Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: Hi ! The link must not be a link, just a pure text like: FRITZ!Box Über HTTPS: 87.147.32.46 hi again, of course... i wrote the wrong words. :-( I'm sorry! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 04/10/2016 11:47: Hi Ray, But it's still detected as a SCAM. Have look of my last post where I suggest a modification of the mail sent. found out the same some mitutes ago. However - i've contacted the manufacturer of the fritz!box and hope to get a response, that will

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel
On 4/10/2016 7:29 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote on 04/10/2016 10:12: On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org";>

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Hi Ray, > But it's still detected as a SCAM. > Have look of my last post where I suggest a modification of the mail sent. found out the same some mitutes ago. However - i've contacted the manufacturer of the fritz!box and hope to get a response, that will solve this problem. I'll post a follow-up

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 11:07: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Yes. If you click the link in Ray_Net's message, SM won't take you right there. First it will warn you: SeaMonkey thinks this website is suspicious! It may be trying to impersonate the web page you want to visit. Most legitimate websit

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:54: Ray_Net schrieb: TEST 6 FRITZ!Box über HTTPS: https://87.147.32.46";>https://87.147.32.46 and the scam is detected not because the real url is not the url shown - BUT because the url is an ip-adress. when you have an ip-adress ..

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Yes. If you click the link in Ray_Net's message, SM won't take you right there. First it will warn you: SeaMonkey thinks this website is suspicious! It may be trying to impersonate the web page you want to visit. Most legitimate websites use names instead of numbers. A

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Ray_Net wrote: uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:31: Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! Hi ! Thanks for forwarding I have found the culprit I have done the test number 6 mimicking your offending mail - this is what

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: TEST 6 FRITZ!Box über HTTPS: https://87.147.32.46";>https://87.147.32.46 and the scam is detected not because the real url is not the url shown - BUT because the url is an ip-adress. when you have an ip-adress You don't known where you will

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
uku69 wrote on 04/10/2016 10:31: Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! Hi ! Thanks for forwarding I have found the culprit I have done the test number 6 mimicking your offending mail - this is what I have:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread uku69
Ray_Net schrieb: So the best idea is that you forward me your offending mail at my mailbox. Done - thanks! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Daniel wrote on 04/10/2016 10:12: On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org";>Fritz Perfectly ACCEPTED when downloa

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Daniel
On 4/10/2016 7:23 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org";>Fritz Perfectly ACCEPTED when downloaded I have tested sending to myself:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-04 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 03/10/2016 22:50: another idea - what especially marks an "internet address"? The correct link sample will be as following: https://dyn.dns.org";>Fritz!Box - may cause the "!" this behaviour? I have done another test as per your example. This mail contains: TEST

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
another idea - what especially marks an "internet address"? The correct link sample will be as following: https://dyn.dns.org";>Fritz!Box - may cause the "!" this behaviour? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 22:03:18 UTC+2 schrieb Ray_Net: Hi Ray, first - thanks fro testing! > > Regards, Uwe. > > > I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change > the content of your mail. not really. the mail will be generated by the hardware i use. Of course that

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Ray_Net wrote: I don't really understand, because if you are the sender, you can change the content of your mail. I have tested sending to myself: test1 http://dyn.dns.org";>Fritz Perfectly ACCEPTED when downloaded I have tested sending to myself: test2 http://dyn.dns.org";>http://www.microsoft

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 03/10/2016 16:11: Hi Ray, So ask the sender to stop showing an url adress and if you click on it, you will be directed to ANOTHER url adress. You must be directed on the url adress that is shown .. NOT on another one. The sender => I am. Can I change the content of this

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread EE
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote: Hi folks, I am using seamokey for a long while and I'm mostly satified ;-) One of the things that bothers me, is the fact, that some e-mails from definitly trustworthy adresses will be marked as scam. I can't find a solution, that leaves the scam filter ON in genera

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Hi Ray, > So ask the sender to stop showing an url adress and if you click on it, > you will be directed to ANOTHER url adress. > You must be directed on the url adress that is shown .. NOT on another one. The sender => I am. Can I change the content of this mail? => No. For better understanding:

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Ray_Net
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote on 03/10/2016 14:21: Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 12:24:08 UTC+2 schrieb Paul B. Gallagher: FWIW, SM doesn't evaluate the sender. It just checks HTML links to see whether the display address and the target match. If they don't, it treats that as a scam. Hi Paul, sorry, I do

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 12:24:08 UTC+2 schrieb Paul B. Gallagher: > FWIW, SM doesn't evaluate the sender. It just checks HTML links to see > whether the display address and the target match. If they don't, it > treats that as a scam. Hi Paul, sorry, I don't understand. The problem I have, is

Re: Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Uwe R. Kunzmann wrote: Hi folks, I am using seamokey for a long while and I'm mostly satified ;-) One of the things that bothers me, is the fact, that some e-mails from definitly trustworthy adresses will be marked as scam. FWIW, SM doesn't evaluate the sender. It just checks HTML links to s

Sea Monkey & SCAM: Looking for a possibility, to mark several adresses as "No SCAM"

2016-10-03 Thread Uwe R. Kunzmann
Hi folks, I am using seamokey for a long while and I'm mostly satified ;-) One of the things that bothers me, is the fact, that some e-mails from definitly trustworthy adresses will be marked as scam. I can't find a solution, that leaves the scam filter ON in general, but marks special