On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100
> > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier...
> >
> > > I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are
> > > included in the attached bzip'ed diff
> >
> > X86emu is no longer present in CVS right? Why do we then not just tell
>
> Correct.
>
> > people to get the tarball and install it? Just like for the other libs?
>
> Well, it seems libx86 is not too common among distributions right now.
> And it makes it easier to compile for Pavel ;-)
>
> > This CONFIG_EMBEDDED_LIBX86 just clutters our makefile...
>
> I don't care too much about one way or the other. I think it is not too
> bad and it might make it easier for people to compile stuff by themselves.
>
> But if there is a general consensus about that, i have no problem with
> removing it.
Please don't. Some current users may depend on it.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
If you don't have the time to read,
you don't have the time or the tools to write.
- Stephen King
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
