Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 26 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 20 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, would be
perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a
URL, autofill might be
Le 26 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
> Lucas Levrel wrote:
> > Le 20 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
> > > Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, would be
> > > perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a
> > > URL, autofill might be
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 20 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, would be
perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a
URL, autofill might be the right interface.
Are you sure Form Autofill cannot save more
Le 20 novembre 2009, Bill Davidsen a écrit :
> Handling multiple forms per URL, covering all filled fields, would be
> perfect for almost any use. And if there was only one saved form for a
> URL, autofill might be the right interface.
Are you sure Form Autofill cannot save more than one form pe
Philip Chee wrote:
I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension
which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms
as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data.
Another extension supporting form filling calling itself iM
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:32 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
Yes I am glad to see consideration of putting a legitimate Forms Manager
Back. I would prefer one that worked similar to the one in SM1.1.8; But
one based on the form History Manager Plugin would do.
OK there are act
Lucas Levrel wrote:
On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote:
I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill
extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows
autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored
forms data.
Just had a look to t
whole forms, requires an extension to get
minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used
existing part of SM.
< sigh>.. bring back form manger.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski
wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
uires an extension to get
minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used
existing part of SM.
< sigh>.. bring back form manger.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski
wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old
> On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote:
> > I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill
> > extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows
> > autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored
> > forms data.
Just had a look to this ex
On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote:
1. The form autofill functionality that fills forms up on a page.
The first is more problematic since the code lives somewhere in toolkit
and is written mostly in C++.
I filed an enhancement bug for what I think is the common case:
https://bugzilla.mozi
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:32 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
> Yes I am glad to see consideration of putting a legitimate Forms Manager
> Back. I would prefer one that worked similar to the one in SM1.1.8; But
> one based on the form History Manager Plugin would do.
OK there are actually two parts
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Fi
to get
minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used
existing part of SM.
< sigh>.. bring back form manger.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski
wrote:
>Philip Chee wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
>>
&
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final>
Look und
Interviewed by CNN on 18/11/2009 00:37, George Carden told the world:
> Great to know! What about some sort of Googlebar for 2.0? I loved that
> thing, and would love to get back to it ASAP in 2.0
Well, Googlebar is an extension. It's not really the job of the group
who is developing the main a
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Fi
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
Restore the old Form Manager!
...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final>
Look und
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote:
> Restore the old Form Manager!
> ...please...
We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday.
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final>
Look under the feedback se
...please...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
20 matches
Mail list logo
