Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:55:49PM +0200, Wim wrote: > The major problem with wireless lays in the re-authentication that occurs > after a preset period. That takes up to several hundred millisecs. That's one problem. Another one is that you won't be alone on the channel. A quick scan here (Muni

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Augustine Leudar
> > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190529/54bacb40/attachment.html > > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190530/33d69a2e/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Paul Hodges wrote: > My concern with > wi-fi latency when multiple links are required to multiple speakers > would be that the latency will not be consistent between channels. > Although buffering will keep the data flow going, there is no way to > ensure

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Marc Lavallée
Le 30/05/2019 à 00:47, David Pickett a écrit : At 22:52 29-05-19, you wrote: Distribution to speakers using UDP multicast of a multichannel stream could possibly make the only time difference between channels be eventual receiver buffering. Just speculation... Bo-Erik UDP would basically

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread mgraves mstvp . com
sound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe > > here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was > scrubbed... > URL: &

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Chris Woolf
Answering this specific question... On 30/05/2019 10:42, Augustine Leudar wrote: ... I had some walkie talkies that had a range of one KM with admitedly terrible audio (surely this could be improved) . Whereas Senheiser in ear monitors have a really short distance range of around 40 metres and

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Augustine Leudar
r LTD Company Number : NI635217 Registered 63 Ballycoan rd, Belfast BT88LL www.magikdoor.net +44(0)7555784775 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190530/de617fc8/attachment.html>

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread mgraves mstvp . com
The RF issue of range, carrier frequency, channel width is quite separate from the deliverable audio path. The Opus audio codec has revolutionized audio coding. It's able to deliver full-bandwidth audio at bitrates not much more than what was once typical of a telephone call. This means that th

Re: [Sursound] wifi audio (was Re: Deconstructing soundbar marketing B.S.)

2019-05-30 Thread Stefan Schreiber
HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190530/de617fc8/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list surso...@music.vt.eduhttps://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsu