Publish Feature

2011-07-04 Thread John
I use the Sea monkey Composer but when I click on the Publish to Server option, there is no way to select or browse the folder directories on the remote server, or am I missing something? John -- Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Christ God? After death whats on the other side? If you

Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread David Wilkinson
Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread WLS
David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? There shouldn't be as SeaMonkey 2.2 is going to be the recommended upgrade from 2.0.14. Stay tuned for the announcement. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread David Cox
On 4/07/2011 10:31 PM, WLS wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? There shouldn't be as SeaMonkey 2.2 is going to be the recommended upgrade from 2.0.14. Stay tuned for the announcement. I decided to do that last week and had no

Re: Publish Feature

2011-07-04 Thread WLS
John wrote: I use the Sea monkey Composer but when I click on the Publish to Server option, there is no way to select or browse the folder directories on the remote server, or am I missing something? John Not missing anything. It publishes the file and nothing more, but you can specify a

A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread cmcadams
As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect, but still remarkable. ___

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Rufus
Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even found another one

Thanks for Find in Page Change in 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread Mikalra Smith
Hi there, To any volunteers who worked on changing Find in Page from the annoying, redundant modal window format to the Firefox-esque toolbar: thanks very much! This is SO much smoother to use, avoids accumulating half a dozen open modal windows lurking around, and also avoids having control-g

Re: Anyway to use Sync bookmarks addon with Seamonkey?

2011-07-04 Thread sean nathan bean
WLS sent me the following:: sean bean wrote: WLS wrote: sean bean wrote: goldtech wrote: Hi, Is there anyway to use sync bookmarks addon with SM 2.0.14 ? Right now I have FF installed then I import the syn'd bookmarks from FF to SM... thanks Sync is working quite well in the 2.2a1pre

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread PhillipJones
Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even

Re: Thank you, SM Developers

2011-07-04 Thread sean nathan bean
Stan sent me the following:: I switched over to 2.1 and everything is running fine. There are a couple of add-ons that need updating but I am sure that will get done soon. Thank you all once again for all your hard work. Thanks to you, the developers, people like me have been able to continue

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Rufus
PhillipJones wrote: Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples Safari

Open in New Tab strange results

2011-07-04 Thread Stan
I posted some about this a few weeks ago but never received a response. This does not happen consistently! When I right click on an item in my personal tool bar or a URL in Live Journal (for example), and then select Open in New Tab, I quite often get two new tabs. The first new tab

Re: Thanks for Find in Page Change in 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/4/11 12:13 PM, Mikalra Smith wrote: Hi there, To any volunteers who worked on changing Find in Page from the annoying, redundant modal window format to the Firefox-esque toolbar: thanks very much! This is SO much smoother to use, avoids accumulating half a dozen open modal windows

Re: Seamonkey2 - themes issues

2011-07-04 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 01:22, Bret Busby told the world: My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the Seamonkey to version 2. It has changed the appearance of Seamonkey, to some silly looking theme, that is listed as the default theme. It appears that

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 14:57, cmcadams told the world: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect, but still

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread cmcadams
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 14:57, cmcadams told the world: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect,

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread d...@kd4e.com
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 14:57, cmcadams told the world: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect,

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world: I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand new* product - that certainly isn't impossible or not allowed, and there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples store ranging from

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread NoOp
On 07/04/2011 04:12 PM, MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 14:57, cmcadams told the world: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the next 2 weeks we'll setup an automatic update from 2.0 to 2.2 as well. --

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Rufus
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world: I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand new* product - that certainly isn't impossible or not allowed, and there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples store

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Lee
On 7/4/11, Rufus n...@home.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples Safari

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread JD
cmcadams wrote: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect, but still remarkable. Or:

Re: Thanks for Find in Page Change in 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread JD
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/4/11 12:13 PM, Mikalra Smith wrote: Hi there, To any volunteers who worked on changing Find in Page from the annoying, redundant modal window format to the Firefox-esque toolbar: thanks very much! This is SO much smoother to use, avoids accumulating half a dozen open

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Rufus
Lee wrote: On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 -- worst version ever

2011-07-04 Thread Rufus
Lee wrote: On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers that *directly* compete with Apples

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread JD
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the next 2 weeks we'll setup an automatic update from

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the next 2 weeks we'll setup an automatic update from

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the

Re: Skipping version 2.1

2011-07-04 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 7/5/2011 12:30 AM, JD wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max -- likely tomorrow) and in the next 2 weeks

Re: A js-based PDF reader

2011-07-04 Thread cmcadams
JD wrote: cmcadams wrote: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect, but still remarkable. Or: