On Monday, 19 March 2007 08:28, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:05:40 +0100 > > Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier... > > > > > I removed all the removed x86emu files from the inlined patch, they are > > > included in the attached bzip'ed diff > > > > X86emu is no longer present in CVS right? Why do we then not just tell > > Correct. > > > people to get the tarball and install it? Just like for the other libs? > > Well, it seems libx86 is not too common among distributions right now. > And it makes it easier to compile for Pavel ;-) > > > This CONFIG_EMBEDDED_LIBX86 just clutters our makefile... > > I don't care too much about one way or the other. I think it is not too > bad and it might make it easier for people to compile stuff by themselves. > > But if there is a general consensus about that, i have no problem with > removing it.
Please don't. Some current users may depend on it. Greetings, Rafael -- If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. - Stephen King ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel