Re: Inbox.msf

David L. Ross wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Terry R. wrote: The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 3:36:19 PM, and on a whim, Bill Spikowski pounded out on the keyboard: My "Inbox.msf" file is about 3KB but my "Inbox" file is over 1 GB. I keep NO messages in the inbox; whatever comes in gets f

Spam in e-mails...?

Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? Maybe, or something on your ISP's end. Its not SM. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: SM2 does not offer to remember passwords

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: Margo Guda wrote: I recently changed the password on one site which was on my managed passwords list. So I used the password manager to delete that entry, as it would pop up with the old password filled out. However I

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

On 31.03.2009 04:47, Cedar wrote: --- Original Message --- Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? Contact your ISP, they may be using SpamAssassin to flag ***SPAM*** in the subject li

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? If this is something like [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 03.8/3.0], this is probably the antispam filter of your ISP or email provider. This fe

Re: Inbox.msf

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: My "Inbox.msf" file is about 3KB but my "Inbox" file is over 1 GB. I keep NO messages in the inbox; whatever comes in gets filtered to other folders. What's in the 1GB file? I have a similar sit

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? it can be one of several things. First, check with your email provider. If no, then check with your anti virus, and your firewall.

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

On 31.03.2009 09:01, John Doue wrote: --- Original Message --- Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? If this is something like [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 03.8/3.0], this is

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.03.2009 09:01, John Doue wrote: --- Original Message --- Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? If this is something like [***SPAM*** Score/Req:

Re: Inbox.msf

The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:42:11 AM, and on a whim, Bill Spikowski pounded out on the keyboard: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bill Spikowski wrote: My "Inbox.msf" file is about 3KB but my "Inbox" file is over 1 GB. I keep NO

Re: Seamonkey 1.1.15 can't find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 in Debian 5.0

On 03/30/2009 05:00 PM, Bob Barrett wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 03/30/2009 11:34 AM, Bob Barrett wrote: >> >>> I have installed seamonkey-1.1.15.en-US.linux-i686.tar.gz in >>> /usr/local/seamonkey/ on a new installation of Debian 5.0. Trying the >>> first start as root, I get this error: >>> >>>

Re: 1.1.15 upgrade corrupts settings

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Marisa Ciceran wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: I'm presuming thats Netscape 4.x. If so, then you need to reinstall that, and use their profile manager to remove that profile. Peter, Yes, Netscape 4.x. I hadn't thought of that "fix", but

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

On 31.03.2009 10:35, John Doue wrote: --- Original Message --- Jay Garcia wrote: On 31.03.2009 09:01, John Doue wrote: --- Original Message --- Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antiviru

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line that starts "Me". When I go into the sent folder and do a view -> message

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I > >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line > >>> that star

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: > googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > > On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I > >>> composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line > >>> that star

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time, if I send i

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Ok - here's an example of the problem, based o

Re: Seamonkey 1.1.15 can't find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 in Debian 5.0

NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 05:00 PM, Bob Barrett wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 11:34 AM, Bob Barrett wrote: I have installed seamonkey-1.1.15.en-US.linux-i686.tar.gz in /usr/local/seamonkey/ on a new installation of Debian 5.0. Trying the first start as root, I get this error: ./seamon

Re: [2.0a2] Cannot save address

P.N. wrote: Hello! I've got this annoying problem: Want to add an address for a mailing list, but as it is only a list's address, there's no first name and last name, so I'm entering only display name and email address. When clicking OK, the address is dropped without any warning :-( So, p

Re: [2.0a2] Cannot save address

Daniel wrote: Peter, on odd occasions, I receive an email from someone that is not in my address book, and I need to reply! If I just click "Reply", add my reply, and hit send, when I next check my address book, that address will appear with the email address entered as both the email addres

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Cedar wrote: Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new version of sm doing this? or would it more likely be avg antivirus or something? Cedar, when you say "Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam]", what do you mean?? The others have told you that your ISP

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: > The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, > googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: > > > > > On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net > > wrote: > >> googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: > >>> On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net > >>> wrote: >

Re: [2.0a2] Cannot save address

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Daniel wrote: Peter, on odd occasions, I receive an email from someone that is not in my address book, and I need to reply! If I just click "Reply", add my reply, and hit send, when I next check my address book, that address will appear with the email addr

Re: Spam in e-mails...?

Daniel wrote: If it says "Scam", I don't know that you can train SM to do anything, except to let you know which messages it thinks are sus... no you can't, but you can turn it off. -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This

Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0

The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, "Terry R." wrote: The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim, googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard: On Mar 31

The times...they are a'changing (was: Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0)

Leonidas Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert i

Re: [2.0a2] Cannot save address

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Daniel wrote: Peter, on odd occasions, I receive an email from someone that is not in my address book, and I need to reply! If I just click "Reply", add my reply, and hit send, when I next check my address book, that address will appear with the email ad

Re: The times...they are a'changing

Daniel wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote: googl...@kwcpa.com wrote: Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50 or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems sending in plain text. SM do

Re: [2.0a2] Cannot save address

Daniel wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Daniel wrote: Peter, on odd occasions, I receive an email from someone that is not in my address book, and I need to reply! If I just click "Reply", add my reply, and hit send, when I next check my address book, that address will appear with

Re: The times...they are a'changing

In , Leonidas Jones wrote: > Daniel wrote: > > Lee, I know MS wanted to re-set my clock over the week end, > > thinking we have finished Daylight Savings, but we didn't, so I had > > to re-adjust my clock! > > > > This may explain how you manage

Re: The times...they are a'changing

When daylight savings changed, on 1/2 my PCs I had to remove and re- install the latest DST patch to get things to work. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 1.1.15 can't find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 in Debian 5.0

On 03/31/2009 05:17 PM, Daniel wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> I'll have to install into /usr/local/ on a test machine. All of my >> installs are installed to /home//Seamonkey or Seamonkey2. >> >> Can I ask why you wish to run as root? That is generally *not* >> recommended for any browser/suite. >> >>

Re: Seamonkey 1.1.15 can't find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 in Debian 5.0

NoOp wrote: On 03/31/2009 05:17 PM, Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: I'll have to install into /usr/local/ on a test machine. All of my installs are installed to /home//Seamonkey or Seamonkey2. Can I ask why you wish to run as root? That is generally *not* recommended for any browser/sui

Re: Seamonkey 1.1.15 can't find libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 in Debian 5.0

NoOp wrote: On 03/31/2009 05:17 PM, Daniel wrote: NoOp wrote: I'll have to install into /usr/local/ on a test machine. All of my installs are installed to /home//Seamonkey or Seamonkey2. Can I ask why you wish to run as root? That is generally *not* recommended for any browser/sui