Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success on Gateway 200ARC

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 05:38:15PM -0400, Sudarshan S. Chawathe wrote: > > Thanks to everyone working on s2ram. I am happy to report that I was > able to successfully suspend and resume my Gateway 200ARC laptop using > the following: > >s2ram -f -m -s -a2 This is a very unusual combination.

[Suspend-devel] s2ram: success on Gateway 200ARC

Thanks to everyone working on s2ram. I am happy to report that I was able to successfully suspend and resume my Gateway 200ARC laptop using the following: s2ram -f -m -s -a2 The above works from both text console (VT1) and X (VT7), running xorg. As far as I can tell, everything resumes perfe

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

Hi, On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:59:50PM +0200, Sebastian Maus wrote: > Hi, > > --On 22. März 2007 13:32:58 +0100 Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:08:21PM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: > >> Am Freitag, März 16, 2007 16:12:46 +0100 schrieb Stefan Seyfried > >>

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

Hi, --On 22. März 2007 13:32:58 +0100 Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:08:21PM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: >> Am Freitag, März 16, 2007 16:12:46 +0100 schrieb Stefan Seyfried >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:15:08AM +0100, Sebastian Ma

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:08:21PM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: > > Am Freitag, März 16, 2007 16:12:46 +0100 schrieb Stefan Seyfried > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:15:08AM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: > [...] > >> | $ sudo ./s2ram -i > >> | This machine can be identified by:

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

Am Freitag, März 16, 2007 16:12:46 +0100 schrieb Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:15:08AM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: [...] >> | $ sudo ./s2ram -i >> | This machine can be identified by: >> | sys_vendor = "BENQ" >> | sys_product = "JoyBook 7000" >> |

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:15:08AM +0100, Sebastian Maus wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to follow your request on > > for reports of successful use of s2ram. Suspend to RAM worked for me so > far without s2ram, too. "s2ram -f" worked here. > > | $ sudo ./s2ram -i >

[Suspend-devel] s2ram: success report

Hi, I just wanted to follow your request on for reports of successful use of s2ram. Suspend to RAM worked for me so far without s2ram, too. "s2ram -f" worked here. | $ sudo ./s2ram -i | This machine can be identified by: | sys_vendor = "BENQ" | sys_product

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report - Hewlett-Packard Compaq nx7010 (PG589EA#ABZ)

Hello Stefan Stefan Seyfried ha scritto: >> poppero1:~# s2ram -i >> This machine can be identified by: >>sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard " >>sys_product = "Compaq nx7010 (PG589EA#ABZ) " >>sys_version = "F.55" >>bios_version = "68BAL Ver. F.55" >> See http://en.opensuse.org/S2

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report - Hewlett-Packard Compaq nx7010 (PG589EA#ABZ)

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Roberto Oppedisano wrote: > Hi there! > As you can see to make s2ram work I only need to use "-sf" arg. Ok. > Kind regards > Roberto > > poppero1:~# s2ram -i > This machine can be identified by: >sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard " >sys_product =

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2006-11-30 00:51:06, Gilles Grandou wrote: >> lspci -v >> [...] >> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility >> Radeon 9600 M10] (prog-if 00 [VGA]) >> >> using radeon xorg server. > > And no binary modules, right? right ;) Gilles. -

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Hi, On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:41:29AM +0100, Gilles Grandou wrote: [ an impressive list of test he has done... :-) ] > > The best config is definitively: > - no framebuffer > - s2ram -f -p Good, i'll add that to the whitelist. There are actually pretty many ATI Radeon machines that only work i

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Hi! > >> Just to let you know that s2ram is working fine on my laptop: > >> > >> # s2ram -i > >> This machine can be identified by: > >> sys_vendor = "CLEVO" > >> sys_product = "D500P" > >> sys_version = "Revision A2" > >> bios_version = "6.00" > >> See http://en.opensuse.org/S

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

On Thu 2006-11-30 00:51:06, Gilles Grandou wrote: > Gilles Grandou a écrit : > > Hi, > [snip] > > > > > config - from X > > > > s2ram -f-> resume ok > [...] > > oops, > forgot to mention my graphic config: > > lspci -v > [...

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Gilles Grandou a écrit : > Hi, [snip] > > config - from X > > s2ram -f-> resume ok [...] oops, forgot to mention my graphic config: lspci -v [...] 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Hi, Stefan Seyfried a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:29:21AM +0100, Gilles Grandou wrote: >> Just to let you know that s2ram is working fine on my laptop: >> >> # s2ram -i >> This machine can be identified by: >> sys_vendor = "CLEVO" >> sys_product = "D500P" >> sys_version =

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:29:21AM +0100, Gilles Grandou wrote: > Hi All, > > Just to let you know that s2ram is working fine on my laptop: > > # s2ram -i > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "CLEVO" > sys_product = "D500P" > sys_version = "Revision A2" > bios_v

[Suspend-devel] s2ram success report on CLEVO D500P

Hi All, Just to let you know that s2ram is working fine on my laptop: # s2ram -i This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "CLEVO" sys_product = "D500P" sys_version = "Revision A2" bios_version = "6.00" See http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram for details. s2ram -f is enough to

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

On Mon 2006-11-06 09:42:50, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On 11/6/06, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > > ... > > >BTW (from the rest of this thr

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > Hi. > > On 11/6/06, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > ... > >BTW (from the rest of this thread): radeonfb ignoring vga=0 seems like > >a bug worth reporting

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Hi. On 11/6/06, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: ... > BTW (from the rest of this thread): radeonfb ignoring vga=0 seems like > a bug worth reporting to me. > As Carl-Daniel explained it seems that radeonfb recognizes only

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:40:37PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > s2ram works perfectly both in console mode than in X with -f -s -p > > options, but _only_ if framebuffer (vesa or radeonfb) is disabled in > > kernel config. > > > > NOTE: framebuffer _must_ be disabled in config: if it's only di

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > Believe me or not, this is what happens. I believe you, that's not the problem... :-) > I use Fedora Core 6 and vga=0 is entered via grub, as usual. ... e.g. the suse graphical grub screen always appends options to the configured o

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

I think so, it works very well; I can live without the framebuffer console and s2ram is much more useful ;--) By the way, the exact model is DV4378EA (dv4000 is the generic name of the series). Regards, Fabio On 11/5/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > >

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Hi! > - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# s2ram > Machine is unknown. > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard" > sys_product = "Pavilion dv4000 (ES973EA#ABZ)" > sys_version = "

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Oh, sorry. I just read your previous email about how dangerous may be hacking with my card. Nevermind, then. Regards, Fabio On 11/4/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You remember correctly. That was the right syntax. > > Now I'm running a radeonfb-enabled kernel with framebuffer dis

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

You remember correctly. That was the right syntax. Now I'm running a radeonfb-enabled kernel with framebuffer disabled and s2ram -f -s -p works correctly. So, i'm looking forward to testing your patches ;-) Thanks, Fabio On 11/4/06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabio C

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Fabio Comolli wrote: > Don't know if this is because the new radeonfb code I mentioned in the > previous mail. > > Nov 3 21:37:46 tycho kernel: Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ > pci=assign-busses quiet vga=0 init=/sbin/initng radeonfb will ignore vga=0. You need to specify something like vi

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Believe me or not, this is what happens. I use Fedora Core 6 and vga=0 is entered via grub, as usual. Don't know if this is because the new radeonfb code I mentioned in the previous mail. Anyway syslog says: Nov 3 21:37:46 tycho kernel: Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ pci=assign-busses qui

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:02:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote: > I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot. Hm, i almost can't believe that. What distro are you using and how do you enter the "vga=0"? -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices| "Any ideas, Joh

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Fabio Comolli wrote: > I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot. > > I should have added that to enable framebuffer for my card I use this patch: > http://www.shaftnet.org/users/pizza/radeonfb-atom-2.6.18-v6a.diff > > found in BZ # 6215 . Sorry, your card is a radeon 4xx series and I

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Well, you asked for -vvn. Relevant part is: 01:00.0 0300: 1002:5653 Subsystem: 103c:309e Fabio On 11/3/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot. > > I should have added that to enable framebuffer for my card I use this patch:

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot. I should have added that to enable framebuffer for my card I use this patch: http://www.shaftnet.org/users/pizza/radeonfb-atom-2.6.18-v6a.diff found in BZ # 6215 . lspci -vv follows. Regards (and thanks for looking at this). Fabio 01:00.0

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Fabio Comolli wrote: > s2ram works perfectly both in console mode than in X with -f -s -p > options, but _only_ if framebuffer (vesa or radeonfb) is disabled in > kernel config. Can you try if vga=0 boot parameter is enough? And please post "lspci -vvn" so I can add suspend support to radeonfb for

[Suspend-devel] s2ram success

Hi. My laptop is: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# s2ram Machine is unknown. This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard" sys_product = "Pavilion dv4000 (ES973EA#ABZ)" sys_version = "

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram success on a Vaio TX17

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:47:06PM +1000, Brian Keck wrote: > > Hello, > > This is to report a s2ram success on a Vaio TX17 ... > sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation" > sys_product = "VGN-TX17GP_W" > sys_version = "J0019H8C" > bios_version = "R0031V1" > > Kernel is

[Suspend-devel] s2ram success on a Vaio TX17

Hello, This is to report a s2ram success on a Vaio TX17 ... sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation" sys_product = "VGN-TX17GP_W" sys_version = "J0019H8C" bios_version = "R0031V1" Kernel is Debian (sid) linux-image-2.6.17-1-686. What works is 's2ram -f -p' from X.