Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On 3/31/2020 1:20 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... I would also expect all sites delivering Flash content to modernize their sites before that deadline. Let's hope so. They will probably wait until the last minute or next year to do that. Our coronavirus crisis isn't helping too. :( -- ..!..

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On 3/31/20 3:56 PM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 3:44:19 PM UTC-4, David E. Ross wrote: On 3/31/2020 11:25 AM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? Adobe, the current developer of Flash, announced almost three

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 3:44:19 PM UTC-4, David E. Ross wrote: > On 3/31/2020 11:25 AM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: > > Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? > > > > Adobe, the current developer of Flash, announced almost three years ago > that development and

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 3:44:19 PM UTC-4, David E. Ross wrote: > On 3/31/2020 11:25 AM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: > > Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? > > > > Adobe, the current developer of Flash, announced almost three years ago > that development and

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

Understood.. But it was not 100% until Microsoft released on (September 9, 2019) that it will pull it from IE and Edge (just rebuilt on the chromium platform that hate flash to say the least.. It will still kinda render SWF file but completely ignores CFSWF files. )

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 3:44:19 PM UTC-4, David E. Ross wrote: > On 3/31/2020 11:25 AM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: > > Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? > > > > Adobe, the current developer of Flash, announced almost three years ago > that development and

Re: Flash Player and SeaMonkey

On 3/31/2020 11:25 AM, will.winf...@gmail.com wrote: > Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? > Adobe, the current developer of Flash, announced almost three years ago that development and distribution of Flash would cease the end of 2020. -- David E. Ross

Flash Player and SeaMonkey

Will sea monkey continue to support flash play past 2020? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/29/2020 9:30 AM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/28/2020 8:42 AM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/29/2020 9:30 AM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/28/2020 8:42 AM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/29/2020 9:30 AM, Danny Kile wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 2/28/2020 8:42 AM, Danny Kile wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote: On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48:

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/28/2020 8:42 AM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/28/2020 8:42 AM, Danny Kile wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: > David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: > >> On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: >> >>> David E. Ross

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/27/2020 3:03 PM, Danny Kile wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: >>> On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: > >> I believe the preference variable is >>

Autoplay on/off is in the preferences of 2.53.1 b1 preferences (was: Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems)

If you are running SeaMonkey 2.53.1 b1 you can easily turn autoplay using the preferences. Open Preferences and click on Appearance->Media and uncheck the box "Enable Autoplay of HTML5 media content". alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote:

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled.

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Hi, David E. Ross! Thanks for writing, on 27 Feb 20 02:00: On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/26/2020 9:32 AM, alexyu wrote: > David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: > >> On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: >> >>> David E. Ross wrote: >>> I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled.

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

alexyu wrote: David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled.  If true, HTML5 media is enabled. At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote, on 25 Feb 20 19:48: On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled. At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar.

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> I believe the preference variable is >> media.autoplay.enabled >> If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled. >> >> At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar. It does seem >> to work. > > That

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

David E. Ross wrote: I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled. At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar. It does seem to work. That is not strictly true. HTML5 autoplay is disabled.

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Danny Kile wrote: Issue was resolved by restoring a backup copy of my user profile file. I have no idea why this all started with an upgrade to Adobe Flash Player. Thank you for those that replied, Glad to see that it's working again. Going one step further, I think chances are pretty

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Danny Kile wrote: I am running Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5 UserAgent is User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/24/2020 11:29 PM, David E. Ross wrote: ... I believe the preference variable is media.autoplay.enabled If false, HTML5 media is disabled. If true, HTML5 media is enabled. At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar. It does seem to work. OK. Yeah, I have both of

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

gt;> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 >>> >>> I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash >>> Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't >>> broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is. >>>

Re: Best version of Adobe Flash Player

On 2/24/2020 9:17 PM, Danny Kile wrote: > What is the best version of Adobe Flash Player to run on Windows 7 Home > Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5? > > Thank you, > > Danny > Adobe's corporate blog indicates that Flash will no longer be maintained or distributed after

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is. When I went to YouTube it would not play any videos. Uninstalled the new version and went to my archives and installed a version that I knew worked

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is. When I went to YouTube it would not play any videos. Uninstalled the new version and went to my archives and installed a version that I knew worked. Well

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

On 2/24/2020 8:31 PM, Danny Kile wrote: > Anyways, my updated Flash is mostly disabled so YouTube and others use HTML5 for videos. Where are the setting to to disable Flash and the use HTML5 instead? Hmm, I don't think YouTube uses Flash anymore. Can you try a brand new SeaMonkey

Re: Best version of Adobe Flash Player

On 2/24/2020 9:17 PM, Danny Kile wrote: What is the best version of Adobe Flash Player to run on Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5? Danny, the (lat/new)est version from https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/. Currently, it is at 32.0.0.330. FYI, Adobe usually release a new version

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Danny Kile wrote: I am running Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5 UserAgent is User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's

Best version of Adobe Flash Player

What is the best version of Adobe Flash Player to run on Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5? Thank you, Danny ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

Win64; x64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is. When I went to YouTube it would not play any v

Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is. When I went to YouTube it would not play any videos. Uninst

Flash Player and YouTube Problems

I am running Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5 UserAgent is User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0 I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying

Re: Seamonkey crashing Flash Player

On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 6:40:05 PM UTC-7, Gunneric wrote: > Hey everyone, > > This just started with the last update of Seamonkey, but I'm getting the > flash player container hanging and crashing Seamonkey. > > I know a few iterations ago of Seamonkey, there was a fix

Re: Seamonkey crashing Flash Player

Gunneric wrote: Hey everyone, This just started with the last update of Seamonkey, but I'm getting the flash player container hanging and crashing Seamonkey. I know a few iterations ago of Seamonkey, there was a fix. But for the life of me I can't figure it out now. Since then I've gone over

Re: Seamonkey crashing Flash Player

On 03.05.16 3:40, Gunneric wrote: Flash Player container crashing googling: flash player plugin-container crash seamonkey gives 6800 hits. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo

Seamonkey crashing Flash Player

Hey everyone, This just started with the last update of Seamonkey, but I'm getting the flash player container hanging and crashing Seamonkey. I know a few iterations ago of Seamonkey, there was a fix. But for the life of me I can't figure it out now. Since then I've gone over to a new

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Lee wrote: Hi, On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX <Paul@houston.texas> wrote: https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb15-28.html says the current version is 19.0.0.245 Thanks for the heads-up about Flash .245. +1 for turning javascri

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

GerardJan wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Lee wrote: Hi, On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX <Paul@houston.texas> wrote: https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb15-28.html says the current version is 19.0.0.245 Thanks for the heads-up about Flash .245. +1 for t

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Lee wrote: On 11/29/15, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Lee wrote: Hi, On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: <.. snip bits about flash ..> +1 for turning javascript off. But way too many sites don't work if JS is turned off. It's kind of a pain

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

On 11/29/15, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: > Lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: <.. snip bits about flash ..> >> +1 for turning javascript off. But way too many sites don't work if >> JS is turned off. It's kind of a pain

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Lee wrote: Hi, On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX <Paul@houston.texas> wrote: https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb15-28.html says the current version is 19.0.0.245 Thanks for the heads-up about Flash .245. +1 for turning javascript off. But way too many sites

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Ed Mullen wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 7:51 PM: On 11/28/2015 10:36 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 1:10 PM: On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

DoctorBill wrote: EE wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Ed Mullen wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/28/2015 1:34 PM: Everything is dangerous to some extent. I know that Flash works good with XP3. If you use Flash, be sure to install the latest version. It is 19.0.0.226 for Windows as of Saturday, Nov 28, 2015. Be sure to set Flash cache to

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

On 11/28/2015 12:24 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use on SM 2.33.1 ? Using

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Hi, On 11/28/15, Paul in Houston, TX <Paul@houston.texas> wrote: > DoctorBill wrote: >> I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow >> Viruses and Trojans >> into your system. >> I went to Mozilla.org then this; >> https://addons.

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

On 11/28/2015 11:55 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 7:51 PM: On 11/28/2015 10:36 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 1:10 PM: On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 1:10 PM: On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 1:12 PM: Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/28/2015 1:34 PM: DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: > I read in several places that Flash Player is > dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans > into your system. > I went to Mozilla.org then this; > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ > > Is t

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

EE wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use on SM 2.33.1 ? Using

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use

Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use on SM 2.33.1 ? Using XP. Please eschew comments on XP ! Why

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

DoctorBill wrote: EE wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: DoctorBill wrote on 11/28/2015 12:24 PM: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went to Mozilla.org then this; https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-flash-player/ Is this safe to use on SM 2.33.1 ? Using XP. Please eschew

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

Ed Mullen wrote: Doing that will break an awful lot of valid sites that require javascript to function. Bank of America comes to mind. And any site that uses JS frameworks like Angular and JQuery and depend on Ajax, which is countless these days. We're back to the 90's again. -- Take care,

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

On 11/28/2015 10:36 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: > David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 1:10 PM: >> On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: >>> I read in several places that Flash Player is >>> dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans >>> into your system. >>&g

Re: Is 'Flash Player' dangerous ?

David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 7:51 PM: On 11/28/2015 10:36 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 11/28/2015 1:10 PM: On 11/28/2015 9:24 AM, DoctorBill wrote: I read in several places that Flash Player is dangerous as it can allow Viruses and Trojans into your system. I went

flash player issue - please help

For some reason, version 16.0.0.235 of flash player still shows as being installed in seamonkey. I have used the uninstall utility for flash player and deleted every location flash player exists then cleaned out the registry and still that version says it exists in seamonkey. It also still

Flash Player

Hi, I've recently got rid of flash player and find that in Firefox and Palemoon I can still view flash content but in SeaMonkey I'm not able to. Is there a way around this problem? Thank you. Regards, Russell. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

On 7/15/2015 5:31 PM, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: ... Yes, we got two releases in one weeks time. One was already a usual Patch Tuesday release. One was due to Hacking Team's data leak detailing unknown 'sploits. In any case, I am not crashing on Flash content at all. Ditto. I am sure there

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

On 7/15/2015 1:03 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 7/15/2015 12:05 PM, Bryan Morris wrote: It seems like Firefox and other Mozilla web browsers are having crashes too. Also, Adobe will be releasing another version this week so I am going to wait. I think this is an Adobe's issue, not Mozilla's

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

It seems like Firefox and other Mozilla web browsers are having crashes too. Also, Adobe will be releasing another version this week so I am going to wait. I think this is an Adobe's issue, not Mozilla's and SeaMonkey's. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/14/firefox_blocks_flash/ -- Bryan

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

On 7/15/2015 12:05 PM, Bryan Morris wrote: It seems like Firefox and other Mozilla web browsers are having crashes too. Also, Adobe will be releasing another version this week so I am going to wait. I think this is an Adobe's issue, not Mozilla's and SeaMonkey's.

b209 is out now! Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

I hope it fixes the crashes beside fixing the security holes. -- The men of experiment are like the ant; they only collect and use. But the bee...gathers its materials from the flowers of the garden and of the field, but transforms and digests it by a power of its own. --Leonardo da Vinci

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

I am not crashing but I can no longer go to full screen any more. However, I am on SM 2.36. It's likely something that's not fixed in 2.33.1 that is in later version of SM. You could always try the 2.35 contrib build

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

... I am not crashing but I can no longer go to full screen any more. However, I am on SM 2.36. It's likely something that's not fixed in 2.33.1 that is in later version of SM. You could always try the 2.35 contrib build

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

On Tuesday's early morning, I upgraded my Flash v18.0 b194 in my old Windows XP Pro. SP3's SeaMonkey v2.33.1 web browser. I noticed this plugin likes to crash once in a while and I need to reload the web page to reuse it. I tried clearing caches, restarting my web browser, etc. Is anyone else

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

Ant wrote: Nice. My about:crashes list shows a lot of reports on this Flash crash: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/059d7cdb-a250-422e-b1b3-4b02b2150710 https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/8d938eb1-3a9c-4b1e-9ef7-f07c72150710

Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

Hello. On Tuesday's early morning, I upgraded my Flash v18.0 b194 in my old Windows XP Pro. SP3's SeaMonkey v2.33.1 web browser. I noticed this plugin likes to crash once in a while and I need to reload the web page to reuse it. I tried clearing caches, restarting my web browser, etc. Is

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

Ant wrote: Hello. On Tuesday's early morning, I upgraded my Flash v18.0 b194 in my old Windows XP Pro. SP3's SeaMonkey v2.33.1 web browser. I noticed this plugin likes to crash once in a while and I need to reload the web page to reuse it. I tried clearing caches, restarting my web browser,

Re: Adobe Flash player v18.0 b203 plugin crashing?

Nice. My about:crashes list shows a lot of reports on this Flash crash: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/059d7cdb-a250-422e-b1b3-4b02b2150710 https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/8d938eb1-3a9c-4b1e-9ef7-f07c72150710

Re: Memory and Flash Player.

Ant wrote on 3/2/2015 10:26 PM: Get an ad blocker and put Flash to activate on demand. On 3/2/2015 11:32 AM, lr...@superlink.net wrote: I'm using Windows 7 pro SP1 Seamonkey 2.32.1 Shockwave Flash 32_16_0_0_305 Certain pages seem to take a lot of memory. I've seen Flash Player up above 2.5GB

Re: Memory and Flash Player.

Get an ad blocker and put Flash to activate on demand. On 3/2/2015 11:32 AM, lr...@superlink.net wrote: I'm using Windows 7 pro SP1 Seamonkey 2.32.1 Shockwave Flash 32_16_0_0_305 Certain pages seem to take a lot of memory. I've seen Flash Player up above 2.5GB. Seamonkey goes to around 500MB

Memory and Flash Player.

I'm using Windows 7 pro SP1 Seamonkey 2.32.1 Shockwave Flash 32_16_0_0_305 Certain pages seem to take a lot of memory. I've seen Flash Player up above 2.5GB. Seamonkey goes to around 500MB. Closing the pages I suspect to be causing the trouble makes the memory usage go way down. It seems

Re: allowing flash player

mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so

Re: allowing flash player

David H. Durgee wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path:

Re: allowing flash player

David H. Durgee wrote: I decided to try something, I shut down SeaMonkey and edited the pluginreg.dat file in the SeaMonkey profile to match the FireFox one regarding flash. Now it reports the proper version number, so that appears to be the source of my problem. Now the question is why

Re: allowing flash player

David H. Durgee wrote: Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: You can test here, and if you pass, your installation is current and you can ignore the scams: Test Adobe Flash: https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ Test Shockwave: https://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/

Re: allowing flash player

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.438 State: Enabled

Re: allowing flash player

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: OK, then can you give us the URL of a page where a Flash video doesn't play, and also describe exactly what happens instead, including any error messages? Are there some pages where Flash videos do play, or do all fail? Are you using an ad

Re: allowing flash player

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: You can test here, and if you pass, your installation is current and you can ignore the scams: Test Adobe Flash: https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ Test Shockwave: https://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ Thank You, it's current

Re: allowing flash player

David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.438 State: Enabled (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE)

Re: allowing flash player

Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: OK, then can you give us the URL of a page where a Flash video doesn't play, and also describe exactly what happens instead, including any error messages? Are there some pages where Flash videos do play, or do all fail? Are you using an ad blocker? not initiating

Re: allowing flash player

Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: You can test here, and if you pass, your installation is current and you can ignore the scams: Test Adobe Flash: https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ Test Shockwave: https://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ Thank You, it's current -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd

Re: allowing flash player

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: You can test here, and if you pass, your installation is current and you can ignore the scams: Test Adobe Flash: https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ Test Shockwave: https://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ Thank You, it's current

Re: allowing flash player

A Williams schrieb: actual = means current. The German word is Aktuell. Thank You for that correction. -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd Satelliten FAQ, DVB-T, Katzen, Mopped, Garten, Heimwerken: http://www.satgerd.de/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: allowing flash player

A Williams wrote: Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Gerd Schweizer wrote: In Germany the tv organizations offer cinemas in the internet till one week after sending. But they need the flash player. How can i tell seamonkey to allow the actual flash player? It's alreaday

Re: allowing flash player

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Gerd Schweizer wrote: In Germany the tv organizations offer cinemas in the internet till one week after sending. But they need the flash player. How can i tell seamonkey to allow the actual flash player? It's alreaday installed. What makes

Re: allowing flash player

Gerd Schweizer wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Gerd Schweizer wrote: In Germany the tv organizations offer cinemas in the internet till one week after sending. But they need the flash player. How can i tell seamonkey to allow the actual flash player? It's alreaday installed. What makes

Re: allowing flash player

Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Gerd Schweizer wrote: In Germany the tv organizations offer cinemas in the internet till one week after sending. But they need the flash player. How can i tell seamonkey to allow the actual flash player? It's alreaday installed. What makes you think it's

allowing flash player

In Germany the tv organizations offer cinemas in the internet till one week after sending. But they need the flash player. How can i tell seamonkey to allow the actual flash player? It's alreaday installed. -- Liebe Grüße, Gerd Satelliten FAQ, DVB-T, Katzen, Mopped, Garten, Heimwerken: http

  1   2   >