Re: [Sursound] Domestic Concert Hall

2012-07-09 Thread Ronald C.F. Antony
On 8 Jul 2012, at 13:10, Daniel Courville courville.dan...@uqam.ca wrote: AFAIK, there's no HOA IRs out there. As Fons said, you can upsample/upmix/uporder 1st order B-Format IRs with Harpex-B, but, even then, there's not many B-Format IRs around. Apple's Logic's SpaceDesigner reverb used to

[Sursound] higher order ambisonics

2012-07-09 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
hi! mr gregory pallone just brought the mpeg-h workshop to the attention of the sursound mailing list: On 07/06/2012 01:33 AM, gregory.pall...@orange.com wrote: Hello, I'm new to this group (even if my colleague Jerome (Daniel) shares sometimes info about it) so I hope you will excuse my

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Garth Paine
/attachments/20120709/011fa78f/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 07/09/2012 01:17 PM, Garth Paine wrote: Hi everyone I have been gathering lots of ambient field recordings in A-Format for a few years using my SPS200 Soundfiled mike and a 788T. I have experimented with playback over an 8 channel circle, and also with 3 circles of 8 at different heights

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Augustine Leudar
...@activatedspace.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120709/011fa78f/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Augustine Leudar
: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120709/205c5ec7/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Garth Paine
Thanks for that feedback - I have HARPEX, but did not realise it does third-order horizontal? One drawback with Harpex is it does not do height Cheers Garth http://www.activatedspace.com http://www.syncsonics.com On 09/07/2012, at 9:27 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 07/09/2012 01:17

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 07/09/2012 01:57 PM, Garth Paine wrote: Thanks for that feedback - I have HARPEX, but did not realise it does third-order horizontal? One drawback with Harpex is it does not do height you could do HARPEX on the 8 horizontal speakers, then take two virtual microphones, aim them into the

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 07/09/2012 01:32 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: that is for 3d by the way but not sure ... anyone ? there are no hard upper limits. the absolute lower limit is (N+1)². in horizontal layouts, i find 8 too much for first order, and 12 too much for third order. the issue is that additional

Re: [Sursound] Domestic Concert Hall

2012-07-09 Thread umashankar manthravadi
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120709/cce9480d/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:13:04PM +1000, GP wrote: If the min is (N+1)². Surely for 3rd order that is (3+1)² = 16 speakers? The minimum is (M + 1)^2 for 3D, and (2 * M) + 1 for 2D, but - You better use at least on more, - For 3D, the minimum is 8, even for first order. That is because

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Richard Furse
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120709/011f a78f/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu

Re: [Sursound] Domestic Concert Hall

2012-07-09 Thread ThomasChen
___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120709/393d232c/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Daniel Courville
Le 2012-07-09 09:17, GP a écrit : I did wonder about using Daniel Courville's plugins to do decoding for the height info separate to HARPEX. The HARPEX decoding does sound good ( how can I confirm it is 3rd order over 8 speakers?) and so if I could add height using another approach that would be

Re: [Sursound] higher order ambisonics over 8 to 10 loudspeakers

2012-07-09 Thread Eric Benjamin
Fons Adriaensen wrote: for anything based on energy vectors the angle between the speakers can't be too big. Is there a good reference for that important point? Eric - Original Message From: Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org To: sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Mon, July 9, 2012

Re: [Sursound] Waveplayer - 16 chnl SD-card audio device

2012-07-09 Thread Marc Lavallée
I meant: one D/A conversion I wrote: It's possible to skip the A/D conversion by using amplifiers with digital inputs. Texas Instruments have a 8 channels digital to PWM converter that can drive D-class amps with PWM inputs; that means only one A/D conversion, done by the speaker...

[Sursound] Analogue Ambisonic Decoders

2012-07-09 Thread Martin Leese
Gerald Wilson g...@stonehill.org.uk Just checking: I assume no-one is manufacturing such devices anymore? Meridian currently include Ambisonic decoding in their surround sound boxes. (Although whether these are analogue comes down to definitions.) I am not familiar with Meridian's current