Nuclear plants are little more safe than a local sewage treatment plant in
the event of cataclysmic attack.
Lot of good a "a few meters" of concrete are going to do.
Let's see... A couple of fissures here or there... A few fractured cooling
lines... Loss of coolant... Exposed fuel rods... A cont
idaho yup still was messy
Original Message
Subj:RE: [biofuel] are nuclear plants really resistant to attacks?
Date: 9/14/2001 3:46:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (kirk)
Reply-to: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
The SR1(in
]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:04 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] are nuclear plants really resistant to attacks?
I believe the old AEC made that stipulation for all of them. In fact the
shape indicates it is stressed for a nuclear hit. TMI was an excellent
example of
>Hello,
>
>Last summer we were talking about nuclear energy in
>this BIOFUELS newsgroup.
>Somebody told that (most or all?) nuclear powerplants
>have been designed so that they are able to withstand
>fighter aircraft which falls onto the dome of the
>powerplant.
>But can the domes withstand to a f
much more data and hands on experience to base their standards on.
Hope this info lets you sleep better. From someone who has been there.
Original Message
Subj:RE: [biofuel] are nuclear plants really resistant to attacks?
Date: 9/14/2001 4:20:40 AM Eastern Daylight
Yes, if terrorist would be more danger ( than they were ) they could be used
the nuclear station to attack ;(
Peace.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/yS
It is my understanding that 3 mile Island is one of the very few that will
withstand a jetliner. This was the result of a legal action brought by an
activist in the area. The suit was based on the fact the powerplant was in a
flight path. I was told that is why 3 Mile Island didn't rupture during
