--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8a2b9c8d/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
hi *!
what's the status of ambisonia.com? it appears that while the site is
distributing torrent metadata, nobody is actually seeding the files.
i'd be willing to set up a permanent seeder if someone can put me in
contact with the current site admin (at york, i believe?).
best,
jörn
/sursound/attachments/20131216/cc1ae32b/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--On 16 December 2013 16:14 +0100 Jörn Nettingsmeier
netti...@stackingdwarves.net wrote:
what's the status of ambisonia.com? it appears that while the site is
distributing torrent metadata, nobody is actually seeding the files.
I am currently seeding my files; the rest are available on my
Hi Jörn (and all)
I'm in charge of Ambisonia (to some extent).
Oliver Larkin is the contact at York.
There's a seeder on the server, but it's not answering.
I restarted the seeder, without success.
I suspect that ports are being blocked from inside York;
it happens from time to time...
I'll
Augustine Leudar wrote:
Seeing as there is a dearth of 8 channel players - I was thinking I could
just use a 7.1 DVD on a loop for an eight channel sound installation - as
long as I can send a seperate audio signal to each of the 8 (the LF sends a
full range signal too) there shouldnt be a
Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 16 December 2013 16:14 +0100 Jörn Nettingsmeier
netti...@stackingdwarves.net wrote:
what's the status of ambisonia.com? it appears that while the site is
distributing torrent metadata, nobody is actually seeding the files.
I agree that some seem unseeded and it was
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/c6a743f4/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
--On 16 December 2013 16:18 + Andy Furniss adf.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for that site, coincidently I was actually downloading some
earlier today and found a dead link/mistake -
Farmer - A Little Pretty Bonny Lass AMB DTS
The AMB link points to the DTS dir and so doesn't
On 12/16/2013 04:48 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Hi Jörn (and all)
I'm in charge of Ambisonia (to some extent).
Oliver Larkin is the contact at York.
There's a seeder on the server, but it's not answering.
I restarted the seeder, without success.
I suspect that ports are being blocked from inside
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:40:01 +0100,
Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net a écrit :
The article is mentionned in the Linkedin profile of the co-author:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kiarash-alimi/40/2b7/117
yes, and precisely nowhere else. also, the excerpt
Andy Furniss wrote:
Augustine Leudar wrote:
Seeing as there is a dearth of 8 channel players - I was thinking I
could
just use a 7.1 DVD on a loop for an eight channel sound installation
- as
long as I can send a seperate audio signal to each of the 8 (the LF
sends a
full range signal too)
however I cannot
afford much more than USD 300 for each speaker.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8a2b9c8d/attachment.html
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Andy Furniss wrote:
According to wikipedia DVD-Audio only does 5.1 - it could be wrong
of course.
The DVD-Video page claims 8ch PCM support is in the spec, but says
it's not well supported by players.
Starts with the interface problems. Today you would use HDMI
pgp key is included for verification of my identity
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8d2e51d4/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Bearcat M. Şándor wrote:
If the bluray spec only supports up to 7.1, why are we seeing receivers
with 11.2 outputs? Are those just matrixed channels with some reverb
thrown in? I'll be thinking about this for my ambisonics setup.
When I said
Having had a look at the DTS spec (ETSI TS 102 114
Hello,
I would like to let you know that my previously announced apps,
AmbiExplorer and TetraFile, have gone live on Google Play. They can be
found here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=Hector%20Centenohl=en
Please let me know if you come across any technical problems or if you
(if any). I am not attached to these speakers however I cannot
afford much more than USD 300 for each speaker.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8a2b9c8d/attachment.html
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8a2b9c8d/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu javascript:;
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:13:15AM +1100, Alexis Shaw wrote:
In terms of decoder I was intending to hack a hifi preamp with an 8
input-12output matrix 128k long fir filters. That is DFT the inputs, for
each frequency in that fft multiply by a matrix, then do an IDFT on the
output.
1. That's
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:13:15AM +1100, Alexis Shaw wrote:
In terms of decoder I was intending to hack a hifi preamp with an 8
input-12output matrix 128k long fir filters. That is DFT the inputs, for
each frequency in that fft
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131216/8a2b9c8d/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu javascript:; javascript:;
https
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:53:23AM +1100, Alexis Shaw wrote:
1. That's giant overkill, completely useless. Whatever you need
as filtering in a decoder can be done easily with much shorter
impulse response. Or even with some simple IIR filters.
It is overkill for anything except
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:53:23AM +1100, Alexis Shaw wrote:
1. That's giant overkill, completely useless. Whatever you need
as filtering in a decoder can be done easily with much shorter
impulse response. Or even with some
24 matches
Mail list logo
