Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-19 Thread Mort
Robert Kaiser wrote: Mort wrote: I did just that, and the screen says that there are no updates available. That's strange, but I believe you. So, do I go with the download URL that connects to a German server that is allegedly not verifiable? I really would like to download an duse the lates

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-19 Thread Robert Kaiser
Mort wrote: I did just that, and the screen says that there are no updates available. That's strange, but I believe you. So, do I go with the download URL that connects to a German server that is allegedly not verifiable? I really would like to download an duse the latest version = 2.0.1. I

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-18 Thread Mort
Robert Kaiser wrote: Mort wrote: The download for SM 2.0.1 is not verifiable, has no certified signature, and per my current SM 2, cannot be trusted. That's your operating system telling that, not your SeaMonkey. What do I do about downloading the new version? Is there is a safe download URL

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-18 Thread Robert Kaiser
Mort wrote: The download for SM 2.0.1 is not verifiable, has no certified signature, and per my current SM 2, cannot be trusted. That's your operating system telling that, not your SeaMonkey. What do I do about downloading the new version? Is there is a safe download URL? Yes, use the "Help

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-17 Thread Paul
Paul wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 unti

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-17 Thread NoOp
On 12/17/2009 05:40 PM, Mort wrote: ... > Hi, > > The download for SM 2.0.1 is not verifiable, has no certified signature, > and per my current SM 2, cannot be trusted. The download notice is from > Germany. (No slur intended, just the facts.) > What do I do about downloading the new version? Is

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-17 Thread Mort
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago,

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Paul
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago,

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Kaiser
Paul wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117.

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Kaiser
Mark Hansen wrote: What this means is that SM 1.1.18 is vulnerable to any security holes discovered by the "bad guys" since it was delivered, and it's only going to get worse as time moves on and new vulnerabilities are discovered. Even worse, Paul says he's using 1.1.17, which allows all SSL c

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Rufus
John wrote: Rufus wrote: John wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread John
Rufus wrote: John wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then we

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Rufus
John wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117.

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Paul
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still w

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread John
Mark Hansen wrote: On 12/16/2009 2:45 PM, John wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Mark Hansen
On 12/16/2009 2:45 PM, John wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Paul wrote: >>> John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. >>> >>> I used Netsc

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread John
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still w

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Bill Davidsen
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still w

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread John Doue
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still w

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread John
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still w

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Kaiser
Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still with 1117. I should be

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-15 Thread John
John Doue wrote: Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still wi

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-15 Thread John Doue
Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still with 1117. I should

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-14 Thread John
Paul wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still with 1117. I should

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-14 Thread Paul
John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I used Netscape 4.08 until a year ago, then went to SM 1117. I am still with 1117. I should be good now u

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-14 Thread question
Norvin wrote: John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I went back to, didn't want the hassle that SM2.0 brought with it. Welcome Back to the Rea

Re: SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-14 Thread Norvin
John wrote: Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. I went back to, didn't want the hassle that SM2.0 brought with it.

SM2.0 vs 1.1.18

2009-12-14 Thread John
Just re installed 1.1.18 and all the problems I had with SM2.0 vanished. It was really annoying using SM2.0 it kept asking for a username & password for email accounts. ugly. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https