Re: using sympy for a lightweight FE module

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
Hi Kent (and sympy list), So it seems that several people at the same time feel that sympy would be good for generating FE bases at least, in terms of either tabulated data in common sets of quadrature points, or a generated C(++) code, to be re-used later. Thanks for sending your code. I

Re: using sympy for a lightweight FE module

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
Ondrej Certik wrote: So it seems that several people at the same time feel that sympy would be good for generating FE bases at least, in terms of either tabulated data in common sets of quadrature points, or a generated C(++) code, to be re-used later. Thanks for sending your code. I think we

Re: using sympy for a lightweight FE module

2007-11-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi sympy team, I'm interested in this issue, and as Kent-Andre Mardal sits approx. 150cm from my office, we are quite synchronized. Actually, since the sympy license is less restrictive than that of GiNaC, I'm considering using sympy as backend to some of my software instead of swiginac.

Re: using sympy for a lightweight FE module

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
I'm interested in this issue, and as Kent-Andre Mardal sits approx. 150cm from my office, we are quite synchronized. Actually, since the sympy license is less restrictive than that of GiNaC, I'm considering using sympy as backend to some of my software instead of swiginac. Defaulting to a

SymFE

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
So here it is: http://code.google.com/p/symfe/ For the moment I am the only owner and Ondrej is the only member. Let me know in which group (owner/member) do you want to be included... r. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: SymFE

2007-11-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 26, 2007 2:40 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So here it is: http://code.google.com/p/symfe/ For the moment I am the only owner and Ondrej is the only member. Let me know in which group (owner/member) do you want to be included... Thanks. I suggest to do it the same as in

Re: SymFE

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
Ondrej Certik wrote: On Nov 26, 2007 2:40 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So here it is: http://code.google.com/p/symfe/ For the moment I am the only owner and Ondrej is the only member. Let me know in which group (owner/member) do you want to be included... Thanks. I suggest

Re: SymFE

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
Robert Cimrman wrote: Ondrej Certik wrote: Also, let's create symfe-devel google groups and discuss everything in there from now on. Will you do it please? Need to go now. I am trying to create the group for one hour already but I keep getting sever errors. Will try later and tell you

SymFE discussion

2007-11-26 Thread Robert Cimrman
I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] group. Please join :) r. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

Re: SymFE discussion

2007-11-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 26, 2007 5:55 PM, Robert Cimrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created [EMAIL PROTECTED] group. Please join :) Thanks. Subsequent discussion is in there. Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: patch

2007-11-26 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 08:35:17PM +0530, Goutham D L wrote: *Commited. BTW next time, could you please tell you hg to include your full name and email? * sure. Is there a way to send the patches directly using hg? Use patchbomb extension:

Re: removing the sympy-oldcore branch?

2007-11-26 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi, On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 03:55:21PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, how about removing the sympy-oldcore branch from the official repository: http://hg.sympy.org/sympy/ I think sympy-oldcore should be left inplace, read below. and creating for example a new sympy-oldcore