Klaus wrote:
> It often happens to me that I receive emails (e.g. from the web interface
> of GMX) that carry .DOC, .JPG, .PDF or other attachments but just use
> "Content-Type: application/octet-stream" for any attachment, regardless
> of the actual file type.
Sorry, I meant web.de, not GMX.
Kl
On Aug 31, 4:37 pm, Mark Hansen wrote:
> Ken,
>
> If you're building the web site with a tool like Microsoft VS.NET,
> are you sure it is not doing any sniffing?
>
> To be sure, try changing the user agent string sent by SeaMonkey
> to that normally sent by Firefox and see what happens. If the
My wife corresponds with her sister using SeaMonkey. The original
exchange is in black print. The second person will select a color (lets
say blue) for their interspersed comments to the original message. Then
the first person will select a color (lets say red) for interspersing
comment
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jim P wrote:
Jim P wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 08/29/2010 09:52 PM, Jim P wrote:
I have a Dell 4600, Win XP with all the updates, SM2.06. Last week I
suddenly can not send attachments over about 100 K. Smaller files are
sent fine. It doesn't matter the file type. Regular e-mail wor
On 31.08.2010 20:47, W3BNR wrote:
--- Original Message ---
> After much thought Jay Garcia wrote:
>> On 31.08.2010 19:12, W3BNR wrote:
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>>
>>> Somehow my FILE/PAGE SETUP/MARGINS& HEADER/FOOTER margin measurements
>>> got set to millimeters. How do I set them bac
On 31.08.2010 20:47, W3BNR wrote:
--- Original Message ---
> After much thought Jay Garcia wrote:
>> On 31.08.2010 19:12, W3BNR wrote:
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>>
>>> Somehow my FILE/PAGE SETUP/MARGINS& HEADER/FOOTER margin measurements
>>> got set to millimeters. How do I set them bac
Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/31/2010 9:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/31/10 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ros
Rickles wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rickles wrote:
WinXP Pro, SP3 with Security and Critical updates. SM 1.1.19 with
Mulitzilla and IETab.
If you go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/, near the bottom is a highlight
area called 'Special Reports'. In my SM display, that Special Reports
heading,
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/31/10 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I have the PrefBar extension i
After much thought Jay Garcia wrote:
On 31.08.2010 19:12, W3BNR wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Somehow my FILE/PAGE SETUP/MARGINS& HEADER/FOOTER margin measurements
got set to millimeters. How do I set them back to inches? "Help" file
is of no help.
Check your printer setup to see if
On 31.08.2010 19:12, W3BNR wrote:
--- Original Message ---
> Somehow my FILE/PAGE SETUP/MARGINS & HEADER/FOOTER margin measurements
> got set to millimeters. How do I set them back to inches? "Help" file
> is of no help.
>
Check your printer setup to see if you're set to metric.
--
*Jay Ga
Somehow my FILE/PAGE SETUP/MARGINS & HEADER/FOOTER margin measurements
got set to millimeters. How do I set them back to inches? "Help" file
is of no help.
--
Ed
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu/
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Mandatory retirement is another form o
On 8/31/2010 10:54 AM, Ken wrote:
> On Aug 31, 9:45 am, "David E. Ross" wrote:
>> Is your server sniffing for "Firefox"? It should instead sniff for
>> "Gecko".
>>
>> However, if you make your site compliant with the W3C specifications, it
>> is likely that you do not have to sniff at all.
>>
>>
Ray wrote:
> I can't see a significant difference between these file names (both
> contain spaces and a mix of letters & numerals) and I can't understand
> why SM treats them differently.
Hi Ray,
When you look at the email source (Control-U), do both attachments have
the same MIME type?
It often
On 8/31/10 1:37 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
> On 8/31/2010 9:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 8/31/10 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
>>> Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
> On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
>> On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>>> On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, An
On 8/31/10 10:54 AM, Ken wrote:
> On Aug 31, 9:45 am, "David E. Ross" wrote:
>> Is your server sniffing for "Firefox"? It should instead sniff for
>> "Gecko".
>>
>> However, if you make your site compliant with the W3C specifications, it
>> is likely that you do not have to sniff at all.
>>
>> Fo
On 8/31/2010 9:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/31/10 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I have t
Daniel wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
But beware, even that can be turned
down if the SM reviewers don't want it.
Hey, Jens, I know the team that produces SeaMonkey is undermanned, but
does that mean that someone that has nothing to do with the SeaMonkey
Council rules on modifications, etc??
Well
Rickles wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rickles wrote:
WinXP Pro, SP3 with Security and Critical updates. SM 1.1.19 with
Mulitzilla and IETab.
If you go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/, near the bottom is a highlight
area called 'Special Reports'. In my SM display, that Special Reports
heading,
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rickles wrote:
WinXP Pro, SP3 with Security and Critical updates. SM 1.1.19 with
Mulitzilla and IETab.
If you go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/, near the bottom is a highlight
area called 'Special Reports'. In my SM display, that Special Reports
heading, photo and accom
On Aug 31, 9:45 am, "David E. Ross" wrote:
> Is your server sniffing for "Firefox"? It should instead sniff for
> "Gecko".
>
> However, if you make your site compliant with the W3C specifications, it
> is likely that you do not have to sniff at all.
>
> For an explanation of sniffing, see my
>
On 8/31/10 9:03 AM, Ken wrote:
> We're trying to upgrade a site to run on the 4.0 framework and are
> running into an issue in SeaMonkey. For some reason, it looks like the
> asp.net ajax elements are not getting added to the page. It's working
> fine in almost every other browser (FireFox, IE, Chr
We're trying to upgrade a site to run on the 4.0 framework and are
running into an issue in SeaMonkey. For some reason, it looks like the
asp.net ajax elements are not getting added to the page. It's working
fine in almost every other browser (FireFox, IE, Chrome, Opera, and
Safari) but in SM. Has
Phillip Jones wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
...
...and, as far as I can see, there is nothing on the seamonkey.org site
pointing to any method for reporting bugs.
I did attempt to post mozilla bug issues years ago and found that it was
a frustrating and maddening process.
...
Beverly Howard
On 8/31/10 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
> Ed Mullen wrote:
>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>> On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
>> On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
>>>
>>> I have the PrefBar
Daniel wrote:
frissell wrote:
...the send page
feature ...
Why send the page at all??? Why not just send the link??
Ever thought of ... because maybe you want to make sure you have captured
the information in the e-mail message (perhaps one to yourself), in case
the page changes?
O.K., I
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Just upgraded from v. 1.1.16 to 2.0.6, and it seemed to go smoothly --
most everything was seamlessly imported, even down to my global Windows
shortcut that launches the program.
After poking around the program and reading the release notes, I have
two que
On 8/31/2010 5:41 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Only item I woul love to permanent kill is the NetFlix ad opens every
time you open another website. I believe they have infiltrated the
various sites without knowledge of the website owner. For example cNet,
ZDnet, and Computerworld news. as long as yo
DoctorBill wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I blew out my SM 1.1 (Previous Thread) and now my old E-Mail account
shows up.
This all started when I tried to edit out some OLD SMTP settings in
Mail & Newsgroup Settings.
My question is - how can I get rid of these old SMTP and ISP settings?
If I set up
DoctorBill wrote:
After completely bombing SM 1.1 by messing with the prefs.js file,
I have recovered most of SeaMonkey and the mail.
However, the mail directory has 5 mail.xxx-#.ext's
Either mail.xxx-#.com or mail.xxx-#.net.
Some appear to be empty others are large.
My mail Inbox is empty.
H
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
But beware, even that can be turned
down if the SM reviewers don't want it.
Greetings,
Jens
Hey, Jens, I know the team that produces SeaMonkey is undermanned, but
does that mean that someone that has nothing to do with
Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I have the PrefBar extension installed for SeaMonkey. I use the
JavaScript checkbox to disabl
On 8/30/2010 9:29 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:54 PM, Ron Hunter wrote:
On 8/30/2010 12:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/30/10 7:35 AM, Ant wrote:
On 8/29/2010 3:54 PM PT, David E. Ross typed:
I have the PrefBar extension installed for SeaMonkey. I use the
JavaScript checkbox to di
33 matches
Mail list logo