Terry R. wrote:
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, Terry R. terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com
On Apr 1, 9:21 am, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
Terry R. wrote:
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, Terry R. terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time
The date and time was Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:21:36 AM, and on a
whim, Ray_Net pounded out on the keyboard:
I can see how it is confusing, although I agree with the method. Most
of us write a message and send it off. I compose in HTML and I have a
serif font as my default. I have my
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Apr 1, 9:21 am, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
Terry R. wrote:
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:48:11 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, Terry R. terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
that starts Me. When I go into the
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML,
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML,
NoOp wrote:
On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50
or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems
sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time,
if I send
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50
or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems
sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the
On Mar 31, 7:11 pm, Terry R. terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time was Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:03:07 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 31, 4:54 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
SM doesn't convert it properly all the time,
If you cannot furnish a testcase to reproduce the problem, nobody will
be able to solve your problem.
But i repeat if you position your preference to send only in html - and
if you at least put an html stuff into your
Yes - putting stuff in every message that forces the converter to say
send in HTML is a common workaround that a lot of people do (see the
original thread I referenced at the top of this one). Having a fancy
HTML signature also works as a workaround.
In fact, it looks like the workarounds are
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Yes - putting stuff in every message that forces the converter to say
send in HTML is a common workaround that a lot of people do (see the
original thread I referenced at the top of this one). Having a fancy
HTML signature also works as a workaround.
In fact, it looks
I wish Mozilla did allow me a choice. No matter how hard I try to
have messages go, by default, in HTML. Mozilla looks at them and says
yeah, plain text is good enough and converts them.
that's the problem.
All I'm suggesting is an OPTION to disable the auto-conversion. I
can't believe how
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
that starts Me. When I go into the sent folder and do a view -
message source, the blank line is there (although the message has been
converted to text).
However,
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
I wish Mozilla did allow me a choice. No matter how hard I try to
have messages go, by default, in HTML. Mozilla looks at them and says
yeah, plain text is good enough and converts them.
that's the problem.
All I'm suggesting is an OPTION to disable the
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
again, others have asked that you email them an html
message and then we'll go from there, and so far you
have failed to do that.
I'm happy to send a message to anyone. just supply the email
I think you're using
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was
trying to be space efficient.
not everyone is viewing this group on google groups.
Some of us
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior messages show up, I was
trying to be space efficient.
not everyone is viewing this group on
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
again, others have asked that you email them an html
message and then we'll go from there, and so far you
have failed to do that.
I'm happy to send a message to anyone. just
On Mar 30, 5:41 pm, Leonidas Jones leonidasjo...@netscape.net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
again, others have asked that you email them an html
message and then we'll go from there, and so far
The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Sorry - i'm viewing on the web where all prior
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
that starts Me. When I go into the sent folder and do a view -
message source, the blank line is there (although the message has been
On Mar 30, 6:58 pm, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be
wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Ok - here's an example of the problem, based on a short message I
composed in HTML. In HTML, there was a blank line before the line
that starts Me. When I go into the sent folder and do a view
On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, Terry R. terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
peter.potamus.the.purple.hi...@gmail.com wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, Terry R.terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
On Mar 30, 9:28 pm, Leonidas Jones leonidasjo...@netscape.net wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 6:44 pm, Terry R.terry.f1...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
The date and time was Monday, March 30, 2009 2:25:55 PM, and on a whim,
googl...@kwcpa.com pounded out on the keyboard:
On Mar
On 03/30/2009 04:45 PM, Daniel wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50
or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems
sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time,
if I send in a
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
2) We both agree that, for example, if I write a message in Comic Sans
MS, and want my messages to go out IN THAT FONT (because that's the
way I like people to see my messages)
Welcome to the web. Here, /we/ decide how to view your e-mail messages.
Yes, Thanks for the welcome, but I've been on since '96. Many people
choose to view in the format that people send.
No offense, because this isn't directed primarily at you, but I never
thought I would stumble across a religious EMail must travel as plain
text if at all possible war here. I
Hi Daniel - Thanks for dropping in. If you look back at the last 50
or so responses, about 1/2 are devoted to reasons why I have problems
sending in plain text. SM doesn't convert it properly all the time,
if I send in a proportional font, I want people to read it in a
proportional font, etc. I
Hi Ray-net - actually a good Email, as you confirmed my issue -
Thanks. However, your conclusions are incorrect...
if you don't use any html gadget when composing your mail... the mail
is sent in plain text.
I absolutely agree - thanks!
In this case, there is no need of a conversion, because
Hi
1) I obviously cannot send you a sample.txt file for an INTERMITTENT
issue.
2) We both agree that, for example, if I write a message in Comic Sans
MS, and want my messages to go out IN THAT FONT (because that's the
way I like people to see my messages), there's no way to do that
without
a)
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Dear Mr. Potamus. You should really View Message Source and you will
see what i mean. I just sent myself an Email composed in HTML, and
having that
I haven't tried SM2 - still using SM1 - this was a request for SM2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Thanks Peter - that's indeed an option, for, as posted when sending
formatted messages and one or more recipients are not listed as being
able to receive HTML. However, if you don't fill in any HTML or
PlainText Domains, then, regardless of which of the 4 settings you
choose from that menu,
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Thanks Peter - that's indeed an option, for, as posted when sending
formatted messages and one or more recipients are not listed as being
able to receive HTML. However, if you don't fill in any HTML or
PlainText Domains, then, regardless of which of the 4 settings you
Dear Mr. Potamus. You should really View Message Source and you will
see what i mean. I just sent myself an Email composed in HTML, and
having that setting you refer to set to HTML only. Here's what I
received...
-
Subject: test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Dear Mr. Potamus. You should really View Message Source and you will
see what i mean. I just sent myself an Email composed in HTML, and
having that setting you refer to set to HTML only. Here's what I
received...
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Dear Mr. Potamus. You should really View Message Source and you will
see what i mean. I just sent myself an Email composed in HTML, and
having that setting you refer to set to HTML only.
Dear Mr. Potamus...
ME I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back plain text
YOU: if you have the setting to HTML and Plain text, scroll down to
see the HTML:
ME: I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back ONLY plain text,
nothing to scroll down to
YOU: To view, its: View, Message
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Dear Mr. Potamus...
ME I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back plain text
YOU: if you have the setting to HTML and Plain text, scroll down to
see the HTML:
ME: I have it set to send ONLY HTML, and I get back ONLY plain text,
nothing to scroll down to
YOU: To
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
No offense Mr. Potamus, but I have been a Netscape/Mozilla/Seamonkey
user for 24 years,
impossible. That would be around 1985, and Netscape
came out in the early 90's.
followup set to mozilla.general
--
*IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Sir - why would you change the subject of my request, which I have
proven is legitimate, to OT:?
I'm sorry your solutions don't work. Your logic If I can't help him,
then I don't want anyone else to is so counter to the spirit of this
forum, and this program, that I
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
YOU: what developers? No developers have been here to say anything
about this.
ME: Developer input from earlier in this thread...
==
The forum thread points to bug 157346 which has been resolved as a
duplicate of bug 136502. Comment 8
Ray_Net wrote:
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
YOU: what developers? No developers have been here to say anything
about this.
ME: Developer input from earlier in this thread...
==
The forum thread points to bug 157346 which has been resolved as a
duplicate of bug
I work with SM 1.1.14.
On my mail account - View Settings for this account - Composition
Adressing - I have the option Compose messages in HTML format SET.
So there is no need to do something for each mail sent.
In addition, when in mail - Options - Format - is by default set to
Yes Ray - that option is there - Feel free to set it. I have mine
set. Doesn't make any difference. Seamonkey will STILL convert your
messages to plain text when it thinks it's appropriate. So if you
want to be sure that you send in HTML, you MUST do something for EACH
Email. This is well
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Yes Ray - that option is there - Feel free to set it. I have mine
set. Doesn't make any difference. Seamonkey will STILL convert your
messages to plain text when it thinks it's appropriate. So if you
want to be sure that you send in HTML, you MUST do something for
I agree with Mr. Barclay, but there is much to do and only so much
free labor. So I limit my request to simply providing an option to
turn off the I think you should send plain text, so I will convert it
for you feature.
/j
Perhaps there's some lynx or links2 code that could be used in
Yes Lee, I can. But I'm a bit tired of having to do Options - Format
- Send
for -every- single email that I send.
That's why I'm politely requesting the option disable auto-
conversion to plain text.
Thanks! 8-}
/j
Look in Send Format.
You can make your preferred selection there.
Lee
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Mr Gehr - that option is there, and does the opposite of what I want
it to do. Not choosing that option does not keep SM from converting
my message. See the original threads I quoted. What I am asking for,
which is
Disable automatic conversion to plan text.
So the
On Mar 16, 4:02 pm, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
See the original threads I quoted. What I am asking for,
which is
Disable automatic conversion to plantext.
So the message will be readable by all the mail agents which handle HTML but
not
plaintext?
Why do you care? I assume
Mr. Hansen - I don't think you're following.
In order to don't do that, I have to go Options-Format-Rich (HTML)
Text, for -every- message. I believe that SM starts with each message
set to HTML, but after I click Send, I believe SM reviews the message
and decides whether to convert to Plain
On 03/13/09 09:54 am, googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
Mr. Hansen - I don't think you're following.
In order to don't do that, I have to go Options-Format-Rich (HTML)
Text, for -every- message. I believe that SM starts with each message
set to HTML, but after I click Send, I believe SM reviews the
Mr Gehr - that option is there, and does the opposite of what I want
it to do. Not choosing that option does not keep SM from converting
my message. See the original threads I quoted. What I am asking for,
which is
Disable automatic conversion to plan text.
Is NOT a current option anywhere in
googl...@kwcpa.com wrote:
I don't know if SM converts from html to plain text badly or not,
but,
if it does convert badly, wouldn't that be an even better reason to
NOT
send in htlm so that there is no conversion necessary???
SM converts from HTML to Plain Text BADLY. Take my word for it.
google00@ kwcpa.com wrote:
SM converts from HTML to Plain Text BADLY. Take my word for it.
Biggest problem is that paragraph breaks are reduced,
eliminating blank line between paragraphs.
Text also sometimes wraps improperly
(Newlines appear in the middle of lines).
So i compose in HTML by
nore...@invalid.com wrote:
Answer - when Seamonkey converts to plain text it does so BADLY.
Most paragraph breaks are removed (no blank line between paragraphs) and
sometimes lines are broken at odd boundaries. I think there are explainable
anomalies for this behavior, but either SM needs a
60 matches
Mail list logo
