Hi Martin,
The Discogs site has the DKP 9001 version. Is this of any use?
http://www.discogs.com/Laurie-Johnson-First-Men-In-The-Moon/release/4086074
Steve
> On 6 Jan 2016, at 23:08, Martin Leese wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have recently purchased the 1980 LP "First
> Men in the Moon", SV-95002
In case anyone is still interested in lowly old UHJ pieces, there is one called
Flower of Life on most pages on the Immersive Audio’s site I just happened upon
that may be of interest, at least for a listen or two. It’s pretty abstract and
hypnotic and I found imaging pretty good and stable. I w
Likewise. I get some vague sense of spaciousness but nothing 3D.
> On 27 Oct 2014, at 11:28, dw wrote:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p028snwx
> Almost all in/near-head, to my ears.
> ___
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://m
FWIW, the (expensive) Meridian domestic DSP's can accept and decode Dolby
TrueHD, which is based upon MLP and one of their boxes can extract 8 channel
from HDMI. Also, I know from direct experience that a G series decoder can
accept and decode B-format from one of its sets of line inputs.
On 18
I have original CD’s of both Watermark and The Celts and cannot see any
ambisonic symbols on either, CD’s or sleeve notes, sadly. I wonder as well
whether there was more than one version of one or both albums.
On 5 Nov 2013, at 20:35, Bearcat M. Şándor wrote:
> To get back to the Enya question
Me for one.
Steve
On 13 Apr 2012, at 08:37, Paul Hodges wrote:
Actually, I'd be interested to know how many people on this list
listen to surround recordings on a surround system for simple
pleasure, as opposed to in the lab or as part of specific
investigations of the process.
Paul
_
Is 5.1 better than any 2 channel can be? Surely a matter of taste and
experience. Certainly I have not heard all stereo and 5.1 recordings
ever made and, so far, no G-format material. My point is from my home
user perspective that superstereo and UHJ decoding is pretty easy
these days to in
Meridian may be expensive, too, but at least they are sticking with
Ambisonics. Full horizontal 1st order B-format is now included in
their decoders, as well as UHJ, superstereo and Trifield. Oh, and I'm
a Meridian customer enjoying one of the few (only?) current domestic
ambisonic decoders
In case anyone using OS X does not already know, the Apple feedback
page is easy to find:
www.apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
Apple probably have some sort of threshold for numbers reporting
problems/bug fixes before they act. So the more, the merrier.
On 30 Sep 2011, at 09:04, Fons Adriaen
On 13 Jun 2011, at 09:30, Dave Malham wrote:
On 12/06/2011 00:34, Robert Greene wrote:
Yes that is it!
Incidentally, I would like to add a (nonmathematical)
point. I think dipoles are more or less a disaster for Ambisonics
Bass is one thing, but what dipoles mostly do is bounce sound off
t
FWIW I had RFI breaking in from taxi cabs on my phono connection from
a record deck (preamp input 100 microvolts - 100 Ohm/22 nF) and now
use similar ferrite ring add-ons as Richard suggests to all the
interconnects in my hi-fi just. It seems to work well, at least in the
RF ranges used by
, at least for the ambisonic bit.
The CD is the Hi-Fi News & Record Review test disc II (HFN015, 1989).
It's a pity I don't have room for a centre speaker for Trifield.
Steve
On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:32, Martin Leese wrote:
Steven Dive wrote:
One interesting, if odd sounding, effe
du
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Eero Aro wrote:
J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote:
in theory, you can. in practice, you can't, because you'd have to
know
what stereo technique was used during recording
Yes you can.
Just one word: Trifield.
Steven
From my perspective as a home user of a commercial home surround
decoder (Ambisonic UHJ, Trifield, Dolby etc.), I almost never see any
info on recording techniques on record labels and I can't foresee any
record labels ever stating which microphone techniques were used.
The manual for my Me
14 matches
Mail list logo
