On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 20:37:41 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Ralph Fox wrote:
>
>> Even if the recipient does have Wingdings, the recipient can still see
>> a "J" like the OP did.
>>
>> * The Unicode value for "J" is 74 (U+004A).
>> * But the Wingdings font's smiley face has a different _Uni
Daniel wrote on 10-12-16 10:14:
On 10/12/2016 9:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 09-12-16 22:16:
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything
On 10/12/2016 9:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 09-12-16 22:16:
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything other than J.
In an HTML page (
Ralph Fox wrote:
Even if the recipient does have Wingdings, the recipient can still see
a "J" like the OP did.
* The Unicode value for "J" is 74 (U+004A).
* But the Wingdings font's smiley face has a different _Unicode_ value
61514 (U+F04A) in the Wingdings font's cmap.
A program us
Richmond wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download
and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the
prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a
reasonable thing for an end user to do.
When you say "fo
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:56:59 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> You cannot do that if you don't have the Microsoft Wingdings font
>> (because you aren't using Microsoft).
The OP is running Windows 7. It is highly likely that the OP does have
the Wingdings font installed.
>
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
> True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download
> and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the
> prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a
> reasonable thing for an end user to do.
>
When you say "for free" do
Richmond wrote:
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the
font Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as
it's told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point.
That wouldn't be a violation, would it?
You cann
"Paul B. Gallagher" writes:
>
> In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font
> Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as it's
> told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point. That
> wouldn't be a violation, would it?
>
You cannot do tha
Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 09-12-16 22:16:
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything other than J.
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specif
David E. Ross wrote:
It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment
to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to
render 0x004A as anything other than J.
In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font
Wingdings and sends the charac
On 12/9/2016 7:50 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
>> "David E. Ross" writes:
>>
>>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
>>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
>> But while we are waiting for the ideal world, w
Ray_Net writes:
> Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
>> "David E. Ross" writes:
>>
>>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
>>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
>> But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
>> pra
Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03:
"David E. Ross" writes:
I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
pragmatic. Senders with MS Office don'
Ant writes:
> Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/smiley-fixer/versions/ and
> force an install with its reboot. It didn't work. :( Did it work for anyone
> else in SM v2.40?
It seems to work for me with Aurora, I have not yet tried 2.40.
"David E. Ross" writes:
>
> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent
> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is
But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be
pragmatic. Senders with MS Office don't know what they are doing
typi
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> writes:
> You must set the font for the J or L to be Wingdings, which means the
> message may need to be HTML.
> My SM doesn't let me select Wingdings in the HTML compose window.
> But I can insert the required HTML code using "Insert >> HTML...".
>
> HTML code
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:03:36 -0800, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/8/2016 3:42 PM, Ralph Fox wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:06:24 +, Richmond wrote:
Ant writes:
Smiley Fixer looks like a likely candidate.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/smiley-fixer/
Thanks, but it didn't wo
On 12/8/2016 3:42 PM, Ralph Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:06:24 +, Richmond wrote:
>> Ant writes:
Smiley Fixer looks like a likely candidate.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/smiley-fixer/
>>> Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried
>>> https://addons.mozil
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:06:24 +,
Richmond wrote:
Ant writes:
Smiley Fixer looks like a likely candidate.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/smiley-fixer/
Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried
http
Ant writes:
>>
>> Smiley Fixer looks like a likely candidate.
>>
>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/smiley-fixer/
>
> Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/smiley-fixer/versions/ and
> force an install with its reboot. It
On 12/8/2016 1:16 AM, Richmond wrote:
Perhaps there is a Thunderbird add-on for this, as Richmond has
replied. But the closest I could find was this Firefox add-on:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-page-fixer/
Details
The sender is using HTML to set the font to Wingdings for
On 12/8/2016 1:00 AM, Ralph Fox wrote:
...
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis)
correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
Thank you in advance. :) [old school 1 line ASCII arts FTW :P]
It is not an ASCII emoticon like ":)" is. It is a single character in
the Wing
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> writes:
> Perhaps there is a Thunderbird add-on for this, as Richmond has
> replied. But the closest I could find was this Firefox add-on:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-page-fixer/
>
> Details
> The sender is using HTML to set the font to
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:56:23 -0800, Ant
wrote:
Subject: "J" instead of Outlook's happy
face?
Hello.
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis)
correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
On 12/7/2016 5:39 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Edit > Preferences > Mail & Newsgroups > Message Display
...
Plain text messages
...
X Display emoticons as graphics
Also I think you need the "-" :-P not :P
Ah, there it is. However, my "Display emoticons as graphics" option is
already checke
Ant wrote:
> On 12/7/2016 12:08 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
>
>>> Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis) correctly
>>> in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
>>
>> See if you can find something in SeaMonkey similar to what I have in
>> Thunderbird. After all, they both use a com
On 12/7/2016 12:08 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis) correctly
in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
See if you can find something in SeaMonkey similar to what I have in
Thunderbird. After all, they both use a common MailNews core.
In Thund
On 12/7/2016 1:29 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis)
correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
I have the same problem.
A friend using
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Send me mails where he insert a smiling face ... But SM see
Ant writes:
> Hello.
>
> Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis) correctly in
> SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
>
> Thank you in advance. :) [old school 1 line ASCII arts FTW :P]
There is a thunderbird add on for that. Unfortunately I cannot remember
what it's called. But
On 12/7/2016 12:45 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
> Ant wrote on 07-12-16 20:56:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis)
>> correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
>>
> I have the same problem.
> A friend using
>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
>
> Send
Ant wrote on 07-12-16 20:56:
Hello.
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis)
correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
I have the same problem.
A friend using
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Send me mails where he insert a smiling face ... But SM see only
On 12/7/2016 11:56 AM, Ant wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis) correctly
> in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
>
> Thank you in advance. :) [old school 1 line ASCII arts FTW :P]
>
See if you can find something in SeaMonkey similar to what I have i
Hello.
Is there something I need to show these emoticons (not emojis) correctly
in SeaMonkey v2.40's e-mail client?
Thank you in advance. :) [old school 1 line ASCII arts FTW :P]
--
"Oh bother", said Winnie the Pooh, "There's an ant on my foot..."
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace,
34 matches
Mail list logo
