of ps awux | grep pftpx
shows:
/usr/local/sbin/pftpx -c 8021 -g 8021 192.168.xxx.xxx
Not even 2 IP's at all.
Also, the IP above is LAN IP of the firewall not the server that FTP is
running on at all.
If I try to run it manually, I get a "C
On 6/6/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yup, Primary and only WAN. Im only trying this on one IP right now (not the IP
of the firewall itself, but a Virtual IP).
If the WAN ftp helper is running, it should look like this:
# ps awux | grep pftpx
proxy15757 0.0 0.3 656 428 ??
Yup, Primary and only WAN. Im only trying this on one IP right now (not the IP
of the firewall itself, but a Virtual IP).
On Monday 05 June 2006 21:01, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> And you are redirecting this from the primary wan right?
>
> On 6/5/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually
And you are redirecting this from the primary wan right?
On 6/5/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, upon looking at this again, the "pftpx" application is running with
arguments of -c 8021 and -g 8021 and then the LAN IP address. How does it
know what ports it supposed to use? Im
Actually, upon looking at this again, the "pftpx" application is running with
arguments of -c 8021 and -g 8021 and then the LAN IP address. How does it
know what ports it supposed to use? Im using standard 21 and then 3-35000
for the data ports, im going to do some more in depth research on
On 6/5/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FTP is just evil, I wish people would stop using it!!! Is a reboot required
when you make changes to the FTP helper? Anyway I can just force the
ftpproxy, mine is showing the LAN IP (but I havent rebooted yet).
It may just require a reboot. Give
FTP is just evil, I wish people would stop using it!!! Is a reboot required
when you make changes to the FTP helper? Anyway I can just force the
ftpproxy, mine is showing the LAN IP (but I havent rebooted yet).
Thanks
Brad
On Monday 05 June 2006 15:51, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> The bottom line is t
rt@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive FTP
>
>
> I have a similar situation and have not been able to make
> this work. I have a
> dual wan policy based setup. Wan interface is DHCP cable
> modem. OPT1 is DSL
> with static IPs. I have tried setting up
The bottom line is that it should work with the FTP helpers on. I
have invested damn near 80 hours in making FTP work in every situation
that I could. At this point I don't know what to do or say as it
works in every single install that I have access to. Really sorry
that I dont' have more inf
I have a similar situation and have not been able to make this work. I have a
dual wan policy based setup. Wan interface is DHCP cable modem. OPT1 is DSL
with static IPs. I have tried setting up a port forward for ftp from
OPT1->LAN. This have failed several ways. What are the official ste
Re enable it for the LAN and WAN.
On 6/5/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I show the pftpx process is running on my beta4 machine, yet it has my LAN IP
address. In the config.xml I have a yet i have no other
instances of this in the config file anywhere. In the web interface I h
Hello,
I show the pftpx process is running on my beta4 machine, yet it has my LAN IP
address. In the config.xml I have a yet i have no other
instances of this in the config file anywhere. In the web interface I have it
disabled in the LAN, and enabled in the WAN. I made these changes and
reboo
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 6/1/06, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should the FTP helper then run and be bound to the WAN-interface?
I can see all the other FTP-helpers bound on most other interfaces, but
I can't see it being bound to the WAN.
(This on a late post-beta2-snapshot)
Why a
On 6/1/06, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should the FTP helper then run and be bound to the WAN-interface?
I can see all the other FTP-helpers bound on most other interfaces, but
I can't see it being bound to the WAN.
(This on a late post-beta2-snapshot)
Why are you asking about be
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Enable the FTP helper on Interfaces -> WAN. Reboot.
Should the FTP helper then run and be bound to the WAN-interface?
I can see all the other FTP-helpers bound on most other interfaces, but
I can't see it being bound to the WAN.
(This on a late post-beta2-snapshot)
Enable the FTP helper on Interfaces -> WAN. Reboot.
On 6/1/06, Bernhard Ledermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using an ftp-server behind pfsense (beta4) with NAT. I have problems
with ftp-clients in passive mode witch are also behind a firewall with NAT
to browse the ftp-directory.
I k
On Jun 1, 2006, at 13:37 , Bernhard Ledermann wrote:
I am using an ftp-server behind pfsense (beta4) with NAT. I have
problems with ftp-clients in passive mode witch are also behind a
firewall with NAT to browse the ftp-directory.
I know there were few discussions about this, but is there a
OK so now on my 3rd attempt with fresh installs, it's still not working,
and again I have rules that are logging a pass, and I have no rules set
to log passes, only the default block. There's some bug here but damned
if I could say for sure whats triggering it.
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 14:58 -0700,
Hmm. reaset rules set to default
Added on WAN:
rules to https to Outlook Web Access (OWA) box
rules for access to Nortel VPN device in the DMZ.
rule to route traffic from mail relay host in dmz to internal
rulle to allow ftp (21) to machine in DMZ
Added on OPT1 (DMZ):
Ports to allow communicat
I reverted to a ruleset from yesterday; whatever is causing the issue i'm
having is really odd. i've taken my failover box and am going to rebuild
from scratch
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
cvs_synch.sh again and see if they go away.
On 4/30/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECT
cvs_synch.sh again and see if they go away.
On 4/30/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just got back home and was taking a quick look at things before bed,
and for some reason I'm getting an error loading the rule set
exactly -f /tmp/rules.debug
/tmp/rules.debug:95: macro 'op
I just got back home and was taking a quick look at things before bed,
and for some reason I'm getting an error loading the rule set
exactly -f /tmp/rules.debug
/tmp/rules.debug:95: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rules.debug:95: syntax error
/tmp/rules.debug:96: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rul
I just got back home and was taking a quick look at things before bed,
and for some reason I'm getting an error loading the rule set
exactly -f /tmp/rules.debug
/tmp/rules.debug:95: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rules.debug:95: syntax error
/tmp/rules.debug:96: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rul
All that is required is to allow the traffic on port TCP/21.
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok i've now spun myself to a point of being confused..
can i get a brief discussion of what i need to get ftp working; what
changes to the lan and dmz do i need to make?
i've
ok i've now spun myself to a point of being confused..
can i get a brief discussion of what i need to get ftp working; what
changes to the lan and dmz do i need to make?
i've ben playing with this too much that i've lost where i'm going with this
---
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
should the ftp helper be handling this block?
DMZ 10.0.0.10:20x.x.x.x:55628 TCP
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
should the ftp helper be handling this block?
DMZ 10.0.0.10:20x.x.x.x:55628 TCP
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
>
> No, the FTP helper automatically installs rules.
OK thats what I thou
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
>
> No, the FTP helper automatically installs rules.
OK thats what I thought.. I'm seeing this
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
No, the FTP helper automatically installs rules.
OK thats what I thought.. I'm seeing this being blocked:
WAN x.x.x.x:52336 10.0.0.10:54473
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
No, the FTP helper automatically installs rules.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Both pfSense boxes are using 4-08-2006 snapshot. I'll give the sync
command a try.
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 3:21 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Passive FTP - sorry
This was
This was fixed a few days ago. cvs_sync.sh releng_1 or update to the
latest snapshot.
On 4/11/06, Jason J Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry... But I seem to be brain dead...
>
> Co-location server (Downtown):
> I have an FTP server behind a 1:1 NAT on the OPT1 interface and FTP Proxy
>
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:39 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> It may look okay, but does it work? :)
appears to be, it was only effecting my outbound passive ftp from the
dmz, not to big of concern at the moment... I'll check more later.
thanks
-
It may look okay, but does it work? :)
On 3/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I guess I misread it, it all looks good now.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Sorry I guess I misread it, it all looks good now.
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:01 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> The pass rule for 8021 is further up. Why is this not correct?
>
> On 3/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's still not coming up quite right I believe:
> >
> > l
The pass rule for 8021 is further up. Why is this not correct?
On 3/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's still not coming up quite right I believe:
>
> lan = "{ bge0 }"
> wan = "{ xl0 carp0 ng0 }"
> DMZ = "{ em0 }"
> SYNC = "{ em1 }"
>
> rdr on $lan proto tcp from any to
It's still not coming up quite right I believe:
lan = "{ bge0 }"
wan = "{ xl0 carp0 ng0 }"
DMZ = "{ em0 }"
SYNC = "{ em1 }"
rdr on $lan proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021
rdr on $DMZ proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8022
# enable ftp-proxy
pass in quick
If you are running on a full install, please issue:
cvs_sync.sh releng_1 && /etc/rc.filter_configure
And see if the problem is fixed.
Thanks!
On 3/25/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, that'll do it. I'll get that fixed up in a sec.
>
> On 3/25/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAI
Yep, that'll do it. I'll get that fixed up in a sec.
On 3/25/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this helps, in the rules.debug I see:
>
> # FTP Proxy/helper
> rdr on $lan proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021
> rdr on $DMZ proto tcp from any to
I'm not sure if this helps, in the rules.debug I see:
# FTP Proxy/helper
rdr on $lan proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021
rdr on $DMZ proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8022
and below that a little ways:
# enable ftp-proxy
pass in quick on em0 inet proto tcp
I fixed some FTP helper issues on inbound from WAN->LAN[DMZ], etc.
Try cvs_sync.sh releng_1 and see if it helps. Otherwise after bootup
you have to run /etc/rc.filter_configure a second time for it to
install the helper correctly.
On 3/25/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don
I don't think thats it, I have that rule on my LAN and the DMZ
interfaces, but it's not working. It now appears that as well inbound
FTP is not working at all.
more info in a bit, spam assassin has just died on me
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:50 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Maybe this will help?
>
Maybe this will help?
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=103&artlang=en&highlight=ftp
On 3/25/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have outbound passive FTP working for machines in the DMZ, what
> the heck am I missing?
>
> I see the default block ru
Great! Glad its solved.
Scott
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So daily I use the term PEBKAC when referring to some of the silly
> problems I tend to see people come to me with on a day to day basis.
> Well this problem turns out is my own PEBKAC. There was an old ent
So daily I use the term PEBKAC when referring to some of the silly
problems I tend to see people come to me with on a day to day basis.
Well this problem turns out is my own PEBKAC. There was an old entry for
a PROXY ARP that was causing the problem, all is good now.
Thanks Scott for your help, as
ya I knew that, sorry I wasn't sure where else that was listed, I keep
forgetting about the default page:
TESTING-SNAPSHOT-02-20-06
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:29 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Ignore auto update, its not working. You need to check the firmware
> version on the main status page.
>
Ignore auto update, its not working. You need to check the firmware
version on the main status page.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The firmware autoupdate shows me running
> 1.0b2rc5
>
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:24 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > Sounds like the bug w
The firmware autoupdate shows me running
1.0b2rc5
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:24 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Sounds like the bug we fixed after beta1, honestly...
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > currently:
> >
> > x.x.x.89 is the WAN interface
> > x.x.x.68 is the
On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
Like I said, works fine on the LAN interface, not the DMZ interface.
Perhaps there's something else in the pfsense config i'm missing.
do I have to set a 1:1 NAT for the machines in my non-routable DMZ?
with snapshot 02-20-06 I have found
Sounds like the bug we fixed after beta1, honestly...
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> currently:
>
> x.x.x.89 is the WAN interface
> x.x.x.68 is the IP binat'd to 10.1.1.150 in the DMZ
>
>
> If I disable binat to the DMZ machine, outbound passive FTP will work,
> but the
currently:
x.x.x.89 is the WAN interface
x.x.x.68 is the IP binat'd to 10.1.1.150 in the DMZ
If I disable binat to the DMZ machine, outbound passive FTP will work,
but then the machine is not accessible via x.x.x.68
does that help?
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:13 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Sho
Shouldnt need to do any of this, no. I'll try to make some time to
bring up a box and test this but my next 4 days are going to be tough
to find extra time.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:02 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > Looks fine to me. N
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:02 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Looks fine to me. Not really sure what is going on as FTP works fine here.
Like I said, works fine on the LAN interface, not the DMZ interface.
Perhaps there's something else in the pfsense config i'm missing.
do I have to set a 1:1 NAT f
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:12 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> FTP is handled by rules behind the scene. The rules you are showing
> us mean nothing to it.
Sorry this might be a bit ugly sending everything, but here goes:
scrub on xl0 all fragment reassemble
anchor "ftpsesame/*" all
anchor "firewall
Looks fine to me. Not really sure what is going on as FTP works fine here.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:12 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > FTP is handled by rules behind the scene. The rules you are showing
> > us mean nothing to it.
>
> Sor
FTP is handled by rules behind the scene. The rules you are showing
us mean nothing to it.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. I'm still having the passive FTP issue. It's quite possibly
> something in my rules, does anything look borked?
>
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:0
Hmm. I'm still having the passive FTP issue. It's quite possibly
something in my rules, does anything look borked?
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:02 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Yep, thats it.
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Scott,
> >
> > Should I be grabbing
Yep, thats it.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Scott,
>
> Should I be grabbing
>
> http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-19-06/
>
> for that?
>
> Sorry I'm not quite if this is the latest or if there's some other
> method to get it
>
> On Thu,
Thanks Scott,
Should I be grabbing
http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-19-06/
for that?
Sorry I'm not quite if this is the latest or if there's some other
method to get it
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:44 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Fixed in latest testing snapshot. Please u
Fixed in latest testing snapshot. Please update.
On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to set up the following:
>
>/ <-> CARP
> WAN int (PFSENSE BOX)<-> LAN
>\<-> DMZ
>
> I want to have nat on the LAN, bi-nat on the DMZ, filtering incoming an
son J Ellingson
615.301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis
www.ellingson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: jonathan gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:18 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive ftp (strike 2)
Scott,
y, October 24, 2005 4:18 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive ftp (strike 2)
Scott,
i put a rule as you told me but this doesn't seems to work. The only way
to enable ftp (active) is de-activating the ftp-helper.
This is a snippet of the ftp window in my wor
Scott,
i put a rule as you told me but this doesn't seems to work. The only way
to enable ftp (active) is de-activating the ftp-helper.
This is a snippet of the ftp window in my workstation:
220-Local time is now 23:05. Server port: 21.
220-This is a private system - No anonymous login
220 Y
Do you have a rule permitting traffic from the WAN interface to
127.0.0.1? If not, try this.
On 10/24/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> 0.89.2
> built on Sat Oct 22 22:16:29 UTC 2005
>
>
> jonathan
>
>
>
> Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > What version?
> >
> > On 10/24/05, jo
Scott,
0.89.2
built on Sat Oct 22 22:16:29 UTC 2005
jonathan
Scott Ullrich wrote:
What version?
On 10/24/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi group,
i keep on having trouble while access my ftp server on one of my lan's
from internet.
Active ftp works fine, but, even if
What version?
On 10/24/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> i keep on having trouble while access my ftp server on one of my lan's
> from internet.
>
> Active ftp works fine, but, even if we have discussed this in the past
> and a ticket in the cvs were opened to solve
At 05:04 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
File a ticket on cvstrac and I will change the behavior to start the
ftp helper using:
/usr/local/sbin/pftpx -b $inet-address -c 21 -f 10.0.0.2 -g 21
Roger. Thx!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
File a ticket on cvstrac and I will change the behavior to start the
ftp helper using:
/usr/local/sbin/pftpx -b $inet-address -c 21 -f 10.0.0.2 -g 21
Scott
On 10/10/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:38 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
> >Well I'm not sure to tell you the truth.
At 04:38 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
Well I'm not sure to tell you the truth. I wonder if binding it to the
inet facing ip would fix it. The only this is this would remove the need
for nat as you would have the proxy handle all the hand offs. :/
Try this. Kill pftpx (only the one with the -c 21 -f
onday, October 10, 2005 3:29 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] passive ftp
At 12:44 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
>This is what the man page says for the -f switch.
>
> -f address
> Fixed server address. The proxy will always connect to
the
>same
At 12:44 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
This is what the man page says for the -f switch.
-f address
Fixed server address. The proxy will always connect to the
same
server, regardless of where the client wanted to connect to
(before it was redirected). Use this
At 12:44 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
This is what the man page says for the -f switch.
-f address
Fixed server address. The proxy will always connect to the
same
server, regardless of where the client wanted to connect to
(before it was redirected). Use this
AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] passive ftp
At 11:46 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
>Oh sorry I didn't read this very well. I'm guessing the problem has to
>do with the ftp proxy (pftpx) saying the data channel is on 10.0.0.2.
>
>227 Entering Passive Mode (1
Hi,
Yes, my comment was internal connections to external servers.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive ftp
Hi Dave [hi all],
when i said passive ft
At 11:46 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
Oh sorry I didn't read this very well. I'm guessing the problem has to
do with the ftp proxy (pftpx) saying the data channel is on 10.0.0.2.
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,0,0,2,191,87) <- 10,0,0,2
ah, yeah, i didn't notice that either. not enough coffee, i g
At 11:41 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
No route to host seems a little odd. Where did you start the ftp from
and where was it going to (lan -> dmz)?
i ssh'ed to a linux server outside (wan). this was from wan => lan
(via a tunnel).
---
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:24 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive ftp
At 11:13 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
>As of 0.86.4 there should be a automatic ftp helper that is launched
>for internet -> lan ftp redirections. Make sure you're on the latest
>ver
No route to host seems a little odd. Where did you start the ftp from
and where was it going to (lan -> dmz)?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Swartzendruber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:24 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] passive
At 11:13 AM 10/10/2005, you wrote:
As of 0.86.4 there should be a automatic ftp helper that is launched
for internet -> lan ftp redirections. Make sure you're on the latest
version.
Hmmm, I'm on 0.86.4 now, and it doesn't work for me. I went to an
external linux server and ftp'ed back in to
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
