nteresting trick which I now understand.
Cheers,
L
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110426/ed2493ad/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailin
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:41:18PM +0530, umashankar mantravadi wrote:
> a very feasible idea. you really dont need transformer balancing (which i
> think the PPAs provide). impedance balancing will do it, and any dc 6 volt
> supply should work with the tetramic. i built john leonard a box wich
--On 26 April 2011 11:51 +0100 Dave Malham wrote:
Do _not_ economise on the charger, NiMH have to be charged using a very
precise regime and many of the cheap devices simply can't hack it.
In particular, look for chargers that charge each battery separately
since that then optimises the charge
That sounds really handy. I'm sure you'll let us know if you go in to
production...
-j-
On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:02 AM, Dave Malham wrote:
> I'm _very_ seriously considering building an "extension body" for our
> Tetramic, since the ppa's annoy me intensely. This would be a metal tube of
> no
*/
>
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110426/c1dd4173/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
I'm _very_ seriously considering building an "extension body" for our Tetramic, since the ppa's
annoy me intensely. This would be a metal tube of normal mic diameter (so that standard clamps can
be used) with a nose cone into which the Tetramic would plug (and be clamped somehow for additional
I've had very good experiences with good quality NiMH batteries - once I got away from trying to use
an el-cheapo charger. Do _not_ economise on the charger, NiMH have to be charged using a very
precise regime and many of the cheap devices simply can't hack it - in fact, I suspect that many of
t
Hi
On 24/04/2011 19:11, Helmut Oellers wrote:
...modern computers are also clever. Today nothing is unaccountable if we
know the formula and all variables.
That's a BIG assumption - and given the essentially chaotic (in the mathematical sense) nature of
the Universe, wrong. We are now pre
