Re: Tab group behavior a little off?

Rickles wrote: OS is WinXP Pro SP3, patched/updated. Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Have been using SM for years (thanks, devs), only upgraded from v2.0.14 to 2.3 as a full-install-overwrite last night. Home page: defined as a group of

czech language pack for 2.3

Hello, I'm encountering problems when trying to install the czech language pack, as per the link found in the downloads section of the seamonkey web site: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.3.1/langpack/seamonkey-2.3.1.cs.langpack.xpi Despite this language pack

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Michal Svoboda wrote: I'm encountering problems when trying to install the czech language pack, as per the link found in the downloads section of the seamonkey web site: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.3.1/langpack/seamonkey-2.3.1.cs.langpack.xpi

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: it worked for me. Seamonkey 2.3.1 under Windows/XP PRO;SP3 Does not work here. Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110817 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Please advise. ___

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Your build identifier shews your browser as 2.3, not as 2.3.1, Michal : here is my build identifier -- Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110820 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3.1 Is it possible that the language pack is /only/ compatible with V2.3.1, and not with V2.3 ?

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Is it possible that the language pack is /only/ compatible with V2.3.1, and not with V2.3 ? If so, is there any reason why you could not upgrade to V2.3.1 ? Hmm, you're right, it's a 2.3. Is there anyplace I could grab the language pack for 2.3? The

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Michal Svoboda wrote: Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Is it possible that the language pack is /only/ compatible with V2.3.1, and not with V2.3 ? If so, is there any reason why you could not upgrade to V2.3.1 ? Hmm, you're right, it's a 2.3. Is there anyplace I could grab the

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Michal Svoboda schrieb: Hmm, you're right, it's a 2.3. Is there anyplace I could grab the language pack for 2.3? The site releases.mozilla.org only seems to have 2.2 and 2.3.1, so does any of its mirrors.

Re: czech language pack for 2.3

Robert Kaiser wrote: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/2.3/langpack/seamonkey-2.3.cs.langpack.xpi Thanks that did it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Email messages delete slow in 2.3

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: flyguy wrote: if you'd read his message... you'd know he already tried compact... Did he compact the Trash folder? I wasn't sure from his description if he'd done that. In every version of SeaMonkey I've ever had, telling the program to compact folders has resulted

Re: Tab group behavior a little off?

Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: OS is WinXP Pro SP3, patched/updated. Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Have been using SM for years (thanks, devs), only upgraded from v2.0.14 to 2.3 as a full-install-overwrite last night. Home page: defined

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I think the majority of users would agree. Since Firefox and SeaMonkey embarked on their accelerated release schedule, we've seen

Re: Tab group behavior a little off?

Rickles wrote: Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: OS is WinXP Pro SP3, patched/updated. Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Have been using SM for years (thanks, devs), only upgraded from v2.0.14 to 2.3 as a full-install-overwrite last night.

Seamonkey 2.2 to 2.3.1 Fer it or Again it?

So I got 2.2, a huge disappointment with lots of annoying bugs in mail and one big one in web (RMB context menu bug). The new level of issues makes me scared to update, even though this is the most buggy version of since perhaps Moz 0.6. So what are the big new 2.3.1 issues that were not in

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote: John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I think the majority of users would agree. Since Firefox and SeaMonkey embarked on their

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

Ron Hunter wrote: On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote: John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I think the majority of users would agree. Since Firefox and SeaMonkey

Re: Tab group behavior a little off?

Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: OS is WinXP Pro SP3, patched/updated. Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Have been using SM for years (thanks, devs), only upgraded from v2.0.14 to 2.3 as a full-install-overwrite

Re: Forwarding graphics

flyguy wrote: I have the opposite problem: when I get an email with text and graphics, the graphics are not loaded (intentionally - I have remote images blocked); when I click on forward to forward the email, the images are loaded. I can work around it (if I remember in time) by going offline,

Re: Seamonkey 2.2 to 2.3.1 Fer it or Again it?

hawker wrote: So I got 2.2, a huge disappointment with lots of annoying bugs in mail and one big one in web (RMB context menu bug). (...) So what are the big new 2.3.1 issues that were not in 2.2? The following page lists all fixes that 2.3.1 contains but 2.2 doesn't:

Re: Forwarding graphics

Mike wrote: flyguy wrote: I have the opposite problem: when I get an email with text and graphics, the graphics are not loaded (intentionally - I have remote images blocked); when I click on forward to forward the email, the images are loaded. I can work around it (if I remember in time) by

Re: Seamonkey 2.2 to 2.3.1 Fer it or Again it?

On 8/29/2011 10:15 AM hawker submitted the following: So I got 2.2, a huge disappointment with lots of annoying bugs in mail and one big one in web (RMB context menu bug). The new level of issues makes me scared to update, even though this is the most buggy version of since perhaps Moz 0.6. So

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

Daniel wrote: Ron Hunter wrote: On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote: John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I think the majority of users would agree. Since Firefox and

Quicktime installer - associated helper application does not exist

I went to the addons page. I clicked on the line to check for updates. It sent me to a mozilla firefox page that shows my addons and which ones need to be updated. I click on the first one for Quicktime. It sends me to a Quicktime page. I click the download button, it starts to download. At the

Re: Forwarding graphics

On 8/29/2011 9:49 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Mike wrote: flyguy wrote: I have the opposite problem: when I get an email with text and graphics, the graphics are not loaded (intentionally - I have remote images blocked); when I click on forward to forward the email, the images are loaded. I

Re: Quicktime installer - associated helper application does not exist

Marilyn G wrote: I went to the addons page. I clicked on the line to check for updates. It sent me to a mozilla firefox page that shows my addons and which ones need to be updated. I click on the first one for Quicktime. It sends me to a Quicktime page. I click the download button, it starts to

Re: Email messages delete slow in 2.3

Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: flyguy wrote: if you'd read his message... you'd know he already tried compact... Did he compact the Trash folder? I wasn't sure from his description if he'd done that. In every version of SeaMonkey I've ever had, telling the program to compact

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

Michael Gordon wrote: Daniel wrote: Ron Hunter wrote: On 8/29/2011 8:16 AM, Daniel wrote: John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. The web browser and email client are critically important to me, and I think the majority of users would

Re: Tab group behavior a little off?

Rickles wrote: Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: Daniel wrote: Rickles wrote: OS is WinXP Pro SP3, patched/updated. Browser is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110813 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3 Have been using SM for years (thanks, devs), only upgraded from v2.0.14 to 2.3 as a

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

The next version of Firefox (version 7.0) is scheduled for 27th September 2011. Please make a note in your diary! Good luck. John wrote: I use SeaMonkey most of the time and Firefox occasionally. I try never to use IE. snipped ___

Re: Quicktime installer - associated helper application does not exist

On 8/29/11 7:04 PM, PhillipJones wrote: Marilyn G wrote: I went to the addons page. I clicked on the line to check for updates. It sent me to a mozilla firefox page that shows my addons and which ones need to be updated. I click on the first one for Quicktime. It sends me to a Quicktime page.