On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:27:50 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
> > >  
> > > > I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are
> > > > included in the attached bzip'ed diff
> > > 
> > > X86emu is no longer present in CVS right? Why do we then not just tell
> > 
> > Correct.
> > 
> > > people to get the tarball and install it? Just like for the other libs?
> > 
> > Well, it seems libx86 is not too common among distributions right now.
> > And it makes it easier to compile for Pavel ;-)
> >  
> > > This CONFIG_EMBEDDED_LIBX86 just clutters our makefile...
> > 
> > I don't care too much about one way or the other. I think it is not too
> > bad and it might make it easier for people to compile stuff by themselves.
> > 
> > But if there is a general consensus about that, i have no problem with
> > removing it.
> 
> Please don't.  Some current users may depend on it.

I can't see how people can `depend' on it. Especially since this is
only in CVS since a few days. Also libx86 isn't in CVS anymore so they
will have to get it anyway. The only difference is that instead of
typing two times cd XXX and make && make install, they only do that once.

But if this is a sensitive point because Pavel likes it, I'll stop
arguing about it;)

grts Tim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to