On 01/03/2009, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote:
It appears that all clucene/lucene capable frontends can do proximity
searches. BpBible exposes this via its GUI, others rely on the
clucene/lucene syntax.
Q: Is there anything particular about bpbible's proximity searches or do I
simply
On 01/03/2009, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Manfred Bergmann bergman...@web.de writes:
What is meant by Ancillary texts and Verse Lists?
Many modules, both Bibles and commentaries, have additional introductory
material at the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote:
I have worked now several hours on the wiki comparison page.
...
d) Bookmarks/tags/lists - all these appear essentially similar as a
concept, but with some drastic differences in terms of access, usability
and sub
Ben Morgan wrote:
I don't think book level introductions are usually particularly
important - definitely not a serious bug.
I think this is a decision for the module maker and not for the tool
maker. As long as the sword engine supports a feature, module makers
will make use of it - if they
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
clarifications first; I will wait for your response before editing the
tables or you can go ahead and edit it yourself.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Brian Fernandes
infernalprot...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
clarifications first; I will wait for
Hi there .
I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
doesn't compare. I know I keep going on about BibleCS and NET, but that
is an important issue to me. Load NET and look at Gen 1:26.
On Mar 1, 2009, at 3:33 AM, Ben Morgan wrote:
On 01/03/2009, Peter von Kaehne ref...@gmx.net wrote:
It appears that all clucene/lucene capable frontends can do
proximity searches. BpBible exposes this via its GUI, others rely on
the clucene/lucene syntax.
Q: Is there anything particular
Peter, (and others)
A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
under each table. Many of the headings are
Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
Here are very small graphics for supported operating systems. I'm not
sure if they will work good enough, but here they are. Sorry about
attaching them to the message but I didn't have a place to host them
right now.
Ben Morgan wrote:
I don't think book level introductions are usually particularly
important - definitely not a serious bug. Chapter level ones may be
important. They are usually suplementary material which isn't all that
important. If the user gets it, fine. If they don't, they are unlikely
Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there .
I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
doesn't compare.
why are you concerned? Fix it please. The bulk of the table was produced
by myself last night in
DM Smith wrote:
Peter, (and others)
A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
Thanks
I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
under each
Dan Blake wrote:
Eeli mentioned using graphics for some of the items to conserve space.
Here are very small graphics for supported operating systems.
Thanks Dan!
You know what I really would like to have is a minimalistic graphic for
yes/no/partial or some such.
Peter
Thanks Brian,
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
It started as a way for users to compare, but I think ultimatrely it
will be much more useful to developers etc.
I want to edit the FireBible rows
Ben,
I think the module developer should decide on this. As a module
developer I found it frustrating that only two front-ends, both of them
compiled only for Linux at the time, supported book level
introductions. When one front-end doesn't support a well-discussed
feature it is hard to know
Ben,
I think the module developer should decide on this. As a module
developer I found it frustrating that only two front-ends, both of them
compiled only for Linux at the time, supported book level
introductions. When one front-end doesn't support a well-discussed
feature it is hard to know
17 matches
Mail list logo
