On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:16 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, I think I misunderstood the issue.
>
> Can anyone please explain to me what the current situation is and why it may
> be a good idea to change it (or not)?
libx86 is a dependency of vbetool. Since the new rel
On Monday, 19 March 2007 21:46, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:27:50 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:
Hello
When I use the compression with uswsusp, the suspend step take longer than
without. This is in fact because uswsusp write the data synchronously to the
disk. So while it take time to compress the data the disk is idle, and while
it take time to write to disk the processor wait ...
I've h
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:27:50 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
Sorry, I forgot these informations :
I'm running Mandriva 2007, with kernel 2.6.17-11mdv, and
suspend-s2ram-0.5-8mdv2007.0
This is the output of my lspci :
00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev
Hi,
I succeeded to suspend-to-ram my system (home-mounted NForce 4 + Athlon 64 +
Geforce TC), with the default settings (no need to use s3_bios, vbe, etc...)
But a few seconds after the resume (I can type commands like ls during these
few seconds), my system hangs with this error :
CPU 0: Mach
On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
> >
> > > I removed all the removed x86em
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
>
> > I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are
> > included in the attached
On 3/16/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:37:20PM +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > On 3/14/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:40:03PM +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > > > > > I have HP Compaq nx7300 laptop and
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:09:19AM +0100, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> Hello, I had to add a "vga=0" for the kernel in the bootloader configuration
> to make suspend to ram work on my machine.
>
> I used Suse 10.2 with Kernel 2.6.20 and suspend-0.50.20070213-4.3
>
> s2r was finally the last point that
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:40:29AM +1100, glenn wrote:
> you guys made my day - wish i read the whitelist doc 12 mths ago...
>
> sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation"
> sys_product = "VGN-TX17GP_W"
> sys_version = "J00145V8"
> bios_version = "R0031V1"
>
> s2ram -f
>
> successfully
11 matches
Mail list logo