Re: SOLVED! SM email not properly responding to FF mailto links

Daniel F. wrote: Hey y'all, I'm the maintainer of the ubuntuzilla repository. Here are my thoughts/ comments on the matter. Just a thought. I have no idea what you're talking about because you have deleted/snipped EVERYTHING to what your are replying. So, now I have to go re-read previous

Re: SeaMonkey Faulty Page Rendering

Daniel wrote: James Greenidge wrote: Such a situation -- works with Firefox but not with SeaMonkey -- generally indicates that the Web server is doing invalid sniffing. For an explanation of sniffing and how to defeat it, see my . -- David E. Ross I

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote : > Jane_Galt wrote: >> Lemuel Johnson wrote : >> >>> Jane_Galt wrote: >>> > The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't > recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main > page (Jane didn't specify any specific page

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

JeffM wrote : >>JeffM wrote : >>>Finding a service that isn't run by bozos would be a good plan. >>> > Jane_Galt wrote: >>Webshots is it, pretty much, for HD color photo downloading. >> > That pretty much sucks. > Some competition in that segment would be good. > I wonder why there isn't any. W

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

NoOp wrote : > > I doubt it is a sniffing issue: > http://www.webshots.com/pro/ > works for me with: > Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) > Gecko/20101125 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.11 > > Now I wonder if Webshots got the wo

Re: SOLVED! SM email not properly responding to FF mailto links

Hey y'all, I'm the maintainer of the ubuntuzilla repository. Here are my thoughts/ comments on the matter. (By the way, NoOp, it has been quite a while since ubuntuzilla was an autodownloader script. It is now an apt repository with .deb repacks of official mozilla binary builds.) So, speaking a

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

"David E. Ross" wrote : > On 11/25/10 5:29 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: >> chicagofan wrote : >> >>> Jane_Galt wrote: chicagofan wrote : > Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them > about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I > d

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

On 11/25/10 5:30 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: > "David E. Ross" wrote : > >> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: >>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : >>> WLS wrote: > Jane_Galt wrote: >> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? No. >> I cant even get it to work any

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

On 11/25/10 5:29 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: > chicagofan wrote : > >> Jane_Galt wrote: >>> chicagofan wrote : Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I don't know if that was because I swit

Re: Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.11 candidates - help wanted!

On 11/25/2010 10:18 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/25/2010 07:13 PM, NoOp wrote: On 11/24/2010 01:16 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Hi everyone, All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.11 have been created (updates are I reckon you'd be better served by putting this in a new thread with the above subject r

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Jane_Galt wrote: Lemuel Johnson wrote : Jane_Galt wrote: The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page (Jane didn't specify any specific page) http://www.webshots.com/pro/ Is there something I can

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

>Jane_Galt wrote: >>Is anyone else getting a parsing error at this site?: >>http://www.memory4less.com/ >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >New problem, eh? I see the same error in several browsers. > The only thing surprising here is that someone is surprised: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=htt

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

is a very brief definition of spoofing at > <http://www.rossde.com/internet/intr_gloss.html#spoof>.) > > Download and install PrefBar from > <https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/67148/>. Use it to > spoof Firefox, but only when tryin

Re: Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.11 candidates - help wanted!

rg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 Try this one instead: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.11 or it's Windows version.

Re: Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.11 candidates - help wanted!

On 11/24/2010 01:16 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > Hi everyone, > > All the builds for SeaMonkey 2.0.11 have been created (updates are I reckon you'd be better served by putting this in a new thread with the above subject rather than under: Testing SeaMonkey 2.0.9 candidates - help wanted! Se

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

>JeffM wrote : >>Finding a service that isn't run by bozos would be a good plan. >> Jane_Galt wrote: >Webshots is it, pretty much, for HD color photo downloading. > That pretty much sucks. Some competition in that segment would be good. I wonder why there isn't any. ...and Seamonkey is an old Nets

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Jane_Galt wrote: > Is anyone else getting a parsing error at this site?: > http://www.memory4less.com/ New problem, eh? I see the same error in several browsers. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonk

Re: Here we go again...crash...crash...crash...SM 2.0.10 Mac

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:21:11 -0600, Rufus wrote: >>> With the summary something like: >>> crash [...@ns_getbrightness(unsigned char, unsigned char, unsigned char)] >>> >>> Phil >>> >> >> WILCO - at least it looks like you were able to find something I never >> would have. I'll let you know the bug

Re: Here we go again...crash...crash...crash...SM 2.0.10 Mac

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:26:54 -0600, Rufus wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >>> Report ID Date Submitted >>> bp-5cd20ffa-5772-4b9a-bc48-533c22101124 11/24/102:29 PM >>> bp-ec60a3af-1376-45af-ba7d-916612101124 11/24/102:29 PM >>> bp-25694e

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

JeffM wrote : >>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote : >>>looks for "Internet Explorer", >>>"Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Netscape" (!), "Opera", but not >>>"SeaMonkey". (Yet another example of author bungle.) >>> >:David E. Ross wrote: >:another example of why sniffing is generally bad. >: > Jane_G

Re: SeaMonkey Faulty Page Rendering

James Greenidge wrote: Such a situation -- works with Firefox but not with SeaMonkey -- generally indicates that the Web server is doing invalid sniffing. For an explanation of sniffing and how to defeat it, see my . -- David E. Ross I much appreciat

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Lemuel Johnson wrote : > Jane_Galt wrote: > >>> >>> The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't >>> recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page >>> (Jane didn't specify any specific page) >> >> http://www.webshots.com/pro/ >> >> >> Is there somet

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Phillip Jones wrote : > your screen shot indicates the video is loading from your first > description I thought you had a problem with the system. It's not a video, those two spinning things are supposed to be pictures I can DL. Try in Internet Explorer and see. > You could use the extensio

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

"David E. Ross" wrote : > On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: >> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : >> >>> WLS wrote: >>> Jane_Galt wrote: > Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? >>> >>> No. >>> > I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. > Yet FF

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

chicagofan wrote : > Jane_Galt wrote: >> chicagofan wrote : >>> Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them >>> about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I >>> don't know if that was because I switched from SM 2.09 to SM 2.10 >>> during that pe

Re: SM 2.0.10 crash

On 10-11-25 9:13 AM, Ray_Net wrote: I was composing a mail and suddently hop a crash ! bp-8ee1cb47-0e72-45c3-a70e-898c02101124 24/11/2010 10:52 The other previous crashes was with a older SM release than the 2.0.10 bp-3ba00bd6-775f-424f-8a47-c07262100906 06/09/2010 16:38 bp-92e89d65-f574-48a7-80

Re: SM 2.0.10 Mac - crashing...and crashing...and crashing...

On 10-11-25 12:16 PM, Rufus wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: If you have the same problem in more than one profile, then the cause is probably system-wide (unless you installed the same add-ons in your new profile). One thing that is system-wide is plugins. Go to Help-->About_Plugins. From the resulti

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

>Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote : >>looks for "Internet Explorer", >>"Firefox", "Safari", "Chrome", "Netscape" (!), "Opera", but not >>"SeaMonkey". (Yet another example of author bungle.) >> :David E. Ross wrote: :another example of why sniffing is generally bad. : Jane_Galt wrote: >kept me from us

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Jane_Galt wrote: The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't recognize any but 'common' browsers. The JavaScript on their main page (Jane didn't specify any specific page) http://www.webshots.com/pro/ Is there something I can do from here? Webshots wont even reply to m

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

On 11/25/10 1:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: >>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : >>> WLS wrote: > Jane_Galt wrote: >> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? No. >> I cant even get it to work anymore

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

David E. Ross wrote: On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : WLS wrote: Jane_Galt wrote: Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? No. I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. Works fi

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

on. Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre Ok. Maybe Jane will reply with the version of SeaMonkey she is using ... Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them about the problem. In a w

Re: Query about request for new features

Le 25 novembre 2010, Bret Busby a écrit : On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lucas Levrel wrote: Are you using Debian stable? Yes. My original post in the thread, included that I am runing Debian 5, which is Debian "stable", or, Debian "lenny". OK, I'm not a Debian follower, so I just knew the non-cryp

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

On 11/25/10 12:10 PM, Jane_Galt wrote: > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : > >> WLS wrote: >> >>> Jane_Galt wrote: Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? >> >> No. >> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. >>>

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Jane_Galt wrote: chicagofan wrote : Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them about the problem. In a week it was working again. Unfortunately, I don't know if that was because I switched from SM 2.09 to SM 2.10 during that period, or because they changed something

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

ere in the SM 2.1 build configuration. >> >> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) >> Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre > > Ok. Maybe Jane will reply with the version of SeaMonkey she is using ... > The latest. 2.0.10 -

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

"David E. Ross" wrote : > > However, the "pre" strings sometimes cause problems with servers > sniffing for the Palm Pre smartphone, another example of why sniffing is > generally bad. > I dont know the tech details of all this, but I wish I could make them sniff something behind me, at th

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

ou done this? >>>> >>> It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration. >>> >>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) >>> Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre >>> >> Ok.

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

oned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent >> string might help. WLS, have you done this? >> > > It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration. > > Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) > Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote : > WLS wrote: > >> Jane_Galt wrote: >>> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? > > No. > >>> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. >>> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. >> >> Works fine here. > > The usual answer is

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Diddles wrote : > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:52:44 -0600, Jane_Galt wrote: > >> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? >> >> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. >> >> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. > > Works fine here. I have Ver. 2.0.10. > I use it to

Re: Here we go again...crash...crash...crash...SM 2.0.10 Mac

Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:07 -0600, Rufus wrote: Went two days with no crashes, this time I had multiple crashes using two different Profiles - most on restart/start attempts; both in the same Profile and on switching Profiles. Also tried deleting the residual se

Re: Here we go again...crash...crash...crash...SM 2.0.10 Mac

Philip Chee wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:07 -0600, Rufus wrote: Went two days with no crashes, this time I had multiple crashes using two different Profiles - most on restart/start attempts; both in the same Profile and on switching Profiles. Also tried deleting the residual sessiostore.jso

Re: SM 2.0.10 crash

Ray_Net wrote: I was composing a mail and suddently hop a crash ! bp-8ee1cb47-0e72-45c3-a70e-898c02101124 24/11/2010 10:52 The other previous crashes was with a older SM release than the 2.0.10 bp-3ba00bd6-775f-424f-8a47-c07262100906 06/09/2010 16:38 bp-92e89d65-f574-48a7-8004-408392100621 22/06

Re: SM 2.0.10 Mac - crashing...and crashing...and crashing...

Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-11-22 7:13 PM, Rufus wrote: I have have to two Profiles set up, and set up a third one...but none are crashing since the last series. Since then I've also rebuilt my Whereis and Locate databases and updated Prebindings using the MainMenu utility. So far this SM Profile h

Re: how to use my own font color on some websites but NOT all?

Petr Voralek wrote: Hello! On 11/24/2010 06:48 PM, *Margo Guda* wrote, and I quote (in part): two. I'd like to be able to selectively turn font color (only) off and on, preferably with the click of a button or check box. Can anyone point me in the right direction for Seamonkey 2.0?

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

ozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre Ok. Maybe Jane will reply with the version of SeaMonkey she is using ... Webshots stopped working for me several weeks ago, and I wrote them about the problem. In a week it was wor

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent >> string might help. WLS, have you done this? >> > > It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration. > > Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) > Gec

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

la/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) > Gecko/20101125 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre Ok. Maybe Jane will reply with the version of SeaMonkey she is using ... -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

"SeaMonkey". (Yet another example of author bungle.) Adding the oft-mentioned "NOT Firefox" to the SeaMonkey User Agent string might help. WLS, have you done this? It is already in there in the SM 2.1 build configuration. Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on

SM 2.0.10 crash

I was composing a mail and suddently hop a crash ! bp-8ee1cb47-0e72-45c3-a70e-898c02101124 24/11/2010 10:52 The other previous crashes was with a older SM release than the 2.0.10 bp-3ba00bd6-775f-424f-8a47-c07262100906 06/09/2010 16:38 bp-92e89d65-f574-48a7-8004-408392100621 22/06/2010

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

WLS wrote: > Jane_Galt wrote: >> Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? No. >> I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. >> Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. > > Works fine here. The usual answer is the site is using browser sniffing, and won't recognize

Re: command line chrome and URL

Stan Dickerson wrote: How can I start Seamonkey from the command line and pass both "-chrome" and the URL? I just tested and: seamonkey -chrome index.html seems to work for me. It loads a minimal browser without toolbars. I have SeaMonkey set to start to Mail, as I use Firefox as my main bro

Re: Is Seamonkey defunct?

Jane_Galt wrote: Is Seamonkey considered defunct now? I cant even get it to work anymore with my subscription of Webshots. Yet FF and Internet Explorer work with it. Works fine here. I can even delete newsgroup messages now! WLS -- SeaMonkey 2.1b2pre __

Re: how to use my own font color on some websites but NOT all?

Petr Voralek wrote: Hello! On 11/24/2010 06:48 PM, *Margo Guda* wrote, and I quote (in part): two. I'd like to be able to selectively turn font color (only) off and on, preferably with the click of a button or check box. Can anyone point me in the right direction for Seamonkey 2.0?

Re: Here we go again...crash...crash...crash...SM 2.0.10 Mac

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:38:07 -0600, Rufus wrote: > Went two days with no crashes, this time I had multiple crashes using > two different Profiles - most on restart/start attempts; both in the > same Profile and on switching Profiles. Also tried deleting the > residual sessiostore.json file befo

Re: how to use my own font color on some websites but NOT all?

>Margo Guda wrote: >>prefbar [will] just turn off color >> When you top-post, it really screws up the flow of the thread --especially when you are responding to MULTIPLE posts. David E. Ross wrote: >There is no "white list" or "black list" capability for color. >Either you enable it for all Web pa